Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts) Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:02 PM Feb 2021

16

Nicole Wallace just said

He (Trump) was just "referrered for criminal prosecution"

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nicole Wallace just said (Original Post) DLCWIdem Feb 2021 OP

Who referred whom? The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2021 #1

Please clarify! OAITW r.2.0 Feb 2021 #2

That was her headline. She was obviously talking about Mcturtle saying Trump didn't "get away with DLCWIdem Feb 2021 #6

It was a cute comment, meaning the Senate implicitly referred him for prosecution. servermsh Feb 2021 #3

That's Horrible sfstaxprep Feb 2021 #4

What? Rice4VP Feb 2021 #5

you mean, he (McConnel) referred him (Trump) - right? eShirl Feb 2021 #7

Yeah. I fixed it.I was trying to go for exact words. Wallace was trying to cheer us up DLCWIdem Feb 2021 #9

Let's all get high awesomerwb1 Feb 2021 #8

I get it, most trumpers won't RANDYWILDMAN Feb 2021 #10

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)

1. Who referred whom?

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:03 PM

Feb 2021

OAITW r.2.0

(24,467 posts)

2. Please clarify!

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:04 PM

Feb 2021

thx.

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)

6. That was her headline. She was obviously talking about Mcturtle saying Trump didn't "get away with

Reply to OAITW r.2.0 (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:07 PM

Feb 2021

She was obviously trying to reframe what happened. Rather than a failure.

" A referral for criminal investigation. ".

servermsh

(913 posts)

3. It was a cute comment, meaning the Senate implicitly referred him for prosecution.

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:04 PM

Feb 2021

Not technically true of course.

sfstaxprep

(9,998 posts)

4. That's Horrible

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:04 PM

Feb 2021

I think.

Rice4VP

(1,235 posts)

5. What?

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:04 PM

Feb 2021

eShirl

(18,490 posts)

7. you mean, he (McConnel) referred him (Trump) - right?

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:10 PM

Feb 2021

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)

9. Yeah. I fixed it.I was trying to go for exact words. Wallace was trying to cheer us up

Reply to eShirl (Reply #7)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:18 PM

Feb 2021

awesomerwb1

(4,267 posts)

8. Let's all get high

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:12 PM

Feb 2021

RANDYWILDMAN

(2,672 posts)

10. I get it, most trumpers won't

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2021, 05:40 PM

Feb 2021

and for certain 43 senate jurors wont get it.

Wasn't it Al gore who said when your paid not to understand an issue, you won't understand it. This helps me explain those people

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nicole Wallace just said