Seditionist Codd's vacay plans have **not** been approved..

[Princess Turandot]

It appears that whoever reported this initially (USAToday?) mistook what's called a 'Text of Proposed Order' with an actual order signed by a judge, and other outlets just ran with it w/o checking further. This type of document is often filed by counsel on various routine matters in federal court to save time, although the judge isn't bound to use the proposed order. In this case, the defense filed the document along with its original motion.

You can see the document here. It isn't signed. It doesn't even show judge's name.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/33435647/13/1/united-states-v-cudd/

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[Demonaut]

1. chew on that!, pun intended

[Gothmog]

2. I hope that the judge does not approve this trip

[SoCalNative]

3. Cudd

not Codd

[Stallion]

4. In Federal Court every Motion must be accompanied by a proposed Order

...for the Court's consideration. The Respondent will have an opportunity to file a written response and their own proposed Order. The Court can use either, modify a proposed Order or sign its own Order

[lagomorph777]

5. Whew. My apologies to the judge.

I presume the judge will behave in a sane manner.

[Karma13612]

6. This is very good news!

Maybe she won’t be going after all!

[PoiBoy]

7. The current state of our pitiful media...

It appears that whoever reported this initially (USA Today?) mistook what's called a 'Text of Proposed Order' with an actual order signed by a judge, and other outlets just ran with it w/o checking further.


.. it's disgusting and sad to see the laziness in modern media.. this behavior is what has given rise to Faux snooze, trump, and now the MTG Quaziness... IMO..

I miss Media Whores Online...