Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jorgevlorgan

(8,291 posts)
Tue Feb 16, 2021, 02:42 AM Feb 2021

At a certain point, states should be required to acknowledge climate change to receive federal

support for climate change related disasters. Texas is all about means testing people to receive emergency aid for individuals, right? How about when it comes to emergency aid for natural disasters that they helped perpetuate through decades of denial of the root cause, and refusing to do nothing to change?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JI7

(89,249 posts)
1. That would mean punishing 46 percent of people that voted for Joe Biden and an even larger
Tue Feb 16, 2021, 02:48 AM
Feb 2021

percentage that voted for Beto O'Rourke.

And it's Republicans who do mass punishment .

I do think we need to bring up the issue. I remember some years back some people started attacking us for even bringing up the hypocrisy . I think most of these were right wing trolls .

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
2. Not to mention there's not much utility in them just saying 'okay, it's real, now show me the $'
Tue Feb 16, 2021, 02:52 AM
Feb 2021

If we could make the state actually DO SOMETHING about reducing emissions thru these means ... then we'd be talking.

jorgevlorgan

(8,291 posts)
4. That's more kind of what I mean.
Tue Feb 16, 2021, 02:54 AM
Feb 2021

And albeit through a reasonable timeline. Not "Do this right now, or we're going to let everybody die."

JI7

(89,249 posts)
5. Like perhaps a program where if States do x , y , z etc then they will get certain funds
Tue Feb 16, 2021, 02:56 AM
Feb 2021

So it would be a program to support certain measures and states that implement it will get funding from that program.

jorgevlorgan

(8,291 posts)
3. Not if you set a clear timeline with enough time for the state to adapt to the required changes
Tue Feb 16, 2021, 02:53 AM
Feb 2021

and for voters to respond to the issue. At a certain point, it doesn't make sense to keep letting them create the conditions that cause the problems while siphoning more and more federal money then complain about the debt as a political weapon. I think there's a way to push them in the direction, even if not completely, while not even entirely holding out on the aid, but getting them to be put on some kind of improvement plan to continue receiving it 10 years down the road.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At a certain point, state...