Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,799 posts)
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 03:59 AM Feb 2021

Charge dropped against Black man walking on icy Texas street

PLANO, Texas (AP) — A misdemeanor charge has been dropped against a Black man who was arrested last week for walking home on a street during a snowstorm in Texas.

Rodney Reese, 18, was arrested Feb. 16 in Plano and charged with being a pedestrian in the roadway, news outlets reported.

Police said officers received a call about a Black man seen stumbling along in the middle of the snowy street wearing a short-sleeved shirt and were sent to perform a wellness check.

Police released body camera footage of the encounter on Facebook on Friday. In the video, police are seen following Reese and repeatedly asking him where he is going and if he was OK, to which he replies that he is fine and he is on his way home.

Reese told KDFW-TV that he was walking home from his job at a Walmart and didn't stop for the officers because he didn't need their help.

Officers continued to follow Reese for about two minutes before stopping him, telling him they were “doing an investigation” and informing him that he was being detained.

Reese replied “no” and continued walking, but was stopped again. In the video, a brief scuffle is seen as officers attempted to handcuff Reese, who can be heard asking to be released.



https://www.chron.com/news/article/Texas-storm-Abbott-Rodney-Reese-arrested-jaywalk-15969000.php

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charge dropped against Black man walking on icy Texas street (Original Post) RandySF Feb 2021 OP
'charged with being a pedestrian in the roadway,' elleng Feb 2021 #1
And he was moving. They couldn't get him on loitering. no_hypocrisy Feb 2021 #2
walking while black Demovictory9 Feb 2021 #3
They should have offered him a ride. Karadeniz Feb 2021 #4
Of course a person would want to walk in the street where it's been cleared betsuni Feb 2021 #5
LE informs "being detained" stopdiggin Feb 2021 #6
Yes. Voltaire2 Feb 2021 #9
To be clear, it is different to argue a claim stopdiggin Feb 2021 #12
You asked if ignoring these jackasses was an option. Voltaire2 Feb 2021 #14
can't think of a single thing I disagree with in the above stopdiggin Feb 2021 #15
If they were truly police officers behaving in the public interest RVN VET71 Feb 2021 #7
agreed. but a wellness check given the conditions stopdiggin Feb 2021 #13
100% agree. RVN VET71 Feb 2021 #16
fire the cops, then lock them up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Trueblue1968 Feb 2021 #8
fucking racist scum coppers, ugh Celerity Feb 2021 #10
No victory WestIndianArchie Feb 2021 #11

betsuni

(25,488 posts)
5. Of course a person would want to walk in the street where it's been cleared
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 05:55 AM
Feb 2021

or at least less icy than other places.

stopdiggin

(11,302 posts)
12. To be clear, it is different to argue a claim
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 02:55 PM
Feb 2021

that the stop shouldn't be made (a point the police chief completely agreed with) -- to go on to a right to walk away from a 'detained' status.

One of the first things the ACLU, defense attorneys, or any social justice organization teaches is:
"Am I being detained?" Am I free to leave?"

Pretending that the answers to those questions are not important, or don't count -- is really counterproductive.

Voltaire2

(13,027 posts)
14. You asked if ignoring these jackasses was an option.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 05:46 PM
Feb 2021

Of course it was. The jackasses were likely to get physical, because they generally demand obedience, even when they are being obvious jackasses. But noncompliance is always an option.

It was and is an option. Perhaps not a good option. As he was already in the “we are going to make your life miserable” phase of police encounters with POC, it wasn’t really going to do much to change the situation. As far as I can tell, compliance/non-compliance have little to do with outcomes, at least not for POC.

In this situation a person doing no harm to anyone, engaged in legal activities, has the basic right to be left in peace.

stopdiggin

(11,302 posts)
15. can't think of a single thing I disagree with in the above
Wed Feb 24, 2021, 01:08 AM
Feb 2021

Most especially the final sentence.
My priority is in seeing that people make it home alive. That's why I think it is important to listen to people like the ACLU. Know your rights. Exercise your rights. But do try to make it home in one piece.

RVN VET71

(2,690 posts)
7. If they were truly police officers behaving in the public interest
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 06:35 AM
Feb 2021

they would have offered him a ride home, wouldn’t they? I mean “we’re all in this together” right? Even the police chief said they should have just taken the kid home! This must be what the officers felt to be a Texas style "wellness check": if he’s black and able to breathe, arrest him?



stopdiggin

(11,302 posts)
13. agreed. but a wellness check given the conditions
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 03:05 PM
Feb 2021

probably had a sound original premise. Shirtsleeves, bone chilling cold, dark of night ... Could so easily have been somebody that really needed some help.

(walking in the street after a snowstorm is common practice -- generally it's the only place to walk)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charge dropped against Bl...