There’s another dumb story they did recently that was right up there w the Rolex nonsense. Rachel does just fine on her own. So, in the 77 days: trump campaign to subvert the election, they find that the WH actually PLANNED the march to the capitol. Again, I don’t see the misrepresentation here. Is she lying? Is ANYTHING she said false? She didn’t say anything about the rest of the article. She even gave credit to where she got her information bc, let me tell you, if she hadn’t mention them, someone will be bitching about how she is trying to take credit for it. It seems she is damned no matter what she does. But s he chose that bc it is something that opens the door to prosecution. In my eyes, that’s what matters, anyways. I may find the nuances to what led up to the events interesting, but at the end of the day, I want this fucker locked up.
She zeroed in on something she thought was extremely important that was buried in an article. Isn’t this what she is supposed to be doing? Isn’t this what she has been doing all along? To bring to surface all the information that is buried either in a story (like this one) or to put all the pieces together like she did w the Russian connections early on? This is what she does. She finds interesting information and expounds on it. If anything, I have loved how she takes complicated situations and breaks it down for the lay person to understand. She definitely has a knack for that.
But I don’t see where she is selling outrage. The insinuation here is that it is manufactured. And she’s not making up the story. She’s not lying. The outrage is a natural result to the events happening. Gaslighting sells. She’s just reporting on it. And quite honestly, I would have to question you if you can see kids in cages and not be outraged. Or the implementation of racist immigration laws. Or the blatant support of white supremacy from the Trump administration. Or the million other things that they have been doing to normalize the extremist actions of their gaslighting. It stands to reason that there will be outrage. It is a normal human reaction. It is NOT normal to be ok w everything that is going on. As if it is status quo.
But to equate her w the likes of FOX is irresponsible and inaccurate on your part. They fucking outright lie and make excuses for every vile action that the RWNJ have done. They are the cause of why we are where we are. Rachel is one of the few that is actually calling them out. So it bothers me that you would spew so much venom her way when there is so much BLATANT RW propaganda out there with the sheer intent of disinformation to establish fascism as acceptable. Why aren’t you more upset about that? Rachel may not be perfect, but she sure as hell is not Fox News.
= new reply since forum marked as read
