Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
2. It's the engines, not the airplane,
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 09:12 PM
Feb 2021

but people and the media will blame Boeing because they've never heard of Pratt & Whitney.

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
5. This isn't like pulling into Pep Boys and replacing your tires...
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 09:22 PM
Feb 2021

...with whatever is on sale. Boeing chose to equip the 777line with Pratt & Whitney. The aircraft can’t be flown if the engines are considered a risk.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
6. Many have Rolls Royce engines (which had their own issues and led to one crash)
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 09:28 PM
Feb 2021

Google British Airways Flight 38


Engines often are used across multiple plane types, and the Rolls issue also impacted an Airbus A300. It's normally left to airline preference.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
4. I expect it will apply to any plane using those engines.
Sun Feb 21, 2021, 09:19 PM
Feb 2021

Airbus had to do the same with the A380 fleet after a Rolls Royce engine blew apart and shredded the wing of Qantas Flight 32.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another Boeing grounding....