General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"The Squeeze of a Lifetime" or The GameStop stock frenzy, explained. Vox
If I understand this right, Independent daytraders from a Reddit group ganged up to out smart "Old House Fund Managers" who were betting that GameStop would lose market value (by buying call options). The Independent Reddit Traders were buying shares and forcing the price up (buying stock and put options). In the end, Independent Reddit traders wound up bankrupting some "Old House"Fund managers who were betting the GameStop stocks would go down. Do I understand this correctly?
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22249458/gamestop-stock-wallstreetbets-reddit-citron
BlueTsunami2018
(3,785 posts)Theyre now doing it with AMC theaters. A kid I work with just made four grand in a day from it and its just going up. Wish Id have jumped in, why should the worst of the worst make all the money?
Fiendish Thingy
(17,382 posts)As more folks jump on the bandwagon with different stocks (now AMC, whos next?), if enough short positions are called at once, market liquidity will freeze, bringing everything down, just like 2008.
It was fun while it lasted, hope folks come to their senses quickly, otherwise the burned big boys will call in favours at the FEC to go after the Reddit kids...
underpants
(185,307 posts)Reading later thanks
TheRealNorth
(9,626 posts)Before reality hits the stock price like a brick hitting glass, and all those people that didn't get out (usually the last to the party) lose their money.
FakeNoose
(34,756 posts)A few early investors win bigtime, a lot of losers end up in a barrel of sewage.
SeattleVet
(5,559 posts)TheRealNorth
(9,626 posts)Of course, they will be gone (if they are not already) while the people they tricked into pumping up the stock will be left to take the hit.
In the end, it's just one set of unscrupulous Capitalists being screwed by an even more unscrupulous group of Capitalists that decided to sweeten their pot by tricking people into throwing their money away so they can "stick it to the man".
Tommymac
(7,304 posts)And I am in their corner.
They didn't do this for themselves, they did it to show how corrupt Wall Street is.
They in effect UNIONIZED their efforts to out the real crooks in the Hedge Funds.
Occupy is NOT dead.
coti
(4,625 posts)to transfer wealth out of the hedge funds, once the squeeze is on, and into the participants' pockets. But yeah, the people coming in at the end will probably get hurt, once the hedges clear their short positions (and later start new ones).
Renew Deal
(82,738 posts)Don't they win no matter what happens?
coti
(4,625 posts)coti
(4,625 posts)Will be interesting to see what happens in about ten minutes here when the market opens. See if the bulls can push back or if the shorts will induce the panic they want.
Exciting stuff...
coti
(4,625 posts)fishwax
(29,291 posts)so shorting is (a) a big risk because you're selling something you don't own that is in very high demand with basically no available supply, but at the same time (b) a desperate hail mary that may in fact be necessary for the hedge funds, because otherwise the price just keeps going up and the losses keep stacking.
SeattleVet
(5,559 posts)There is no way that the shares can actually be cleared and traded, since there are a LOT more shares shorted than actually, physically available. IIRC, it was something like 138% of the available shares.
Years ago a short required an actual stock certificate to be traded. Several years ago that changed, and the hedge fund vultures figured out that they could short more shares than were really on the market, and hopefully not get caught.
The current situation has exposed them, in a much bigger way than just losing a few billion bucks.
I get the feeling that some of the big guys are going to be in a ton of legal trouble when the dust finally settles on this.
Ex Lurker
(3,877 posts)They're motivated by sheer anger. They want to destroy the Wall Street manipulators and if they lose money in doing so, it's worth it.
Takket
(22,360 posts)so i did some reading and i can't believe this is even legal. it isn't "investing" which isn't that supposed to be the point of owning stock? to invest in a company? putting your money into it so the company can grow along with your stock value?
and you cannot tell me ANY of the people that play this game aren't doing it with insider information.
The roulette wheel is a more honest way to make or lose money than this nonsense.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Many decades ago, when a person purchased a stock certificate and that was it, that person was investing in the companys growth prospects.
But then derivatives came along. They are basically modeled after commodities contract mechanisms, where middle companies hedge against a negative change in the price or supply of an underlying commodity. At least for commodities, it makes sense, a biscuit making company, for example can manage its costs by buying wheat contracts at a price, allowing it to use that ingredient price for business costs planning purposes.
But for stocks, it is naked gambling. Big financial companies normally sell Call Options or Put Options, they get immediate income from the sale of the options and then hope that the stock price does not change in a way that they have to buy or sell the underlying stock at a lost.
You are right, there is a lot of insider information involved, also manipulation of a stock price by big financial companies, if they have sold a lot of options and the stock price is going against them.
There are two basic types of Options sales, a naked Options sale and a covered Options sale. In the case of a covered sale, the company owns the number of underlying shares that it sells the Options for. In a naked Options sale, the seller doesnt own the stock, but borrow it from owners - for example, if you own 1000 shares of the Acme Toothpaste company, your Broker may sell options against your shares and borrow them from you - technically, you are supposed to be asked if the shares can be borrowed, but that may not happen - you would not be on the hook, the Broker would be if things go against it, BUT, if the Broker gets wiped out, you may have issues getting access to your shares, especially in the case of a bankruptcy by the Broker.
coti
(4,625 posts)and an often fixed form of gambling, at that. The manipulation that goes on daily for most higher-volume stocks is ridiculous.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)that is needed is for a stock to move a fraction of a point for them to pull in millions for stocks with big trade volume. So the situation becomes one of setting out cookie crumbs near a cookie-monster and expecting it to not gouge itself. If companies can make millions by manipulating a stock to move 1/8 of a point, they are going to play that game all day long, regardless of what the companys underlying fundamentals are.
Tommymac
(7,304 posts)They in effect Unionized to show that the game is rigged - legally.
This is not stocks themselves, but derivatives. Totally different thing, but a source of huge $$$ for big companies.
Basically Gambling without a license.
My hat is off the the ones who started this. Some will make money, some will ose it - but they have exposed the dirty smelly innards of Wall Street and it's legal cons.
Occupy is not dead. Just matured.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Call Options if they thought the underlying stock price was going to decrease. Essentially, by selling the Call options, they would sell the Call Option buyer the stock at a higher price, then when the stock drops below the strike price, they would buy it at the lower price and close their position (lock the options buyers into watching the Call Option expire worthless to them).
Selling a Put Option does the reverse, the seller is betting that the underlying stock will increase in price, the buyer of the option is betting that the stock price will decrease in value.
I may be wrong, this is not an area that I know a lot about.
sagesnow
(2,861 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 28, 2021, 09:24 AM - Edit history (1)
it artificially pushed the GameStop stock higher and higher forcing the Old House Fund Managers to loose their positions because they were betting that Gamestop stock share prices would fall. That caused Old House Fund Managers to lose their money.
coti
(4,625 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Volaris
(10,464 posts)Fuck em lol.
hatrack
(60,312 posts)And now all that "smart money" - bailed out by us in 1998 (LTCM), 2001 (Tech Bubble/9/11), 2008 (housing and financial collapse), 2017 (Shitstain's corporate tax giveaway) and 2020 (COVID) got a taste of free-market competition, and as a result is whining like a convention of poncy hairdressers.
Fuck.
Them.
Hugin
(34,299 posts)Yeah, someone found out how to game the High Frequency Trading bot's algorithms to their advantage in a largely gamed Market after Trump got through playing it into the ground. Now the people who own and operate the trading bots (Hedgefund, dudes) are all butthurt.
superpatriotman
(6,447 posts)Another 40%
American Airlines (AAL) - another Reddit pick is up -pre market, too
coti
(4,625 posts)I expect the shorts will hit hard starting new positions and try to start a panic.
Generic Brad
(14,357 posts)When I bought it I had intentions of investing long term, but when it rose so quickly, I felt something was amiss and sold my shares. Yes, I missed out on this week's gains. But I am not trying to get rich. If it drops back down to a more sensible price, I will probably invest again. I just have very little stomach for volatility.
Buckeyeblue
(5,638 posts)Stock prices all have some whimsy built into them. Unfortunately, CEOs manage to the stock price, and hope for the best with the whimsy.
As long as the Redditt group sticks with smallish companies, I don't see much harm. But if the decide to jump on a bank, it could be interesting.
MissMillie
(38,849 posts)And the hedge fund operators are a-OK with manipulating the markets in their own favor, regardless of who else gets hurt.
This time they got their asses handed to them. And unfortunately, they probably WILL get a bail-out.
The sad part is that the day traders now own a bunch of artificially inflated stock, and they're going to end up losing, and there will be no bail-out for them.
But you'll notice that all of a sudden, the hedge fund guys are open to some sort of regulation. Apparently what's good for the goose is not good for the gander.