General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAt a certain point, states should be required to acknowledge climate change to receive federal
support for climate change related disasters. Texas is all about means testing people to receive emergency aid for individuals, right? How about when it comes to emergency aid for natural disasters that they helped perpetuate through decades of denial of the root cause, and refusing to do nothing to change?
JI7
(89,249 posts)percentage that voted for Beto O'Rourke.
And it's Republicans who do mass punishment .
I do think we need to bring up the issue. I remember some years back some people started attacking us for even bringing up the hypocrisy . I think most of these were right wing trolls .
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)If we could make the state actually DO SOMETHING about reducing emissions thru these means ... then we'd be talking.
jorgevlorgan
(8,291 posts)And albeit through a reasonable timeline. Not "Do this right now, or we're going to let everybody die."
JI7
(89,249 posts)So it would be a program to support certain measures and states that implement it will get funding from that program.
jorgevlorgan
(8,291 posts)jorgevlorgan
(8,291 posts)and for voters to respond to the issue. At a certain point, it doesn't make sense to keep letting them create the conditions that cause the problems while siphoning more and more federal money then complain about the debt as a political weapon. I think there's a way to push them in the direction, even if not completely, while not even entirely holding out on the aid, but getting them to be put on some kind of improvement plan to continue receiving it 10 years down the road.
DanieRains
(4,619 posts)Not all that fair.