Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pete Buttigieg: I want the United States to be leading the world in high speed rail (Original Post) Quixote1818 Feb 2021 OP
NICE! bluestarone Feb 2021 #1
Me too, Pete! rurallib Feb 2021 #2
I'd love seta1950 Feb 2021 #3
Yes DBoon Feb 2021 #6
+1 K&R - Sec. Pete is the perfect fit for Sec of Transportation - innovative and transformative onetexan Feb 2021 #9
Yes, please! eissa Feb 2021 #10
hell yeah.... dhill926 Feb 2021 #17
It's been a disaster, a boondoggle. WarGamer Feb 2021 #47
I agree. Xolodno Feb 2021 #52
It would be a lot cheaper to build a bunch of big casinos in Palmdale Klaralven Feb 2021 #59
Fun dayn moyl zu Got's oyem, Pete maxsolomon Feb 2021 #4
Kid's gonna do a great job in a VERY important cabinet position Yeehah Feb 2021 #5
Me too XanaDUer2 Feb 2021 #7
Nobody will ride choo choos, this isnt Japan, how's that Cali bullet train coming along? Baclava Feb 2021 #8
If you build it, they will come eissa Feb 2021 #11
You need new long straight tracks for bullet trains, u cant get easement rights around big cities Baclava Feb 2021 #14
If the option was there, I'd take a high-speed train over a plane Polybius Feb 2021 #15
Economics 101, how many seats will sell for a 1000mi trip from Omaha to Salt Lake City? Baclava Feb 2021 #18
You have to be sensible about it. Mosby Feb 2021 #19
U can fit 10 EU COUNTRIES inside Texas, we arent a densely populated COUNTRY, who is paying for it? Baclava Feb 2021 #24
This high speed rail in Texas is privately funded Quixote1818 Feb 2021 #31
I'm sorry EndlessWire Feb 2021 #43
Well since you have to pay for fuel, restaurants, motels or hotels lunatica Feb 2021 #25
I know! Covid-free trains for The Vaccinated! Covid-free Flight/Hotel/Casinos for The Vaccinated! Baclava Feb 2021 #29
Do you think 2020 COVID is forever? lunatica Feb 2021 #32
With the idiots refusing to get vaccinated? Yes, Covid will be here for a decade. Mask up! Baclava Feb 2021 #34
That's good to know. lunatica Feb 2021 #35
Zero seats. We have no plans to build HSR for such distances. tinrobot Feb 2021 #46
You also need much greater population density with Regular high volume daily commute grantcart Feb 2021 #60
Well, I can't speak about California bullet trains, other to say that every time I have taken a trip Trailrider1951 Feb 2021 #16
Close to 10% of the population is afraid to fly and 25% have some form of anxiety when flying Quixote1818 Feb 2021 #21
Conventional tracks will not hold bullet trains, and commuter rail track doesnt even come close Baclava Feb 2021 #22
The CA trains will be able to use regular tracks in cities Quixote1818 Feb 2021 #33
Dont get me wrong, I love trains, but country was built for long haul freight when land was cheap Baclava Feb 2021 #36
There is no doubt it's a different animal in the US than Europe, China etc. Quixote1818 Feb 2021 #40
I have been on Amtrak many times both in WA and in CA & Nevada marlakay Feb 2021 #54
Coming along a lot faster with Biden in office, that's for sure. tinrobot Feb 2021 #27
You're 100% correct. WarGamer Feb 2021 #48
Ahem! The Jewish space laser just cleared the forest for the CA high speed train!!11! Arazi Feb 2021 #51
This was great and if you let the videos roll BootinUp Feb 2021 #12
I'm with you, Secretary Buttigieg! peggysue2 Feb 2021 #13
Hell yes!! Initech Feb 2021 #20
The people of Florida have approved high speed rail TWICE.. The repuke gubment has dragged mitch96 Feb 2021 #23
Same problem Cali is facing, would have been hideously expensive to buy easement rights to build Baclava Feb 2021 #26
"hideously expensive to buy easement rights to build". I was curious about putting an above mitch96 Feb 2021 #37
Maybe, I dont know, personally I am holding out for the FLYING CARS Popular Mechanics promised me! Baclava Feb 2021 #38
I don't know about Pop Sci flying cars but I can see people sized drones for short hops.. mitch96 Feb 2021 #39
Yes! Trains are so 1850's, lol, flying drone cars that fly themselves! almost here! Baclava Feb 2021 #41
Yup, checks all the boxes for me... nt mitch96 Feb 2021 #42
Dayummm! Sweet! Still not sure it's such a good idea 🤔 electric_blue68 Feb 2021 #53
To avoid everyone being required to get a pilot's license blugbox Feb 2021 #57
🤔 ok... that sounds pretty good. 👍 electric_blue68 Feb 2021 #58
Might be better to invest in electric aircraft. Potentially a huge growth area. BSdetect Feb 2021 #28
Me too Secretary Pete! Demsrule86 Feb 2021 #30
BOONDOGGLE!!11!1!1 newdayneeded Feb 2021 #44
Unfortunately California's experience with HiSpeedRail isn't helping disprove that. nt EX500rider Feb 2021 #56
Um, well, they're little volcanic islands in the far east lindysalsagal Feb 2021 #45
As long as gas is cheap and developers are still building like it's 1970, Ron Green Feb 2021 #49
Me, too! DeminPennswoods Feb 2021 #50
I'm ambivalent on this. I've been on high speed trains all over Europe and some of China. GulfCoast66 Feb 2021 #55
We don't have the population density to overcome the enormous capital costs. grantcart Feb 2021 #61
That my feeling as well. GulfCoast66 Feb 2021 #63
YES PLEASE!!! We are long overdue for a systems upgrade. Vivienne235729 Feb 2021 #62

onetexan

(13,036 posts)
9. +1 K&R - Sec. Pete is the perfect fit for Sec of Transportation - innovative and transformative
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 02:55 PM
Feb 2021

These transportation infrastructure projects will create many many jobs for Americans, and in turn benefit the lagging economy

eissa

(4,238 posts)
10. Yes, please!
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 02:58 PM
Feb 2021

I live in the Central Valley and for those who work in the Bay Area, the commute is brutal. Getting to other parts of the state requires hours in the car, usually stuck in traffic. We deserve better.

WarGamer

(12,430 posts)
47. It's been a disaster, a boondoggle.
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 09:18 PM
Feb 2021

They should have started with ONE LINE.

Palmdale to Vegas with no stops.

Have a big park and ride near Palmdale.

90 minutes to Vegas. (150mph)

People would be THRILLED with it and the "acceptance level" would skyrocket.

It's not too bright to install high speed rail that only runs at 80mph and stops every 10-20 miles.

Me personally I was never a fan of HSR until I was in Naples and caught the HSR to Rome.

Unbelievable, I want one here.

Xolodno

(6,390 posts)
52. I agree.
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 10:52 PM
Feb 2021

That makes the most sense. Maybe add a stop in Victorville/Hesperia for those who go to Vegas via the Inland Empire and Orange County.

But...how do you justify CA tax money paying for Nevada's benefit? The Federal Government should get involved in some routes, finance and build it themselves if it requires to cross state lines.

And I desperately want high speed rail from Palmdale to Fresno, have family and own some property up there. Its a long drive that gets irksome and certain times of the year, dangerous due to the fog or smells absolutely awful, some time gag worthy.

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
59. It would be a lot cheaper to build a bunch of big casinos in Palmdale
Sun Feb 7, 2021, 12:56 AM
Feb 2021

Or maybe closer to the gamblers, like in Anaheim.

maxsolomon

(33,310 posts)
4. Fun dayn moyl zu Got's oyem, Pete
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 02:10 PM
Feb 2021

I'd settle for getting light rail built without incessant interference from Republikkks.

Yeehah

(4,585 posts)
5. Kid's gonna do a great job in a VERY important cabinet position
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 02:46 PM
Feb 2021

The USA is so far behind in mass transportation. Thanks in large part to the oil and auto industries and corrupt politicians.

eissa

(4,238 posts)
11. If you build it, they will come
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 03:00 PM
Feb 2021

It’s ridiculous that we lag so behind in public transportation compared to other industrialized nations. Our two options shouldn’t just be cars or pricey air travel.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
14. You need new long straight tracks for bullet trains, u cant get easement rights around big cities
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 03:12 PM
Feb 2021

People dont want to take trains long distances when they can fly faster, no future in passenger trains in the US, there just isnt.

We are a car culture to begin with, muh freedoms

Polybius

(15,381 posts)
15. If the option was there, I'd take a high-speed train over a plane
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 03:24 PM
Feb 2021

I don't fly. Would love to visit Cali from NY one day.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
24. U can fit 10 EU COUNTRIES inside Texas, we arent a densely populated COUNTRY, who is paying for it?
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 04:45 PM
Feb 2021

EndlessWire

(6,509 posts)
43. I'm sorry
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 08:09 PM
Feb 2021

but, haven't you heard? You are seceding from the U.S! It's not our problem. Maybe Mexico will pay for it!

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
25. Well since you have to pay for fuel, restaurants, motels or hotels
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 04:50 PM
Feb 2021

and wear and tear on your car if you travel across the country maybe getting there by high speed rail would be very attractive.

It would be the only way I would consider traveling cross country. It actually makes me want to travel again. I’m in my 70s, single and have mobility issues.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
29. I know! Covid-free trains for The Vaccinated! Covid-free Flight/Hotel/Casinos for The Vaccinated!
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 05:00 PM
Feb 2021

This could be a thing, just looking ahead, lol

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
32. Do you think 2020 COVID is forever?
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 05:12 PM
Feb 2021

That we’ll have to wear masks and socially distance for decades?

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
34. With the idiots refusing to get vaccinated? Yes, Covid will be here for a decade. Mask up!
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 05:18 PM
Feb 2021

States vary but nationally 10% have had first dose of vaccine

tinrobot

(10,894 posts)
46. Zero seats. We have no plans to build HSR for such distances.
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 09:14 PM
Feb 2021

To suggest that we would is simply setting up a strawman.

The reality is that high speed rail will be more of a regional thing. It will cover distances measuring in hundreds, not thousands of miles. HSR slots into the gap where the airline flights are less than an hour or so. Routes such as Dallas to Austin, Miami to Orlando, and between the many cities in the Northeast. Those distances are too far to drive quickly and too short to fly efficiently. In those cases, trains will be faster, cheaper, and way more efficient.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
60. You also need much greater population density with Regular high volume daily commute
Sun Feb 7, 2021, 12:56 AM
Feb 2021

The SFO/LAX route never had anything near the volume which would be more expensive and take longer than the many air shuttles

I am a big fan of rail but these plans are simply diverting public funds out of the inner city where better service is needed.

Trailrider1951

(3,414 posts)
16. Well, I can't speak about California bullet trains, other to say that every time I have taken a trip
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 03:27 PM
Feb 2021

On Amtrak's Coast Starlight train from Seattle to Los Angeles and back again, it has been sold out every time, months in advance in the summer. Until the pandemic hit, Amtrak's annual ridership was around 30+ million people:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amtrak#/media/File:Annual_Amtrak_Ridership_Graph_thru_FY2012.svg

And as for commuter trains, the trains I rode to work every week day were packed to the gills, standing room only. Many, many people in this country ride trains every day, and find them a pleasant alternative to driving or flying. Just because you do not ride the train, do not assume that they run empty, because they DON'T.

Quixote1818

(28,928 posts)
21. Close to 10% of the population is afraid to fly and 25% have some form of anxiety when flying
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 04:26 PM
Feb 2021

That is a pretty large portion of the population that might consider trains if they were faster. Close to 100 million people.
 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
22. Conventional tracks will not hold bullet trains, and commuter rail track doesnt even come close
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 04:42 PM
Feb 2021

You need a whole new giant infrastructure for bullet trains, insanely expensive to buy property rights in big urban areas

Quixote1818

(28,928 posts)
33. The CA trains will be able to use regular tracks in cities
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 05:17 PM
Feb 2021

Same as many European bullet trains.


Snip: The Texas Central line will be a stand-alone system based on the Japanese model. That means that the trains will always operate on dedicated high-speed lines.

By contrast, European high-speed trains—which are the basis for U.S. safety regulations—also run on conventional tracks shared with freight trains. This is the model used by California in its high-speed rail project.

The flexibility to switch between high-speed and conventional tracks makes it possible for the trains to serve cities well beyond the high-speed line. For safety reasons, though, they’re heavier than Japanese trains.
 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
36. Dont get me wrong, I love trains, but country was built for long haul freight when land was cheap
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 05:26 PM
Feb 2021

You might find areas it could work for shorter distances, but at what cost?

Quixote1818

(28,928 posts)
40. There is no doubt it's a different animal in the US than Europe, China etc.
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 05:48 PM
Feb 2021

Us being the leader in high speed rail probably won't happen for 75 years. I do think we need put some money into it in the most dense areas like between Miami and Orlando, Dallas and Houston, Chicago and NY, Boston to Washington D.C. etc. I wish they would allow gamboling on trains. I think that would help pay for them.

marlakay

(11,448 posts)
54. I have been on Amtrak many times both in WA and in CA & Nevada
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 11:52 PM
Feb 2021

I loved every bit of it. Talking to people in the dining car, being able to relax, read, walk around.

tinrobot

(10,894 posts)
27. Coming along a lot faster with Biden in office, that's for sure.
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 04:56 PM
Feb 2021

HSR will connect the coasts to the middle of the state in a way that air travel or freeways could never do. It's going to be very popular once it is complete.

BootinUp

(47,139 posts)
12. This was great and if you let the videos roll
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 03:03 PM
Feb 2021

You’ll see more in depth discussion of transportation history and then a very nice interview with senator Warnock!

peggysue2

(10,828 posts)
13. I'm with you, Secretary Buttigieg!
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 03:07 PM
Feb 2021

Biden and Buttigieg are perfectly matched on their enthusiasm for trains and high-speed rail. The United States is behind the curve on rail infrastructure, so it's really good to see the focus on the subject.

Personally? When I was living in the Mid-Atlantic, I always preferred the train over driving my car to DC or NYC. So much easier and no parking hassles. Spent ten years using the commuter train back and forth and travelled by rail exclusively when I was in college.

A definite !



mitch96

(13,890 posts)
23. The people of Florida have approved high speed rail TWICE.. The repuke gubment has dragged
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 04:42 PM
Feb 2021

it's feet doing no bid "feasibility" studies and the whole thing fell by the wayside under Scott..
To me it's a no brainer... Bullet train from Miami to Orlando, bullet from Orlando to Miami.. Miami/Orlando/Tampa? Bullet from Orlando to Daytona to Jax.. Makes too much sense.. YMMV
m

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
26. Same problem Cali is facing, would have been hideously expensive to buy easement rights to build
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 04:52 PM
Feb 2021

Taxpayers in the rest of the state would be paying for it, Miami Dade Broward counties had population numbers to push to build

mitch96

(13,890 posts)
37. "hideously expensive to buy easement rights to build". I was curious about putting an above
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 05:29 PM
Feb 2021

ground HS rail system between the north/south, east/west roadways using the median strip. . Very wide and if above ground pylons with tracks/hyperlink tubes were used it might be a easier way to do it. Make the pylons off site for efficiency, dig a hole, plop the pylon in and go to the next one.. I know....not that easy but you catch my drift...
YMMV
m

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
38. Maybe, I dont know, personally I am holding out for the FLYING CARS Popular Mechanics promised me!
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 05:32 PM
Feb 2021

"One in every driveway by 1970" they said

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
41. Yes! Trains are so 1850's, lol, flying drone cars that fly themselves! almost here!
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 06:09 PM
Feb 2021

That's hot

electric_blue68

(14,869 posts)
53. Dayummm! Sweet! Still not sure it's such a good idea 🤔
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 11:47 PM
Feb 2021

With some idiot drivers on the ground often causing crashes...
Imagine air car crashes falling to the ground. 😳
sigh.

Maybe only limited routes. Idk.

blugbox

(951 posts)
57. To avoid everyone being required to get a pilot's license
Sun Feb 7, 2021, 12:27 AM
Feb 2021

These would have programmed flight paths after you give it a destination. You wouldn't be in control during flight.

Also, they would travel at low enough speeds that a parachute system is actually feasible.

Not all hope is lost! There may be a flying drone car future yet!

newdayneeded

(1,955 posts)
44. BOONDOGGLE!!11!1!1
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 08:12 PM
Feb 2021

thats all the right wing assholes say. why? cuz that's what Limbaugh tells them to say. Totally brainwashed against change.

It would be awesome to lead the world in this!!

lindysalsagal

(20,666 posts)
45. Um, well, they're little volcanic islands in the far east
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 09:11 PM
Feb 2021

And we missed it. They're way smarter than us. And there's saki.

Ron Green

(9,822 posts)
49. As long as gas is cheap and developers are still building like it's 1970,
Sat Feb 6, 2021, 09:46 PM
Feb 2021

we will continue the car-based culture in this country.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
55. I'm ambivalent on this. I've been on high speed trains all over Europe and some of China.
Sun Feb 7, 2021, 12:13 AM
Feb 2021

It’s like nothing we have. Buts it’s a huge investment. And in Europe and and China as planes get more efficient and affordable more and more of them are flying. And we are bigger than Europe. While I like doing the trains since it is a kind of entertainment since I can’t do it here, there have been times I have flown because of convenience. 2 years ago a train trip from Venice to Munich would have been 12 hours. I flew in less than 2 hours for less than $120. That does not argue for train travel.

I’m not sure it’s a good investment.

I’d love to get DFW’s opinion. He lives in Europe and travels almost daily. Normally by air if I recollect correctly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pete Buttigieg: I want th...