General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,762 posts)SmartVoter22
(639 posts)One is held to high legally bound journalistic standards and the laws of libel, slander and malice under the 1934 & 1996 Communications Acts
Like printed newspapers, magazines and ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS.
The other is purely scripted fiction, like a b-grade movie; full of innuendo, speculation and lies, posing as truths.
Like foxnews, oan, newsmax, talk radio and any other opinion oriented fringe propaganda.
Congress could knee-cap the fictional 'news' by protecting the word 'news' only for use by those legally bound entities.
Fox News would have to be renamed to... FoxOpinion or FoxInnuendo. News would be a respected word again, one trusted to provide factual information validated by experts in a reports topic. Like it was before cable came along.
A simple Congressional definition of the word news to protect it.
I believe that they should and they will be.
Celerity
(43,349 posts)Dr. Strange
(25,921 posts)Can we sue politicians who make the claim that the election was stolen? Can politicians who challenge electoral votes be sued?
If we're going down the road of penalizing people for claiming the election was stolen, I'd start with politicians and lawmakers before the media.