Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
Sun Feb 7, 2021, 01:04 PM Feb 2021

Maddow and MSNBC win $258,000 in attorney fees after beating OAN in court: report

By Bob Brigham
Published February 06, 2021

?width=1200&height=645

Far-right One America News must pay $258,391.50 in legal fees to MSNBC.

"A federal judge in California has ordered Herring Networks, the parent company of far-right conservative media organization One America News Network (OAN), to pay MSNBC and host Rachel Maddow $250,000 in attorney's fees stemming from a defamation lawsuit that was dismissed last year," Law & Crime reported Saturday.

"Herring in July 2019 filed a lawsuit against Maddow which claimed the liberal host had defamed OAN when she discussed reports that one of the network's contributors also worked for the Russia state news organization Sputnik. Maddow went on to state that OAN 'literally is paid Russian propaganda,' which OAN's parent company claimed was false and defamatory. Herring, the parent company, then filed a defamation lawsuit seeking $10 million," Law & Crime explained. "Attorneys representing Maddow and MSNBC responded by filing a special motion to strike the case under California's Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (Anti-SLAPP) law."

https://www.rawstory.com/rachel-maddow-oan/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maddow and MSNBC win $258,000 in attorney fees after beating OAN in court: report (Original Post) turbinetree Feb 2021 OP
This makes me smile Gothmog Feb 2021 #1
I also this just makes me smile........ turbinetree Feb 2021 #2
Well it does surprise me Rachael Maddow would have reported anything as "matter of fact" msfiddlestix Feb 2021 #3

msfiddlestix

(7,270 posts)
3. Well it does surprise me Rachael Maddow would have reported anything as "matter of fact"
Sun Feb 7, 2021, 04:42 PM
Feb 2021

regarding claims about anyone or anything if she didn't have documented evidence, she's generally so careful about fact checking.

But I think the most egregious part of this Judge's ruling seems to be based on his his opinion about anything he regards as hyperbole and opinion is an automatically not considered defamatory. Anyway it's just a bit weird to me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maddow and MSNBC win $258...