Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jeebo

(2,555 posts)
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:39 PM Jan 2021

How close could a sniper get to the inauguration site?

Could they get within a mile?

Aren't there sharpshooters with high-power rifles who can hit a target from a mile away?

I think Joe Biden and Kamala Harris should have their inauguration indoors. I am hoping and praying they will.

-- Ron

77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How close could a sniper get to the inauguration site? (Original Post) Jeebo Jan 2021 OP
I just asked that same question MontanaMama Jan 2021 #1
Jesus what a thought.... fantase56 Jan 2021 #2
Good god Deuxcents Jan 2021 #3
I think a 50 caliber sniper rifle maxes out at 2,000 yds TexasProgresive Jan 2021 #4
Not so effective against personnel beyond 1000 meters. Klaralven Jan 2021 #6
It isn't that the rifle isn't effective sarisataka Jan 2021 #17
Fifty Caliber legal? StClone Jan 2021 #10
Yes... if you have about $10K... and the range..? albacore Jan 2021 #26
Thanks. I remember several states (NY for one) tried to ban it StClone Jan 2021 #33
Not sure Timewas Jan 2021 #24
3,871 yards sir pball Jan 2021 #39
I'm with you. I just posted the 2,000 yards as close to the maximum range. TexasProgresive Jan 2021 #42
With a shot that far, even the earths rotation has to be accounted for. A HERETIC I AM Jan 2021 #46
I do have concerns greater that a lone sniper. It lies in the huge amount of NG and LEO presence TexasProgresive Jan 2021 #51
At least as much luck as skill, for sure sir pball Jan 2021 #52
I am more concerned about a cadre of hate filled LEO or Guardsmen TexasProgresive Jan 2021 #54
There is a bit more to it sarisataka Jan 2021 #5
A Canadian sniper has the longest recorded kill shot at 2.1 miles Submariner Jan 2021 #7
Over a mile, I don't like the idea of it being outside either. I am also worried that the law doc03 Jan 2021 #8
Agreed! SheltieLover Jan 2021 #18
On what basis do you not trust the Secret Service? cwydro Jan 2021 #47
Well, Turin_C3PO Jan 2021 #53
Well the Secret Service will have a half a dozen machine guns within about 20ft of the President fescuerescue Jan 2021 #57
DO you not think the Secret Service has a contingency for this? William769 Jan 2021 #9
Some of us remember the assassination of Anwar Sadat October 6, 1981 TexasProgresive Jan 2021 #50
My thoughts are with that many stationed the higher the probability littlemissmartypants Jan 2021 #62
Quite the corundum sarisataka Jan 2021 #63
Be chicken little all you want. William769 Jan 2021 #65
Yes, any line of sight where this is possible is blocked by bulletproof glass DrToast Jan 2021 #68
There will be helicopters, drones, security on buildings, etc. Maybe they'll tell Hoyt Jan 2021 #11
Just as I suspect his security detail nixed the train trip, I suspect they will pressure him to tblue37 Jan 2021 #27
Accidental dupe. Self-delete. tblue37 Jan 2021 #28
something's going on, I get dupes also.. A pop up box asks if I want to post this again... nt mitch96 Jan 2021 #37
I hope he is going to be fitted with a bullet proof vest. Doreen Jan 2021 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2021 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2021 #13
Washington Monument eleny Jan 2021 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2021 #31
Is the Colorado Candidate invited? lame54 Jan 2021 #14
Is VA-5 invited ?? MSNBC says his staff involved Captain Zero Jan 2021 #60
Won't he be protected by bulletproof glass? subterranean Jan 2021 #16
I was wondering the same thing. foo_fighter999 Jan 2021 #36
I've beed thinking about this question for over a week. BigmanPigman Jan 2021 #20
Wouldn't be distance but line of sight that's the problem coti Jan 2021 #21
What if an asteroid hits the building? They'd better hold it underground. marble falls Jan 2021 #22
Lol. cwydro Jan 2021 #45
I do my best. I try to panic at only specifically identified threats. marble falls Jan 2021 #48
Lol, buckle up because if there's one thing DU is good at - it's total panic over anything. cwydro Jan 2021 #55
Trump sowed a bumper crop, didn't he? marble falls Jan 2021 #56
He sure as hell did, thank god so many prognostications have NOT come true lol. cwydro Jan 2021 #58
Easy 90% vapored. marble falls Jan 2021 #61
Some still being recycled lol. cwydro Jan 2021 #74
Not that easy to have a clear shot from a mile or two away. onenote Jan 2021 #23
Joe's crowd will, by necessity, be about 1/100th the size of Obama's- I think he's OK. Nt Fiendish Thingy Jan 2021 #30
the organizers of the inauguration bdamomma Jan 2021 #69
Bet your ass wherever a sniper could hide, there will be agents there or in counter-sniping position SoFlaBro Jan 2021 #67
The Secret Service Plans For Every Contingency ChoppinBroccoli Jan 2021 #25
In a perfect world. (nt) Paladin Jan 2021 #72
Think about inaugurations over the past 50 years at the same site- any sniper problems? Nt Fiendish Thingy Jan 2021 #29
I'm sure there will be plenty of bulletproof glass surrounding him left-of-center2012 Jan 2021 #32
Well now that we are all being surveilled because of this post.... SlogginThroughIt Jan 2021 #34
Boy, so much wrong here. GulfCoast66 Jan 2021 #35
The Gravy Seals aren't disciplined enough to maintain the training required... EarthFirst Jan 2021 #38
There are ex-military in that mob. MoonRiver Jan 2021 #41
Depends on the number of, and degree to which, seditious Republican legislators are Roisin Ni Fiachra Jan 2021 #40
Came to say this! superpatriotman Jan 2021 #44
You don't want an answer to this question pfitz59 Jan 2021 #43
Let's do it in the Rotunda like in '85. FreepFryer Jan 2021 #49
Mike is in the private sector now fescuerescue Jan 2021 #64
Heh. (Nt) FreepFryer Jan 2021 #66
Look! The Secret Service is on this. MineralMan Jan 2021 #59
Reports on TV bdamomma Jan 2021 #70
Yes, it is, pretty much. MineralMan Jan 2021 #71
Given the events of this past week, I question the optimism on this thread. (nt) Paladin Jan 2021 #73
Should be done behind bulletproof glass radius777 Jan 2021 #75
I don't think this a good thread to have. I would delete it if I were you. yellowcanine Jan 2021 #76
I completely agree. Don't give em any ideas. IsItJustMe Jan 2021 #77

MontanaMama

(24,678 posts)
1. I just asked that same question
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:42 PM
Jan 2021

on another thread. Q-nut Qriminals with all kinds of guns, scopes and silencers...Any of them happy to die for the cause.

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
6. Not so effective against personnel beyond 1000 meters.
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:52 PM
Jan 2021
The primary mission of this rifle is to engage and defeat materiel targets at extended ranges to include parked aircraft; command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence (C4I) sites; radar sites; ammunition; petroleum, oil and lubricants; and various other thin skinned (lightly armored) materiel targets out to 2000 meters.

The M107 will also be used in a counter sniper role taking advantage of the longer stand off range and increased terminal effect when opposing snipers armed with smaller caliber weapons out to 1000 meters.


https://www.inetres.com/gp/military/infantry/rifle/M107.html

sarisataka

(22,372 posts)
17. It isn't that the rifle isn't effective
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:57 PM
Jan 2021

the shooter is the weak link. It is quite hard to hit a person at that range, very few can do it.

albacore

(2,747 posts)
26. Yes... if you have about $10K... and the range..?
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:11 PM
Jan 2021

In Afghanistan in 2001, A Canadian sniper made a confirmed kill at 7,982 feet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett_M82

I've posted a couple of times about my fears of the Barrett in the wrong hands, and god knows there are enough ex-military in the crazies.

StClone

(11,869 posts)
33. Thanks. I remember several states (NY for one) tried to ban it
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:34 PM
Jan 2021

To no avail. How big is too big. I love to hear the logic of that.

Timewas

(2,690 posts)
24. Not sure
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:09 PM
Jan 2021

What gun was used but the record for a sniper is over 2 miles by a Canadian team.
(on edit) it was a TAC 50.. Manufacturer says 1800 meters maximum but they beat the hell out of that

sir pball

(5,311 posts)
39. 3,871 yards
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 08:16 AM
Jan 2021

Is the longest confirmed sniper kill. That's farther than the entire length of the Mall, Lincoln Memorial to Congress.

It's an academic point though, as the talent and training required for that is so far beyond what Meal Team Six could muster that it's just a distraction from actually plausible threats.

TexasProgresive

(12,706 posts)
42. I'm with you. I just posted the 2,000 yards as close to the maximum range.
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:12 AM
Jan 2021

That 3,871 yard shot, what was the temperature, wind speed and direction? That seems like a 1 in a billion shot.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,872 posts)
46. With a shot that far, even the earths rotation has to be accounted for.
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:20 AM
Jan 2021

My answer to the OP is no way. The Secret Service and the DC police have been doing this for a long time. The threat against Obama was huge, so you know they had security sorted out.

TexasProgresive

(12,706 posts)
51. I do have concerns greater that a lone sniper. It lies in the huge amount of NG and LEO presence
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:27 AM
Jan 2021

See my response to William 769 below.

sir pball

(5,311 posts)
52. At least as much luck as skill, for sure
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:31 AM
Jan 2021

Plus all the ultra-long-range shots are up in the high mountains where the air is thinner, less drag = more range.

That said, it really is a total non-issue. There's probably a couple dozen folks on the planet who could pull something like that off and I doubt any of them will be in DC on 1/21...on the MAGAt side, at least.

TexasProgresive

(12,706 posts)
54. I am more concerned about a cadre of hate filled LEO or Guardsmen
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:35 AM
Jan 2021

emulating the assassination of Anwar Sadat. There are way to many present in these two groups for them to be properly vetted.

sarisataka

(22,372 posts)
5. There is a bit more to it
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:47 PM
Jan 2021

There are few guns capable of accuracy at such a range and even fewer people skilled enough to hit.

That isn't even considering the security forces which are aware that both do exist.

Submariner

(13,295 posts)
7. A Canadian sniper has the longest recorded kill shot at 2.1 miles
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:52 PM
Jan 2021

In Iraq I believe.

So they can be far off if they’re all that good a shot.

doc03

(38,958 posts)
8. Over a mile, I don't like the idea of it being outside either. I am also worried that the law
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:52 PM
Jan 2021

enforcement is compromised. These days you can't even trust the USSS.

Turin_C3PO

(16,385 posts)
53. Well,
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:33 AM
Jan 2021

there was an article posted here about a current SS member who is under investigation for supporting the Capitol insurrection on Facebook and saying the Democrats are traitors. Also reports of there being concern among the Biden people of some SS being too close to Trump, therefore Biden wants agents who have protected him in the past.

But I think the vast majority of SS are professional and are willing to die doing their job.

fescuerescue

(4,475 posts)
57. Well the Secret Service will have a half a dozen machine guns within about 20ft of the President
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:43 AM
Jan 2021

and at this very moment there are probably a dozen guns within 30 foot of Biden. Right now, this second. So the worry about the SS not protecting against rifle shots from miles away is a bit misplaced.

If the SS would want to do something horrible, there's not a damn thing anyone in the world anyone could do about it.

But the people that are armed near the President, are probably the most vetted and monitored people on the planet.


For reference, take a look at the 3rd photo down on this page. The man in the suit there is an SS agent a few seconds after Reagan was shot. That's a machine gun he is holding.

https://www.pennlive.com/life/2019/03/must-see-photos-of-the-attempted-assassination-of-president-ronald-reagan-in-1981.html


William769

(59,147 posts)
9. DO you not think the Secret Service has a contingency for this?
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:53 PM
Jan 2021

There will be LEO Sharp shooters where you would find the sharpshooters you are talking about & then some.

TexasProgresive

(12,706 posts)
50. Some of us remember the assassination of Anwar Sadat October 6, 1981
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:24 AM
Jan 2021

By Lieutenant Khalid Ahmed Showky Al-Islambouli.

From Wikipedia:

Islambouli and his platoon originally were not supposed to participate in the October parade, but they were chosen by the Military Intelligence, which was infiltrated by Islamist sympathizers under Colonel Abbud al-Zumar, to replace a platoon from the 133rd Artillery Battalion which was excused from participation for apparently failing some routine tests and checks.[4]

Once his platoon containing three heavy trucks towing M-46 field artillery guns began to approach the President's platform, Islambouli, along with Junior Sergeant Abdelhameed Abdul Salaam, 31, Corporal Ata Tayel Hameeda Raheel, 21, and Corporal Hussein Abbas, 21,[5] leapt from their truck and ran towards the stand while lobbing grenades toward where the President was standing with other Egyptian and foreign dignitaries.


The massive amount of National Guard and law enforcement does not quell my concerns. All it takes is one kill squad among them. We already know that many of the police and military are supporters of the right wing extremists.

littlemissmartypants

(32,806 posts)
62. My thoughts are with that many stationed the higher the probability
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 10:07 AM
Jan 2021

There's a lunatic fringe, based on simple statistics alone.

❤ lmsp

sarisataka

(22,372 posts)
63. Quite the corundum
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 10:28 AM
Jan 2021

It is too dangerous to be without security but can you trust the people providing security.

At some point you have to say we are doing the best we can or descend into paranoia.

William769

(59,147 posts)
65. Be chicken little all you want.
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 10:59 AM
Jan 2021

I'll put my faith in the protectors. We will see which one is right in less than a week.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
11. There will be helicopters, drones, security on buildings, etc. Maybe they'll tell
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:54 PM
Jan 2021

Biden, Harris, etc., to move a lot. I bet they won’t be out in the open much. And there will be a lot of security of people on their way to Washington, staying in motels, sleeping in cars, etc.

But, you never know what might happen nowadays.

tblue37

(68,362 posts)
27. Just as I suspect his security detail nixed the train trip, I suspect they will pressure him to
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:12 PM
Jan 2021
not take the path outside, or if he does, they will try to have the area at least partially enclosed.

Response to Doreen (Reply #12)

Response to Jeebo (Original post)

Response to eleny (Reply #19)

foo_fighter999

(87 posts)
36. I was wondering the same thing.
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:59 PM
Jan 2021

I sure hope he will.

Though, admittedly, I'd rather have the inauguration held inside, just for safety reasons.

BigmanPigman

(54,845 posts)
20. I've beed thinking about this question for over a week.
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 10:58 PM
Jan 2021

I think it should be held inside or Harris will become POTUS too soon.

Then I thought it about The Manchurian Candidate and wondered if the pro-tRump sniper could pull a 180 and shoot tRump instead. Since tRump won't be there maybe someone else will get killed in his place. Who knows how the RWNJ really think...do they "think"?

coti

(4,625 posts)
21. Wouldn't be distance but line of sight that's the problem
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:02 PM
Jan 2021

almost certainly, and surely security is aware of that also and on top of any dangerous positions.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
74. Some still being recycled lol.
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 12:34 PM
Jan 2021

I think war with Iran, civil war, and martial law are still going strong in the DUniverse.

onenote

(46,077 posts)
23. Not that easy to have a clear shot from a mile or two away.
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:06 PM
Jan 2021

Plus, he'll be behind bulletproof glass.


Here's Obama's second inauguration.

ChoppinBroccoli

(3,900 posts)
25. The Secret Service Plans For Every Contingency
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:10 PM
Jan 2021

I don't know a whole lot about this subject, but I can tell you just a few observations I've made over the years. On the Sunday before the election in 2008, Obama came to Columbus to speak on the Statehouse steps, and I went to it. The security was unbelievable. The crowd was massive, but nobody got within a city block of the Statehouse without going through a metal detector. And once inside, I noticed all the sharpshooters on the roofs of all the buildings surrounding the Statehouse (there was a commotion that caused people to start looking at one of the buildings--I guess some people who weren't authorized tried to get onto the roof to watch the speech and were summarily escorted out, but that's when the sharpshooters all popped up so I could see them). And those were just the security measures I could see. It was on that day that I realized that it would be nearly impossible to assassinate a President in this day and age.

Also, later into Obama's presidency, he came back to Columbus to give a speech, and he stayed in a hotel that I pass by on my way to the courthouse every day. From the parking garage across the street from the hotel, my friend pointed out that there was a line of school buses parked bumper-to-bumper behind the hotel. He asked me, "Do you know what that is?" When I said no, he said, "It's the blast radius. Those school buses are lined up at the exact distance away so that if someone tries to drive a car bomb in, it will blow up before it causes any damage to the hotel." That's when I knew Secret Service protection was on a whole different level.

I feel pretty confident that Joe is going to be safe next Wednesday no matter where they choose to hold the inauguration.

 

SlogginThroughIt

(1,977 posts)
34. Well now that we are all being surveilled because of this post....
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:37 PM
Jan 2021

I just hope everyone stays safe and the people paid ti keep them safe do a very very good job!

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
35. Boy, so much wrong here.
Wed Jan 13, 2021, 11:53 PM
Jan 2021

Long shots can happen. But it takes a highly trained team. Not just some dude who can shoot. The spotter is as important as the shooter. These peckerwoods have neither.

Plus, the SS knows this landscape like the back of their hands. There is no point of weakness they don’t know of. Chances are that hey will have their own sniper teams on the most exposed areas.

EarthFirst

(4,020 posts)
38. The Gravy Seals aren't disciplined enough to maintain the training required...
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 08:06 AM
Jan 2021

to make a sniper position with any sort of accuracy.

It's not a skillset that is easily replicated without maintaining diligent training.

That's not to say they aren't dangerous by any means; however very very very few possess this ability.

Roisin Ni Fiachra

(2,574 posts)
40. Depends on the number of, and degree to which, seditious Republican legislators are
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 08:42 AM
Jan 2021

determined to stop the inauguration and eliminate the threat of democracy. We don't know who, or how many, among them are the enemy within. All bets are off, when considering recent events.

Vice President elect Harris should repeat the Oath, and President elect Biden should be sworn in, at a private ceremony, in a secure, undisclosed location.

I would like to see the inauguration preparations proceed as planned, and have President elect Biden not show up at the last minute. This way as many traitors as possible could be trapped and arrested without any threat to the President elect. The inauguration could be recorded on video from a secure, undisclosed location, and televised soon after.

At this point, we really don't know who we can trust anymore. No apologies.

superpatriotman

(6,825 posts)
44. Came to say this!
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:16 AM
Jan 2021

Get a personal tour from Gaetz, Gohmert, Gosar, Biggs, Loeffler, Jordan, or Taylor-Greene to get you the reconnaissance you need.

MineralMan

(150,929 posts)
59. Look! The Secret Service is on this.
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 09:48 AM
Jan 2021

There are incredibly few places from which such a thing could take place, and the Secret Service knows about every last one of them. Trust me - they will be there and those places will be totally off limits.

It's truly not an issue.

MineralMan

(150,929 posts)
71. Yes, it is, pretty much.
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 11:42 AM
Jan 2021

They are closing the National Mall, too, which is where the audiences for Inaugurations generally stand. There simply aren't any sight lines from anywhere but the Mall, clear to the Monument. That is deliberate. Really, nobody will be able to even see the inaugural platform.

They've got this.

radius777

(3,921 posts)
75. Should be done behind bulletproof glass
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 12:46 PM
Jan 2021

and Kamala should not be too close to Joe. I heard there will be counter snipers looking out for any rogue police etc.

Ugh, this is sad situation, but it shows that BLM was exactly correct about the police/leo/military and how RW it is. Until we completely reform them it doesn't matter what laws etc we make as they will selectively enforce what suits their RW worldview.

yellowcanine

(36,748 posts)
76. I don't think this a good thread to have. I would delete it if I were you.
Thu Jan 14, 2021, 12:54 PM
Jan 2021

We should not be speculating along these lines. It is a gray area but still.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How close could a sniper ...