General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. Treasury's Yellen: Americans earning $60,000 should get stimulus checks
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-healthcare-coronavirus-usa-congress/u-s-treasurys-yellen-americans-earning-60000-should-get-stimulus-checks-idUSKBN2A70JEU.S. Treasury's Yellen: Americans earning $60,000 should get stimulus checks
By Reuters Staff
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on Sunday that American workers who earn $60,000 per year should receive stimulus checks as part of the White Houses proposed $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package.
The exact details of how it should be targeted are to be determined, but struggling middle class families need help, Yellen said on CNNs State of the Union.
The White House has said it is open to negotiation on who should be eligible to receive the proposed $1,400 checks, and has declined to specify where it thinks the income cutoff should be.
President (Joe) Biden is certainly willing to work with members of Congress to define whats fair and he wouldnt want to see a household making over $300,000 receive these payments, Yellen said, without offering further detail.
If Congress approves the $1.9 trillion plan, the country would get back to full employment next year, Yellen said. Otherwise, she said, unemployment would linger for years.
roamer65
(37,846 posts)75k single, 150k couples.
60k is too low.
Cirque du So-What
(29,522 posts)I mustve missed it.
Turin_C3PO
(16,385 posts)to keep the threshold the same as the last two. Otherwise, it might hurt us in purple suburbs with many getting the first two payments under Trump but none under Biden. I agree that it shouldnt be a big deal either way but I want to do everything we can to keep the House in 22.
dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)roamer65
(37,846 posts)Its for Congress to decide. I want Congress to use the same thresholds as the last two.
I only got a small fraction of the first and none of the second, but I still want to see the same. We dont need to lose the House over this issue in 2022.
dawg
(10,777 posts)To do less than that would be political suicide.
Want to give more to the lower-earning folks? Good, do that too.
But don't cheap out on what people feel has already been promised to them. Don't make Trump look more generous to the middle-class than the Democrats.
