General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcConnell, Schumer close in on power-sharing agreement in evenly divided Senate
CNN
Manu Raju, Senior Congressional Correspondent
The top two Senate leaders are nearing a power-sharing agreement to hash out how the evenly divided chamber will operate, with Democrats in charge of setting the schedule but both parties likely to hold an equal number of seats on Senate committees, according to sources familiar with the talks.
The negotiations between Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and Republican Leader Mitch McConnell have been built largely around how the Senate operated the last time the body was split 50-50: When George W. Bush initially became president in 2001. Final details are still being sorted out between the two leaders, sources said.
Biden Transition
Similar to those rules, set in January 2001, Schumer and McConnell aides are discussing allowing bills and nominations to advance to the Senate floor even if they are tied during committee votes, something that could become common given that each party is expected to have the same number of seats on committees.
Democrats will hold the chairmanships of the committees, giving them power to set the agenda, and Schumer will be granted the title of majority leader since Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will cast tiebreaking votes on the floor.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/18/politics/mitch-mcconnell-chuck-schumer-power-sharing-deal/index.html
MagickMuffin
(18,318 posts)as MoscowMitch never would work with the Democrats on anything!
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)The two sides may be forced to actually work together. Unheard of! What is the country coming to?
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(22,957 posts)some swamp land in a great location for condo's.
KPN
(17,377 posts)anything that originates with Dems. This is a lousy deal if McConnells past is any indicator whatsoever. Why would we try to strike an amenable deal, trust or work with the person who obstructed Obama for 8 years, eliminated the filibuster for SCOTUS nominations. refused to bring a single piece of Democratic House legislation to a vote in the past 2 years, and game planned openly with Trump in dealing with the first impeachment in a way that made a mockery of the Senate trial? Why the fuck would we do that?
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)we will be back to "My way or the Highway." We can't forget that while we actually have a 51/50 advantage.
Squinch
(59,522 posts)dsc
(53,397 posts)Squinch
(59,522 posts)agree to this now if he had the advantage?
coti
(4,625 posts)People always seem to forget that MM didn't become Republican Senate Leader until 2007
KPN
(17,377 posts)coti
(4,625 posts)dsc
(53,397 posts)exboyfil
(18,359 posts)and have 51-49.
Tommymac
(7,334 posts)No, let him be marginalized by both parties for his last two years.
He has been a horrible Senator. Treats his constituents - like me - with arrogance and disdain. Even those on the bloody side of the aisle.
CentralMass
(16,971 posts)oasis
(53,693 posts)Thrill
(19,342 posts)Nevilledog
(55,080 posts)fearnobush
(3,960 posts)Get the McConnal treatment.
agingdem
(8,849 posts)Schumer decides what business comes before the Senate...McConnell has no say...Schumer isn't pushing bi-partisan anything...he bringing civility back to the Senate
TeamPooka
(25,577 posts)fearnobush
(3,960 posts)Her concern is sometimes backed by action unlike a certain senator from Maine.
TeamPooka
(25,577 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(22,957 posts)I'm not going to go off the deep end until it's warranted, but I am NOT on board with ANY "power sharing" with traitors.
Sucha NastyWoman
(3,019 posts)Be as ruthless as McConnel would be if he were in Schumers position.
stillcool
(34,407 posts)I was alarmed, but after reading the article it's not at all the way it sounds...although Senate rules are not something I'm schooled in. If there is some problem with how these rules are being decided on, I wish someone would point out what they are.
coti
(4,625 posts)from the Rebootlicker side.
You know damned well Moscow Mitch would never let that happen.
DeminPennswoods
(17,506 posts)and ask her what it would take for her to become an I who caucuses with the Dems like Sanders and King.
I wouldn't agree to equal numbers on every committee. Maybe some, but not the budget, judiciary or intelligence.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)as long as the VP is a Democrat. Let's act like it.