General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMerrick Garland just left Josh Hawley in a smoldering heap
Garland skewered Hawley by pointing out the hypocrisy of the Thin Blue Line rhetoric, which was plainly evident on Jan. 6.
Asked by Josh Hawley if he supports defunding the police, Merrick Garland says he does not, citing the ...horror experienced by police officers at the Jan 6 attack on the Capitol
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Link to tweet
?s=20
&feature=emb_logo
via:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/2/22/2017477/-Merrick-Garland-just-left-Josh-Hawley-in-a-smoldering-heap?utm_campaign=trending#comment_80342800
Ohiogal
(31,997 posts)A smoldering heap of manure ....
Blue Owl
(50,362 posts)RVN VET71
(2,690 posts)The lack of sincerity in his face is so clear and obvious its actually sad to watch. I loved how Garland simply answered his questions. I also loved the way he answered Lees heavily baited questions.
Garland is going to be confirmed. I cant see anyway he could not be. But he wont be in office a week before the Hawleys and the Lees start belching about how he is leaning towards the socialist left. If they draw on his confirmation hearing, theyll twist the questions and misquote his answers and their lies will be eagerly picked up by Fox and expanded.
I will take to my grave (or urn, as the case may be) the image of that hypocritical punk, Hawley, raising his fist in solidarity to the insurrectionists and then doubling down on the outrageous lies about Trumps landslide victory. Doubling down by threatening the electoral process, itself, and all without a shred or inkling of evidence.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)That crap Hawley brought up doesn't begin to compare what that asshole did to our democracy on Jan 6.
RVN VET71
(2,690 posts)And they will continue to batter it, seeking to open the wound wider until it is unsealable and democracy will just bleed out with a groan and a sigh.
If Biden manages -- and God bless him for trying -- to stop the bruising, to push it back, and then to re-assert a strengthened democracy as the guiding principle, the true strength of our nation, he will deserve a monument akin to Lincolns.
But the plutocratic fascists rule both the propaganda networks and the unwashed mob of the ill-educated. Those networks continue to lie with impunity, and that mob is still out there, awaiting further instructions.
Bidens job is monumental, as monumental as Lincolns, in my opinion. Virtually every Republican voter feels he should not be president, that Trump should continue to hold the reins of power. And the GOP Senators and Representatives in Washington -- save for a very small number -- all want Bidens election thrown out so that they can retain the power that enables them to enrich themselves and their donors.
Interesting times.
ananda
(28,859 posts)!!
dutch777
(3,013 posts)It will be very interesting to see if MO does anything to this guy come next election. I doubt it. MO seems to be a lost cause.
wont unfortunately. Republicans have a stranglehold on MO
ancianita
(36,055 posts)mahina
(17,652 posts)That should be widely known then because thats cheating
He makes my skin crawl
ancianita
(36,055 posts)An historical take on the overturning of the Electoral College vote...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition_Caucus
oldsoftie
(12,535 posts)bringthePaine
(1,728 posts)calimary
(81,261 posts)Aerator
(189 posts)That you have the 2 Senators that refused to except the results of the Presidential election and even encouraged the storming of Congress to prevent the counting of the Electoral votes sitting there is a position to question the integrity of anyone.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)catbyte
(34,384 posts)Garland refused to rise to the bait. What a guy.
On edit:
Without an ounce of shame or irony, he self-righteously "hopes" that Garland "doesn't politicize the Justice Department" after the 4-year clusterfuck we all just endured where Dear Former Leader essentially turned the DOJ into his personal attorney's office.
Grokenstein
(5,722 posts)"And will do you again when we're back in charge!"
LymphocyteLover
(5,644 posts)any Trump era crimes and claim how Biden and Garland politicized justice. I fucking hate GOP mofos.
Initech
(100,070 posts)turbinetree
(24,695 posts)in fact he even signed a letter saying that.............fuck him.........
Duppers
(28,120 posts)LymphocyteLover
(5,644 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,972 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Just sayin'...
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)cuts the police budget and raises revenue.
Ka-Dinh Oy
(11,686 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)For that matter what the hell is Lyndsey Graham, Ted Cruise and Hawley doing on that committee????????????
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)Hawley is a walking smoldering heap of Horse Pucky mixed in with a heaping pile of Poppy Cock on a 24/7 basis, which is probably why that session left him looking smart and sophisticated.
Of course Garland could NOT respond in a way that I would have expected under any other circumstances, but he didn't nick Hawley on any level. left no lasting smack mark or even left him stuttering for even an instant.
which is just as well, what the hell was that traitor doing on the committee anyhow?
Celerity
(43,353 posts)I saw no real smackdown moment at all. Katie Porter's style on that POS Jamie Dimon, now that was a smackdown.
btw
FUCK that traitor Hawley!
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)And Katie Porter always delivers pulling absolutely no punches. Now Garland is in a different position, he's trying his best to appeal in order to be confirmed. So he can be forgiven because he is not the position to do that, as much as I would have loved it.
But I don't what I don't understand is how in the hell Hawley is even allowed to be sitting on that committee, Ted Cruz and Linsey Graham as well.
notinkansas
(1,096 posts)I can't look at the guy without seeing that raised fist.
DanieRains
(4,619 posts)Too busy at work....
Darnit.
spanone
(135,831 posts)F U C K H I M
Rebl2
(13,504 posts)birdographer
(1,327 posts)it was a literal smoldering heap.
Mossfern
(2,497 posts)Is there a way to mark a thread to read later?
Layzeebeaver
(1,623 posts)Mossfern
(2,497 posts)I didn't see that option on the bottom.
Bad eyes.
Cha
(297,210 posts)campaign slogan gets Shot Down by Merrick Garland in the Senate.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,083 posts)is a picture of Josh Hawley. He is epitomizes "sleazy." He makes my skin crawl.
kacekwl
(7,017 posts)now it has to be explained every time some ass like Hawley brings it up. Even though everyone in Congress knows what it means they use it every chance they get to fool their dumb base. Some in the administration communications dept. needs to come up with something else, soon.
OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)with it. It did a lot of damage to the Democratic Party.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)And urged a big edit to that slogan.
Response to Duppers (Reply #38)
ahoysrcsm This message was self-deleted by its author.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)Excuse me - where did the slogan BEGIN??
And many here predicted it could and would be used to slam us.
What Does "Defund the Police" Mean? Here's the Meaning Behind the Rallying Cry
It's a growing call from protestors and activists but what does it actually mean?
Jul 22, 2020
As the United States grapples with the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Elijah McClain, and countless other Black Americans at the hands of racism and police brutality, one rallying cry gained momentum across the country: "Defund the police." You might have seen the phrase written on protest signs, on social media, or even on painted street murals which probably has led you to wonder, what does "defund the police" mean, exactly, and what would it really look like?
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/a33024951/defund-the-police-meaning/
Response to Duppers (Reply #47)
ahoysrcsm This message was self-deleted by its author.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)
Black Lives Matter, Movement for Black Lives, and other activists have used the phrase to call for police budget reductions and to delegate certain police responsibilities to other organizations.[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In Black Reconstruction, first published in 1935, W. E. B. Du Bois wrote about "abolition-democracy", which advocated for the removal of institutions that were rooted in racist and repressive practices, including prisons, convict leasing, and white police forces. In the 1960s, activists such as Angela Davis advocated for the defunding or abolition of police departments.[17] The 2017 book The End of Policing by Alex S. Vitale has been called "... a manual of sorts for the defund movement."
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)He is a younger brighter (low bar) Trump. I would think his little raised fist salute to the January 6 insurrectionists would hamper his ambitions but who knows these days.....millions seem to have taken leave of their senses.
the_sly_pig
(741 posts)Hawley is a tool asking questions and Garland answered the questions. As a matter of fact, Hawley repeatedly made a point of the Obama/Biden Justice Department making false statements to the FISA court to which Garland could not and did not dispute.
So again, where is the "big burn" in this video?
Initech
(100,070 posts)Fuck him.
FlyingPiggy
(3,384 posts)To reality. I would pay good money to have one good whack at his smug little frat face. But this Merrick Garland response burns well enough for me. Lol