Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 07:50 PM Feb 2021

BREAKING: New details about Trump-McCarthy shouting match show Trump refused to call off the rioters

In an expletive-laced phone call with House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy while the Capitol was under attack, then-President Donald Trump said the rioters cared more about the election results than McCarthy did.

"Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are," Trump said, according to lawmakers who were briefed on the call afterward by McCarthy.

McCarthy insisted that the rioters were Trump's supporters and begged Trump to call them off.

Trump's comment set off what Republican lawmakers familiar with the call described as a shouting match between the two men. A furious McCarthy told the President the rioters were breaking into his office through the windows, and asked Trump, "Who the f--k do you think you are talking to?" according to a Republican lawmaker familiar with the call.


https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/12/politics/trump-mccarthy-shouting-match-details/index.html
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: New details about Trump-McCarthy shouting match show Trump refused to call off the rioters (Original Post) StarfishSaver Feb 2021 OP
Nice timing by the leaker underpants Feb 2021 #1
Yet, McCarthy voted to object the election results of at least one state LeftInTX Feb 2021 #2
When Kevin said to Trump, "Who the f--k do you think you are talking to?"... Yavin4 Feb 2021 #3
Tragic that this didn't make it into the official record. Laelth Feb 2021 #4
Why shouldn't it during the managers' rebuttal? ancianita Feb 2021 #25
I suppose it could. Laelth Feb 2021 #38
It's so compelling, ancianita Feb 2021 #40
It's not a question, to me, of whether or not the leakers are protected. Laelth Feb 2021 #42
Agreed. ancianita Feb 2021 #44
Interesting timing for sure MN2theMax Feb 2021 #5
I'll tell you who he thought he was talking to, one of his stooges. That's all they would have brewens Feb 2021 #6
IIRC he thought he was talking to Tuberville jmowreader Feb 2021 #36
Except that, according to the CNN report in the OP, "Well, Kevin ...." ancianita Feb 2021 #47
Trump knew damn well who he was talking to. triron Feb 2021 #48
You and I know that. I'm trying to help jmowreader's recall. ancianita Feb 2021 #49
Different call dpibel Feb 2021 #52
Makes me wonder why sdfernando Feb 2021 #53
Republicans need to realize this is not over. C_U_L8R Feb 2021 #7
Yep. I have a feeling things are just getting started. /pacino crickets Feb 2021 #12
Lots of movies and televises series... Dream Girl Feb 2021 #13
+1, uponit7771 Feb 2021 #17
Excellent point stopwastingmymoney Feb 2021 #29
Kick dalton99a Feb 2021 #8
ANy chance this could be brought up tomorrow? I dont know the procedure. It's Amaryllis Feb 2021 #9
Well hopefully they at least hear about it if they watch the headlines. milestogo Feb 2021 #19
I would think they could add it to the closing arguments BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 #20
and yet he did not vote to impeach Trump. drray23 Feb 2021 #10
I know it! BigmanPigman Feb 2021 #30
Shamelessness is their superpower. Solomon Feb 2021 #37
👆 flibbitygiblets Feb 2021 #54
Yea this should have been brought up during the trial! Maraya1969 Feb 2021 #11
They probably didn't know it. StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #15
The question is ... should there not have been a second article of impeachment, My Pet Orangutan Feb 2021 #22
I don't think so StarfishSaver Feb 2021 #23
The media is eager to paint the GOP as normal januoro Feb 2021 #14
Well... BumRushDaShow Feb 2021 #16
Poor Qevin (Q-CA) haz a mad at the Insurrectionist-in-Chief. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2021 #18
and yet.......... Takket Feb 2021 #21
Begging for IMPOTUS II's donor records mcar Feb 2021 #27
And they'll still vote to acquit matt819 Feb 2021 #24
This should be brought up in the trial... hurple Feb 2021 #26
INSURRECTION, not riot. niyad Feb 2021 #35
Does this help at all, do you think SS? mcar Feb 2021 #28
I think this matters more than anything else to republicans. onecaliberal Feb 2021 #31
"according to lawmakers who were briefed on the call..." madamesilverspurs Feb 2021 #32
Yet he goes to Mar-a-lago, remembering that he is only one whiney jackal in Trump's pack. ancianita Feb 2021 #33
Cable news--QGOP: the deadly Jan.6 capitol break-in riot not dЯump's fault or responsibility sprinkleeninow Feb 2021 #34
... Nevilledog Feb 2021 #39
DOES NOT pass the smell test. ffr Feb 2021 #41
Why not? Squinch Feb 2021 #56
Now the need to call witnesses becomes more pressing Do it! WTF not? triron Feb 2021 #43
knr triron Feb 2021 #45
kick again triron Feb 2021 #46
I don't believe it for a second superpatriotman Feb 2021 #50
This story is delicious. NoMoreRepugs Feb 2021 #51
Isn't it though? I keep hoping another shoe will drop. nt crickets Feb 2021 #55
McCarthys reply seems to have the following subtext: Squinch Feb 2021 #57
I can only imagine what Trump's answer to that was.... Pachamama Feb 2021 #58
... Wawannabe Feb 2021 #59
 

Yavin4

(37,182 posts)
3. When Kevin said to Trump, "Who the f--k do you think you are talking to?"...
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 07:56 PM
Feb 2021

I don't think that Kevin wanted an honest answer there. I highly doubt that.

ancianita

(43,307 posts)
25. Why shouldn't it during the managers' rebuttal?
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:43 PM
Feb 2021

It's only "inadmissible" evidence in a court of law.

ancianita

(43,307 posts)
40. It's so compelling,
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 09:06 PM
Feb 2021

I hope it does, too. But on the other hand, leakers are not protected sources.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
42. It's not a question, to me, of whether or not the leakers are protected.
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 09:24 PM
Feb 2021

The Senate is not required to follow traditional, judicial branch evidence rules. The Senate can admit any evidence it wants. For me, the issue is timing. This evidence may not get into the record because it was discovered so late. Still, it could get in. It just needs to be on record before the final vote.

-Laelth

ancianita

(43,307 posts)
44. Agreed.
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 09:27 PM
Feb 2021

There's no need to verify its accuracy at the point of rebuttal. The true source will come out later, and there will be no fight McCarthy can put up about it, because he knows it's been recorded by a three-letter agency.

 

brewens

(15,359 posts)
6. I'll tell you who he thought he was talking to, one of his stooges. That's all they would have
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 07:58 PM
Feb 2021

been if Trump had gotten away with it, and it was pretty much how he'd been looking at them all along.

That was maybe why the Supreme Court couldn't have been counted on to save his ass. I'd say Thomas and Justice Hand Maid would have just blindly obeyed, but no one else. Even Kavanaugh would have known better. If they did that, they wouldn't be a Supreme Court anymore. Trump would have ended up with a House and Senate under his control. He would be able to have any justice impeached and removed, if they even bothered to go through the motions. He could decree he had the power and just do it as emperor.

dpibel

(3,948 posts)
52. Different call
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 10:37 PM
Feb 2021

Trump dialed Mike Lee, thinking he was dialing Tuberville. Rudy did the same later in the day.

The McCarthy call was a different one.

sdfernando

(6,085 posts)
53. Makes me wonder why
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 10:39 PM
Feb 2021

McQarthy flew down to Merd de leggo and faced the 90 second mushroom again????

C_U_L8R

(49,393 posts)
7. Republicans need to realize this is not over.
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 07:58 PM
Feb 2021

With every prosecution, hundreds of them,
for conspiracy, insurrection, murder, sedition, etc
this Trump treason will be brought out to the limelight,
For years. Years.
You realize that Republicans?
Now what side are you gonna choose to be on through all that?
Good fucking luck.

 

Dream Girl

(5,111 posts)
13. Lots of movies and televises series...
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:03 PM
Feb 2021

“Republican Senators voted to acquit Donal Trump” forever more

Amaryllis

(11,304 posts)
9. ANy chance this could be brought up tomorrow? I dont know the procedure. It's
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:01 PM
Feb 2021

closing arguments, right?

BumRushDaShow

(169,860 posts)
20. I would think they could add it to the closing arguments
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:16 PM
Feb 2021

although it might get batted aside "hearsay".

What will happen after the vote is that all of this has to be taken "to the court of public opinion", although it will end up competing with the COVID relief efforts and other economic policy matters.

However it should be packaged for EVERY STATE so that the state party heads can use it to tie these loons to the GOP members running in their states and force them to take a stand.

BigmanPigman

(55,176 posts)
30. I know it!
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:50 PM
Feb 2021

I think the reason I don't understand their behavior is because their behavior and thought process is foreign to me and how I have been raised and lived my life. They must have a different value system and different levels of self esteem and respect.

My Pet Orangutan

(12,598 posts)
22. The question is ... should there not have been a second article of impeachment,
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:18 PM
Feb 2021

alleging dereliction of duty as Commander in Chief during the riot?

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
23. I don't think so
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:22 PM
Feb 2021

Dereliction of duty is an essential element of the insurrection article.

And a second article wouldn't have made a difference at all - except to give people something else to criticize ("The dereliction of duty charge wasn't necessary and just confused and distracted. They should have just charged him with one thing".)

 

januoro

(70 posts)
14. The media is eager to paint the GOP as normal
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:08 PM
Feb 2021

McCarthy is a trump lover. The Republican party is Trump's party.

BumRushDaShow

(169,860 posts)
16. Well...
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:09 PM
Feb 2021
That seems to make sense that this was the outcome of a "conversation.

I remember the news reports as the Capitol invasion was going on (I was watching CSPAN and listening to my local CBS affiliate news radio station) and the commentators were indicating that multiple people were trying to get a hold of 45 and eventually, it was reported, the "only" one who supposedly made contact was McCarthy. Supposedly people were even trying to get his kids to intervene.

At this point, the fodder needs to be banked for election time - and not just 2022, but literally for THIS year for any states that might have state legislative seats up. They need to define the GOP as supporters of insurrection.

Takket

(23,718 posts)
21. and yet..........
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:17 PM
Feb 2021

here he is, kissing the ring, of person who left him for dead

i just cannot explain how these people think. and frankly, i'm proud of that.

mcar

(46,064 posts)
27. Begging for IMPOTUS II's donor records
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:44 PM
Feb 2021

is what CNN is reporting.

These people are amoral, unAmerican idiots.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
24. And they'll still vote to acquit
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:42 PM
Feb 2021

They are immoral, cowardly, and treasonous. And these traits will be in the first lines of their obituaries.

hurple

(1,359 posts)
26. This should be brought up in the trial...
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:43 PM
Feb 2021

As evidence that McCarthy knows who was responsible for the riot... or, at least, did know on the day it happened.

Trump's counsel should be asked why trump refused McCarthy's request...

mcar

(46,064 posts)
28. Does this help at all, do you think SS?
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:44 PM
Feb 2021

I'm thinking no, it's too late. Which makes me wonder why now?

 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
31. I think this matters more than anything else to republicans.
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:51 PM
Feb 2021

Trump couldn’t have cared less if the mob would have assassinated Pence or any lawmakers. I hope the House Managers stress that point in their closing arguments.

madamesilverspurs

(16,513 posts)
32. "according to lawmakers who were briefed on the call..."
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:52 PM
Feb 2021

So a number of GOP members of congress had this information prior to the trial and chose to keep it quiet until now. The party has jettisoned any remaining shred of loyalty to the county.

.

sprinkleeninow

(22,351 posts)
34. Cable news--QGOP: the deadly Jan.6 capitol break-in riot not dЯump's fault or responsibility
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 08:54 PM
Feb 2021

Go screw yourselves in Slovak.

Nevilledog

(55,083 posts)
39. ...
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 09:04 PM
Feb 2021


Tweet text:
Jesse Lee
@JesseCharlesLee
The more I think about Trump’s quote here, the more revelatory it is that Trump truly viewed the attack as a way to physically terrorize Congress into overturning the election. That’s exactly why he didn’t call them off.

Greg Sargent
@ThePlumLineGS
Wow.

"Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are," Trump said to Kevin McCarthy, sources tell CNN.

Rioters were breaking through windows into McCarthy's office.

https://cnn.com/2021/02/12/politics/trump-mccarthy-shouting-match-details/index.html
5:57 PM · Feb 12, 2021

Squinch

(59,531 posts)
57. McCarthys reply seems to have the following subtext:
Sat Feb 13, 2021, 09:33 AM
Feb 2021

"I'm not one of those idiots who actually believes the crap you spew."

Pachamama

(17,565 posts)
58. I can only imagine what Trump's answer to that was....
Sat Feb 13, 2021, 06:54 PM
Feb 2021

He probably told his little Kevin that he is just like what he feels entitled to grab on women....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: New details abo...