General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow just announced that McConnell has caved and agreed to Schumer's demands
Drum
(9,128 posts)Walleye
(30,996 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)"stay tuned" or something along those lines. It was obvious that he knew a development was in the works.
El Supremo
(20,365 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)beastie boy
(9,274 posts)Apparently, McConnell will no longer insist on keeping the fillibuster as a pre-condition for accepting the Senate rules.
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,742 posts)Mancin , for one, does not want it.
beastie boy
(9,274 posts)And that's the whole point of Schumer's victory. If Schumer agreed to McConnell's term, then McConnel would know for sure. Not anymore. Time passes. Things change. Scumer has leverage on Manchin. A threat to remove the filibuster is as potent as actually removing the filibuster. It makes McConnel's position far, far weaker than it would have been otherwise.
panader0
(25,816 posts)Time for an overhaul, some reforms.
To me, democracy means-one person, one vote. Simple majority wins, not necessary to get 67 votes.
Popular vote totals should win. Democracy, where are you?
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Giving the minority some say in what happened forced the majority to work more cooperatively with the minority. In the past, it worked out pretty well. But when Republicans were last in the minority, they abused the process so badly that the Democrats had to get rid of part of the filibuster. Now that the Republicans are back in the minority, there is no doubt they will make their past abuses of the filibuster look like a waltz.
cstanleytech
(26,273 posts)Best plan to do that might be to focus on keeping what we have no and then lasering in on either two or atleast one of the most vulnerable Republican candidates running and win that seat.
Granted it will take a lot longer to gain a super majority but its probably the only way we are going to get there.
ananda
(28,854 posts)That's what I read awhile ago.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)If we make things happen and crush any GOP tricksters who stand in the way, we win in 2022.
If we waste years on vain efforts to compromise with the pigs, we get crushed in 2022.
Ellipsis
(9,124 posts)MontanaFarmer
(630 posts)Dems are in disarray, they're getting punked, and we're doomed to the minority in 2 years. How can this be?
beastie boy
(9,274 posts)I really want to see the expression on McConnel's face when the Dems get organized!
AllyCat
(16,173 posts)turtleblossom
(504 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(15,568 posts)McConnell has agreed to use the 2001 Organizing rules for a 50/50 senate, removing his demand for Schumer to promise to keep the filibuster intact.
WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)Is the filibuster gone?
groundloop
(11,517 posts)HOWEVER, as Leader Schumer has pointed out, there are a shit load of things that can get done with 51 votes. Things like voting on judges, budgets, reconciliation.... and a lot of important things can be under those.
It's not as if we can now do everything we want, but at least the grownups are back in control.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)able to obstruct Biden as he did Obama.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)We have the votes for a lot under it and Mitch wanted to neutralize it.
Am I off base here?
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)Irish_Dem
(46,767 posts)catrose
(5,065 posts)Irish_Dem
(46,767 posts)Nexus2
(1,261 posts)uponit7771
(90,323 posts)sheshe2
(83,708 posts)That is true????? OMG!
iluvtennis
(19,843 posts)sheshe2
(83,708 posts)She is adorable and suits my mood, iluvtennis.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)I think that's where McConnell is still going to come out ahead here. Back then, the filibuster was pretty much intact across the board. Makes me wonder if he'll use it to once again hold up judicial appointments.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Mitch is agreeing to the organizing resolution which he was holding up by insisting Schumer agree not to get rid of the filibuster. Now it looks like he's agreeing to the organizing resolution without that condition.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)So no strings apparently attached. Good.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)The rules may have included the filibuster since, like now, the filibuster was still permitted. But the rules also allowed for Democrats to get rid of it, which they still do.
WA-03 Democrat
(3,039 posts)That we could not kill it if we wanted to. See Senators from WV and AZ. Things may change and having that option open is a plus.
Lysol2020
(18 posts)what dirt Charlie found on Mitch to make him quit so easily.
servermsh
(913 posts)Link to tweet
getagrip_already
(14,674 posts)chuck all but said he would have 50 votes if mitch didn't change course. Mitch knew he wasn't bluffing.
Plus the middlers get to keep up appearances at home. win-win dems.
mitch doesn't fold a winning hand, and he had one if any of the dems refused to sign on.
Blue Owl
(50,325 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,111 posts)more so than I've ever seen him anyway.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)will prevent Mitch's plan to block everything. This is why he wanted it in the agreement.
ancianita
(36,009 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Cha
(297,026 posts)will apologize for jumping the gun
mcar
(42,287 posts)Some on here know so much more about governing, after all.
Vivienne235729
(3,381 posts)orangecrush
(19,492 posts)Flipped the turtle on his back!
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Are the new versions of Collins and Murkowski...
getagrip_already
(14,674 posts)mitch caved because all 50 dems were on board with eliminating the fillibuster if it meant control was at stake.
Mitch doesn't back down from a winning hand. He didn't have one and schumer did.
The dems will be there when needed. We may have to give a little, but we will get a lot.
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)I remain umconvinced.
getagrip_already
(14,674 posts)it is of course mho. And rachels.
But mitch doesn't fold when he has the advantage. He must have been convinced schumer had the votes.
It doesn't really matter "if" schumer did (though I suspect he did), mitch believed it.
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,742 posts)Ive heard Manchin say he wouldnt vote for it, and maybe theres at least one more?
getagrip_already
(14,674 posts)But didn't say anything about mitch blocking control. Very carefully crafted non-statements.
They would have voted to over ride in this one instance if mitch didn't back down.
Mitch got nothing, even though he would have been perfectly happy to have no agreement and continue to chair the committees. That was a win to him.
He caved. It's only a question of why, and it wasn't the figleaf by manchin because he had that a week ago.
denbot
(9,899 posts)Nuff said..
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts).... to uphold the filibuster. With two dems opposed Mitch doesn't have to oppose anything.
How is this a big win?
getagrip_already
(14,674 posts)and mitch gets nothing.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... was the filibuster. He got it.
getagrip_already
(14,674 posts)Manchin and sinoma didn't change their overall objections. He already had that assurance.
He was about to lose it though, and he ran for his bunker.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... was that part of R.M. report? (I don't watch TV).
moonscape
(4,673 posts)werent going to vote to get rid of it. But Schumer could get a 50 plus 1 vote to get rid of it for the one vote he needed to organize. Mitch was going to look stupid to push it since our caucus was united.
Edit: The above was what McCaskill said earlier today that Schumer could do so I assumed that was what Schumer had. . Just listening to Lawrence now and he believes Schumer was signaling on
Rachel that he had the votes to get rid of the filibuster, as you said, if Mitch remained stubborn.
If the later is true, sure wish Mitch had remained dug in!
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)mvd
(65,169 posts)Schumer gets to have the organizing resolution without an absolute promise to the Turtle. Manchin and Sinema could always change their minds, and the Turtle cant complain after what he has done.
Nexus2
(1,261 posts)Have they given a reason?
Vivienne235729
(3,381 posts)mvd
(65,169 posts)And normal civility doesnt work with the Repukes. I would like to keep it also, but not after the way the Repukes use it.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)uponit7771
(90,323 posts)... should be able to stop them
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)uponit7771
(90,323 posts)Politicalgolfer
(317 posts)He "caved" (snort) because 2 Dem senators assure that the filibuster will stay alive & healthy forever & ever....amen.....Mitch doesn't "do" cave😠
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)but that could change and Mitch knows it...he wanted it in the rules so he cave and did not get what he wanted.
Cha
(297,026 posts)will be forthcoming from those who were accusing our Dems of "caving".
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Cha
(297,026 posts)mcar
(42,287 posts)I care about your health.
Cha
(297,026 posts)dry :.. Could happen though. I've seen apologies on here telling they were so wrong about President Biden!
Mahalo for caring about my health, mcar!
Here's to you & yours!
Midnight Writer
(21,733 posts)Who else can snap Mitch to heel that fast?
Vivienne235729
(3,381 posts)Bc of trump and the crazy tea party seditionists. Mitch cant function without $. That dictates everything they do.
mcar
(42,287 posts)Schumer caved, Dems are weak, they bring a knife to a gunfight, they're spineless...
What did I miss?
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I'm sure there are plenty more where those came from.
calimary
(81,179 posts)Maybe he saw the Maddow interview?
BobTheSubgenius
(11,562 posts)Maybe I'm just punch-drunk from the last 4 years.
JHB
(37,157 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)JHB
(37,157 posts)The only thing the last 40 years have taught me to think about Republicans is the worst, and so please forgive me for my first reaction to good news being "aw, f***, what the hell are the stinking bastards up to now?"
I kinda need to see results play out. "Reported by Rachael Maddow" isn't quite good enough to start celebrating yet, for me.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)be prepared to work with the other side.
uponit7771
(90,323 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 26, 2021, 05:29 AM - Edit history (1)
... need to show us to convince us of that?
Have their leader incite and insurrection where the flags of treason are waved in our capital building, oh wait ...
Democrats are starting to sound like stalkers, their is no other side ... Jan 6th shut that notion down hands DOWN
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)We must govern. I remind you of Biden's referencing working with Dixiecrats during the 2020 primary who's views he despised to get stuff done. You can disagree or despise the other side but unless you have a filibuster proof majority with all members of your party committed to whatever legislation is needed, you must work with the other side. That is our reality and has always been how it really worked. For more than a decade, it has not worked and our country has suffered for it. McConnell made the decision to turn down all Democratic attempts at bipartisan bills despite the fact we were in a terrible recession because he hated Obama so much...I thank God for this or we might have Chained CPI today. But on the other hand, we also didn't get to fix the ACA, work on Minimum wage, and climate. Now, times are even more desperate and we must legislate for the good of the people.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)seven conservadems, moderates etc. who's seats we must protect We won't have majority without them. I am happy to have them and we will move forward with solid legislation. But don't expect perfection or a sweep with a 50 50 Senate where all our progressive dreams come true. It isn't going to happen. I hope we defy the odds and add seats at the Midterm. But we shall see. We won't get single payer but we can get a public option which will save so many lives, a $15.00 minimum wage is doable, Pandemic relieve, economic relief and getting the vaccine out... I think we will get Green new jobs as well and already much has been done via EO. Try some party loyalty for a change people maybe we will actually get some policy unlike before in our 'message' voting days. And the idea of a GOP takeover of Congress should motivate every Democrat and most independents to get out and vote.
JHB
(37,157 posts)..."I need more than 'Rachel Maddow reports' before I can believe it".
That's all I said. Why the F*** did you feel the need to throw all that other stuff on it and claim I had some kind of problem with it?
uponit7771
(90,323 posts)I trust the democrats intentions here I don't trust Moscow Mitch's as far as I can throw them with a broke arm.
Some people are feeling optimistic because they feel there's "another side" to deal with, I don't the "other side" left the building with Putin's Whore long ago.
After Jan 6th democrats who want to work with the "other side" are starting to sound like stalkers begging some uninterested person to love their democracy like we do.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)won't celebrate any victories for our side...if you are not among them, my apologies. ( I am not saying you do this by the way).
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)But a 50/50 tie with the Vice President on our side and several senators from red/purple states is not a strong hand.
If we can get $15 dollars and shore up the ACA I will be happy. Dont see us getting the entire 1.9 Billion virus relief although there will be something. Help for the states and extended unemployment maybe.
uponit7771
(90,323 posts)... just taxi to the runway and wont take off which is what Moscow Mitch wants with our economy; for it to just sit where its at.
I don't believe Machin for a second when he is concerned about debt etc., his objections to the bill aren't based on reality.
That's how the kGOP cobbled the Obama admin by keeping the state and local governments limping along and never taking the elasticity out of the work force to drive UE rate to near zero.
They're playing their old play book and we don't have a lot of time to screw around with their games
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Im just not as optimistic about the politics of it.
betsuni
(25,436 posts)malaise
(268,844 posts)Alpeduez21
(1,751 posts)gets a vote is 'losing' then I don't mind.
This can mean EVERY senator has to go on record for Corona relief, healthcare, a living wage, job security, and impeachment. Not to mention every other vote that will be brought up.
Moscow Mitch, purveyor of weapons to mass murderers, gave up Repukes being responsible for the impeachment. Democrats own that and I seriously doubt a conviction is coming. I don't know how the spin will fallout on all that, though. In some circles Dems will win and in others Repukes will. It tells repuke base trolls that Dems hate the lazy lying steaming pile Hump. I believe what Moscow Mitch gets is a bit of face saving which in repuke land can mean reality isn't real.