Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How can anyone doubt Donald incited violence, when he f%*king paid for it? (Original Post) kpete Jan 2021 OP
Follow the money.... FM123 Jan 2021 #1
The problem with protection rackets kurtcagle Jan 2021 #2
I fear pukes will find a way to exonerate him. triron Jan 2021 #3
This needs to be key evidence in the Senate trial. Midnight Writer Jan 2021 #4
K&R Solly Mack Jan 2021 #5
K & R Duppers Jan 2021 #6

kurtcagle

(2,634 posts)
2. The problem with protection rackets
Sat Jan 23, 2021, 03:22 PM
Jan 2021

Trump has always been a racketeer - his use of thugs and veiled threats to intimidate business rivals, politician, and regulators has been well documented over the years even before he became president, and The Art of the Deal usually involved an equal mixture of bribery and "protection". This was what I think the Capital Hill Coup was intended to be - a show of force and threat by a mob boss.

Yet protection rackets are brittle - intimidation and threats are used because the racketeer knows that they don't have the numbers to actually enforce their dictates, and Trump had failed in the one thing he had to do: ensure that the military was on his side. That's not to say that he didn't do a lot of damage to the integrity of the military in the process - they'll be weeding out insurrectionists for years - and it is arguable that he WAS able to suborn the Capital police.

The irony about all this was that had Trump been less lazy and more inclined towards obviously criminal approaches to everything, he could very well have won the election. As it is, the ex-President has made it very difficult for the Senate to NOT find him guilty of insurrection.

 

triron

(22,240 posts)
3. I fear pukes will find a way to exonerate him.
Sat Jan 23, 2021, 03:34 PM
Jan 2021

There are too many traitors to democracy.

Midnight Writer

(25,410 posts)
4. This needs to be key evidence in the Senate trial.
Sat Jan 23, 2021, 03:57 PM
Jan 2021

GOP can cherry pick the weasel words in Trump's speech to twist his meaning, but they can't change the fact that he paid people to organize this insurrection.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How can anyone doubt Dona...