General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAll the more reason to call witnesses.
emptywheel @emptywheel 6mAll the more reason to call witnesses.
Including him.
Link to tweet
Jake Sherman @JakeSherman · 9m
NEW ... McConnell will vote to acquit, he says in an email to his colleagues.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)A complete waste of time.
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...I'm fed up with this star chamber shit.
I want a public airing of this sedition, from the top to the bottom.
I'm not satisfied for the Senate to wrap this up quickly, especially not without a conviction. Think about what the implication is. Republicans say they won't convict and we fold up and go home? What kind of prosecution is that?
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)The impeachment trial is the wrong vehicle for that. It wouldn't have the effect you think.
This isn't a prosecution. It's a political process. No one is folding up and going home. The impeachment managers have done a brilliant job and accomplished more than anyone ever expected. Now it's time to move this to a different venue that is better suited for the kind of public airing you want.
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...this is some kind of new generation shortchanging of accountability which is a product of the cynicism of the last four years.
We need a full trial.
Irish_Dem
(46,564 posts)And there will be no consequences.
There is no rule of law for the GOP.
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...we've become used to shortchanging the process of law to suit the apathy of the right wing.
We need to revive accountability. That begins with a FULL public accounting of what happened. Not later in the news, but NOW while we are engaged in the process of accountability.
This isn't just about the vote, and if it is, we haven't done enough.
servermsh
(913 posts)So ignore those people saying the Senate needs to move on to passing COVID relief, which isn't ready for a vote.
The impeachment process would stop and videotaped depositions would be taken.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)They would have to first issue subpoenas and then vote on them (after debate). And once the subpoenas are issued, they'd be immediately contested and the House managers would spend a couple of weeks or longer in court fighting over them. And when the courts finally rule in a few weeks, they would try to question the witnesses, without knowing what they were going to say. And the witnesses would then refuse to answer questions and obfuscate.
In the meantime, the defense could also call witnesses. No telling what a mess that would be.
It's not as clean and simple as you think.
And he'd still be acquitted in the end.
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...two already reaffirmed their reported contacts with the president.
It's not as complicated as you suppose.
bluestarone
(16,872 posts)These Senate rethugs, no matter what PROOF was brought forth will NOT vote to convict!! Move on and get the AG. and rest of Biden's team!! He really will be in ANOTHER court room on this. I want to move ahead on everything!! In the publics eye he's GUILTY!!!
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...the public deserves to have this man barred from any political run in the future.
We also need to etablish boundries for presidents and candidates which will be corrupted by the aquittal. More work is necessary to preserve our democracy and process of elections. Without that, we're just treading water until the next election.
bluestarone
(16,872 posts)I will leave it up to those IMPEACHMENT Managers!! WHATEVER they choose!!
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...we should make certain we tell them what we want them to do.
bluestarone
(16,872 posts)Subpoenas will be issued. So now the VOTE first to allow it!!