General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSweden Shows Texas How to Keep Turbines Spinning in Icy Weather
(Bloomberg) -- With the right gear, wind turbines can keep on generating through the harshest winter weather.
Thats the experience by researchers at an Arctic test site in Sweden, and their knowledge would have come handy thousands of miles away as ice and snow storms in Texas downed generators and triggered widespread blackouts. As much as half of the wind power capacity came offline due to the extreme cold.
The disaster underlines how vulnerable the world has become in the face of increasingly unpredictable weather brought on by climate change, and its raising questions about the global push to electrify everything from transportation to heating and cooling.
Keeping wind power going through extreme events isnt impossible as researchers in Sweden have proved. Turbines in the Arctic Circle can work in temperatures as low as -30 degrees Celsius (-22 degrees Fahrenheit). And most turbine makers, from Vestas Wind Systems A/S and General Electric Co. are now able to offer versions of their units that come armed with ice mitigation systems and heating for some of the equipment.
At its site in Uljabuoda in Sweden, the utility Skelleftea Kraft AB was one of the first developers to try to build wind turbines in extreme arctic climate a decade ago.
-more-
https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/sweden-shows-texas-how-to-keep-turbines-spinning-in-icy-weather/ar-BB1dJtjT?li=BBnbfcL
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)They work in Minnesota, where the weather is often below zero; you don't need to go to the Arctic to find wind turbines that function in cold weather.
Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)And no problems with the cold that I've ever heard of so far.
4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)Sometimes stave off big problems.
There are Air-Craft oils that go from 200 degrees F to -140 F in 5 minutes. It is also about $12.00 a quart.
You think someone saved a buck.
Most people are also not up on their NGLI ratings.
dsc
(52,157 posts)I am not sure I would have spend vast amounts of money to make turbines work in sub zero weather in Dallas and Houston while I am sure I would spend it in MN and WI.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Mister Ed
(5,929 posts)...that no one should use the failure of the Texas turbines to claim, "See! We told you so! Wind power is unreliable!", as I've heard that editorialists on Fox and in the Wall Street Journal have been doing already.
BeerBarrelPolka
(1,202 posts)Sadly, the repubs of Wi and Mn would agree with Fox and WSJ just to own the Democrats.
Stallion
(6,474 posts)....or civilized states like Oklahoma or Louisiana
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)Something tells me the accusations blaming windmills is a distraction from what are the real problems: privatization of the power grid, deregulation, and poor interconnection between networks.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)has been derelict in its duty to maintain a robust, modern power grid system.
Delmette2.0
(4,164 posts)It's because the refineries have to change something about the formula. Then back again winter to summer formula.
Somehow that does not apply to windmills that rely on lubrication.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)Celerity
(43,330 posts)UpInArms
(51,282 posts)And we have some fairly harsh weather patterns
mezame
(295 posts)And now this.
Scandinavian Culture Wars coming to a theatre (ok, theater) near you!
gab13by13
(21,317 posts)available for the turbines, but Texas turned it down. I read where Siemens was the manufacturer. Sorry, don't remember where, maybe here.
TNNurse
(6,926 posts)that work in those temps, but the bigger problem may be their isolated, independent power grid. Were they thinking about seceding when they did that????
roamer65
(36,745 posts)The 2003 power outage in the Great Lakes region was supposedly due to some botched line work in Ohio. Took down the whole damn region.
So I do believe they should be denied major interconnects until the ERCOT grid is fully updated and weatherized.
Clearly fogged in
(1,896 posts)ERCOT was formed in 1970. From wiki
The Texas Legislature amended the Public Utility Regulatory Act in 1995 to deregulate the wholesale generation market. The PUC then began the process of expanding ERCOTs responsibilities to enable wholesale competition and facilitate efficient use of the transmission system by all market participants.[2]
On August 21, 1996, the PUC endorsed an electric utility joint task force recommendation that ERCOT become an ISO. This ensured that an impartial, third-party organization was overseeing equitable access to the transmission system among competitive market participants. In September 1996, the change became official when the ERCOT Board of Directors initiated operations as a nonprofit ISO, the first in the United States.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)cos dem
(903 posts)IronLionZion
(45,432 posts)This happens rarely enough in Texas, they didn't want to spend the money to cold weatherize their equipment like they do in Sweden, Minnesota, etc.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Yet our turbines just keep on spinning.
I went past a bunch last weekend. They were perfectly fine.
Bucky
(53,998 posts)Botany
(70,501 posts)Swedes rock.
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)It's the design that was chosen for those wind systems. No one thought TX would ever get that cold.
If I'm Dade County, FL, I'm not going to pay a premium for a system that will function down to -10-degF when the average overnight low in the dead of winter there is in the mid-50's.
If I buy something that is qualified down into the upper 30's as a margin against that once-a-century cold snap that lasts all of two days, and then something crazy happens and we get a week at zero deg - that's not a shortcoming on my part.
Grokenstein
(5,722 posts)"Gol' damn, y'all see how easy this stuff breaks down?!"
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 16, 2021, 06:08 PM - Edit history (1)
... only our city light rail is having problems with the cold.
Wind Data (yesterday)
Wind energy covered 53.9% of the electricity consumption
Wind energy: 66.4 GWh
Offshore: 25.7 GWh
Onshore: 40.7 GWh
tishaLA
(14,176 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)It seems a tad temperamental, as rugged individualists are wont to be.