Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,700 posts)
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 12:02 PM Feb 2021

Whoa! Amy Klobuchar is going for the throat. Insurrection is being confirmed.

Will you agree that this was an organized/coordinated attack on the Capitol?

Yes.

Will you agree that it involved White Supremacists?

Yes.

And now she's connecting what Trump said in his rallies with what happened.

64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whoa! Amy Klobuchar is going for the throat. Insurrection is being confirmed. (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Feb 2021 OP
Good. Riots are spontaneous. Insurrections are planned. Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2021 #1
Now to get the MSM.to stop calling 1/6 a riot uponit7771 Feb 2021 #6
they use "riot" for every fricking thing. soldierant Feb 2021 #51
THIS malaise Feb 2021 #10
"RIOT" and "MILITIA" drive me nutso.... HUAJIAO Feb 2021 #31
Militia does not bother me at all. wnylib Feb 2021 #41
Well, I would call them terrorists. HUAJIAO Feb 2021 #42
But militias are more organized into wnylib Feb 2021 #43
Exactly. plimsoll Feb 2021 #53
Me too. We need to stop quibbling about semantics Tommymac Feb 2021 #52
I love this woman. Amy for Majority Leader! nt Kahuna Feb 2021 #2
Oh, yes. I would love to hear from her regard Moscow Mitch: NCjack Feb 2021 #20
+1 dalton99a Feb 2021 #27
Listening with one ear JustAnotherGen Feb 2021 #3
Who is she asking? DUgosh Feb 2021 #4
Sounds like she was asking a collective response from the security officials Baitball Blogger Feb 2021 #7
One of my favorite Senators! YorkRd Feb 2021 #5
I love her. I just wish Al Franken were there with her (no slam to his replacement, but we hlthe2b Feb 2021 #8
+1 Baitball Blogger Feb 2021 #9
That is unanimously agreed IN HINDSIGHT. Their job was to know an insurrection was coming THEN. ancianita Feb 2021 #11
Which tells me that they're trying to figure out how high up this coordinated effort goes. Baitball Blogger Feb 2021 #13
It came up in the first 5 minutes. When Klobuchar got a "no" from all 3 that they did NOT get ancianita Feb 2021 #16
It's not only how high it goes. It's also to do with specific interference at critical points. Ford_Prefect Feb 2021 #21
Yes, and while DJT wasn't the strategist, that planning was done at his direction. theneworiginal Feb 2021 #24
Right. The main thing is the witting interference and bad judgment at critical points. ancianita Feb 2021 #28
Please share your theory. No text diddlysquat Feb 2021 #23
First, we need to know the names of the JTTF on duty that day. I can't find their names. ancianita Feb 2021 #30
Very detailed. Baitball Blogger Feb 2021 #33
Who are the culprits? ancianita Feb 2021 #34
Who was on that task force? Any Trump 'appointees'? triron Feb 2021 #55
That's exactly my question. I've looked up JTTF and can't find names. Could that be classified? ancianita Feb 2021 #56
Furthermore, JTTF have a reputation for being a thorn in the side of local law enforcement. ancianita Feb 2021 #57
Seems like JTTFs are closely associated with ICE. triron Feb 2021 #62
ICE is only one of their interfaces at Homeland. The main thing: they're not independent of ancianita Feb 2021 #64
Okay. I found one "affiant submission" to U.S. Magistrate Judge, Zia M. Faruqui, that one JTTF ancianita Feb 2021 #58
Thank you, Sen. Amy K! niyad Feb 2021 #12
She's tough as nails, no B.S. questioner. Greybnk48 Feb 2021 #14
I am PROUD to know Amy and have her as my Senator. ProudMNDemocrat Feb 2021 #15
That she is. One of the ones that truly cares. Jay25 Feb 2021 #17
IIRC, she's a Yalie. Went there as undergrad so she was probably in a class that was somewhat CTyankee Feb 2021 #22
Go Amy!!!! BobTheSubgenius Feb 2021 #18
A sterling example of the right way to do it. Oldem Feb 2021 #19
Dems were wise to recruit former prosecutors for Congressional candidates bucolic_frolic Feb 2021 #25
Right on, Amy Klobuchar marieo1 Feb 2021 #26
I watched that earlier. Pongo Feb 2021 #29
Welcome to DU! NT CottonBear Feb 2021 #54
Thank you! I only just discovered the My Posts tab. Pongo Feb 2021 #61
Who is she talking to? nt LAS14 Feb 2021 #32
Capitol Riot was an inside job! Pass it on! Initech Feb 2021 #35
I do think for sure that it was an inside job, but that was not a riot. Pongo Feb 2021 #63
excellent llashram Feb 2021 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author ExTex Feb 2021 #37
alway a possibility llashram Feb 2021 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author AllaN01Bear Feb 2021 #45
After listening to Ron Johnson R-WI I thought the crowd NoMoreRepugs Feb 2021 #38
We need a direct comparison of everything these guys are saying to the BLM protests. brewens Feb 2021 #40
+1 ancianita Feb 2021 #46
i get red in the face. neck veins bulging. teeth clenched , hands in fist, AllaN01Bear Feb 2021 #44
Senator Klobuchar bdamomma Feb 2021 #47
"what Trump said" moondust Feb 2021 #48
GOOD. Get it on the record. calimary Feb 2021 #49
I wanna see tRump's fat ass frying Blue Owl Feb 2021 #50
Get the accomplices within, too. Kid Berwyn Feb 2021 #59
People always forget about the co-conspirators. Baitball Blogger Feb 2021 #60

soldierant

(6,847 posts)
51. they use "riot" for every fricking thing.
Wed Feb 24, 2021, 03:22 AM
Feb 2021

It's not just the "Capitol Riot."

The Greenwood Massacre is to this day known as the "Tulsa Race Riot."

And I know I'm missing many, but that one always pushes my buttons.

wnylib

(21,432 posts)
41. Militia does not bother me at all.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 09:18 PM
Feb 2021

Militias are organized paramilitary groups that operate outside the law, usually composed of thugs working for an ideology and acting as private "armies" for politicians.

The word militia no longer has the same meaning as it did in the 18th century when our constitution was written. That role and term has been replaced by the National Guard.

After the First World War, when Germany was in chaos before the Weimar Republic was firmly established, former soldiers formed militias to maintain "law and order" on behalf of various left and right wing politicians. Hitler got militia support thst, over time, morphed into the SA thugs and then the SS, aka, Gestapo.

So the word militia applies directly to the magat and Qanon thugs who attacked the Capitol.

wnylib

(21,432 posts)
43. But militias are more organized into
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 09:40 PM
Feb 2021

paramilitary units than most terrorists are.

Groups like Al Qaeda and Isis are organized, but they carry out individual acts of terrorism for its own sake, to terrorize. And many terrorists are individuals who act independently. Militias are organized groups with the goal of total overthrow of a government on behalf of a political leader whom they expect to rule when they succeed. They are politicized private armies.

plimsoll

(1,668 posts)
53. Exactly.
Wed Feb 24, 2021, 11:55 AM
Feb 2021

And now we should be calling them paramilitaries. The GOP is the political arm of the white supremacist / Neo Fascist paramilitaries. That was obvious from the moment that federal law enforcement said that the domestic terrorism was a growing threat and the GOP said it shouldn't be pursued because it was aimed at conservatives. Instead of backing down we should have been asking, why the GOP was supporting domestic terrorism.

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
52. Me too. We need to stop quibbling about semantics
Wed Feb 24, 2021, 09:53 AM
Feb 2021

And call them what they are:

DOMESTIC TERRORIST INSURRECTIONISTS.

Baitball Blogger

(46,700 posts)
7. Sounds like she was asking a collective response from the security officials
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 12:07 PM
Feb 2021

who are being interrogated. In other words, the people who would have reviewed the data and know the answers.

Two or three people responded to her question, and one or more were on Zoom.

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
8. I love her. I just wish Al Franken were there with her (no slam to his replacement, but we
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 12:08 PM
Feb 2021

need what Franken could bring).

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
11. That is unanimously agreed IN HINDSIGHT. Their job was to know an insurrection was coming THEN.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 12:37 PM
Feb 2021

What's the difference between them then and them now:

But they got hamstrung by the intermediary JTTF between them and the FBI's intel memo about crowd plans for "war."

THAT is the reason they say yes now. But they couldn't say yes then because FBI intel was kept from them.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
16. It came up in the first 5 minutes. When Klobuchar got a "no" from all 3 that they did NOT get
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 12:49 PM
Feb 2021

the FBI's Jan 5 intel. BUT one of them said it was the Joint Terrorism Task Force that got the FBI's intel report. THEY are the entity that should have passed it along (coordinated) to all 3 here but DID NOT.

So. NOW they know. But THEN they were kept from knowing by the JTTF. Why? I have a theory.

Ford_Prefect

(7,886 posts)
21. It's not only how high it goes. It's also to do with specific interference at critical points.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 01:24 PM
Feb 2021

It's clear that there was planned and coordinated interference which was designed to amplify institutional inertia and to hamstring decision making before and during the crisis. I think when we tease out enough of the details this will look very coordinated and thought out by minds more clever and sinister that DJT.

To me it smells a lot like what the Russians did in destabilizing Ukraine. Yes, I say this often. I say it because so much of the pattern and the specifics map out that way, and because some of the same players are working behind the scenes. DJT isn't a clever strategist. This took the kind of mind that thinks 20 moves or more ahead, not a reactive, defensive paranoid who has no head for details.

theneworiginal

(302 posts)
24. Yes, and while DJT wasn't the strategist, that planning was done at his direction.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 01:32 PM
Feb 2021

Anything tRump does has Russian fingerprints on it.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
28. Right. The main thing is the witting interference and bad judgment at critical points.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 01:36 PM
Feb 2021

Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2021, 02:11 PM - Edit history (1)

Right now, one critical point was the Joint Terrorism Task Force for Capitol Police.
JTTF is a law enforcement interface branch of the FBI.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
30. First, we need to know the names of the JTTF on duty that day. I can't find their names.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 01:56 PM
Feb 2021

Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2021, 04:44 PM - Edit history (1)

My theory is based on two proclivities shown by the FBI in the past -- being Republicans, and having race bias. JTTF is connected to the FBI. Here's an overview from wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Terrorism_Task_Force

If we could know the JTTF taskforce names on duty that day, we'd know their performance records and bios and political affiliation(s).

Then they could be questioned by the Klobuchar's oversight committee on
-- what their job is,
--what they knew (the FBI memo),
-- when they knew it, and
-- why they did not forward the FBI intel they knew to all capitol law enforcement.

My theory is that they decided that a white crowd talking "war" online
-- was not to be taken as dangerous, just social media chatter, not mobilization;
-- would not actually bring lethal arms to the capitol;
-- would get the president's backup control if they misjudged the crowd's actions (lol);
-- would not hurt anyone during the capitol Ellipse rally, march, or possible entry into the Capitol.

Furthermore, if JTTF were to swear under oath in Klobuchar's next hearing,
-- they would likely not say any of this;
-- they would not admit their pro-white racial bias (unless asked if they would forward this intel if it were about BLM saying the same and mobilizing online), perhaps because they believe they're not aware of it;
-- they would simply claim they misjudged the need to forward this intel and their recommendations to the LEO's of the Capitol. AND

There would be no followup drill down by the committee on WHY they think they "misjudged" that need to forward their intel.

DUMB is what intel and law enforcement play when they fail to coordinate. For all their jargon and sidestepping knowledge ("I'm not aware," "No one contacted me" ) they play DUMB.

And Americans end up DEAD. The fact that THIS time it was directed at Congress does not mean that Americans will enjoy any trickle down restructuring of the Intel-Enforcement nationwide.

I could be wrong, and hope I'm wrong. But that's my theory -- the pro-white bias of the Republican FBI and law enforcement.

Baitball Blogger

(46,700 posts)
33. Very detailed.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 03:27 PM
Feb 2021

I got the impression they know where they're going with this investigation. The first round may be just to put the culprits on the record.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
56. That's exactly my question. I've looked up JTTF and can't find names. Could that be classified?
Fri Feb 26, 2021, 12:42 PM
Feb 2021

The issue is that they and their judgment were the weak link breakdown on hardening up capitol law enforcement.

After Contee stated that JTTF got the intel from the FBI, that fact suddenly disappeared from the entire committee questioning.

It went right over their heads. Klobuchar, if she caught that, would do well to call them to her next federal level hearing and question them -- what did they know, where did they get it from, who were they supposed to pass it to, and why didn't they.

IF she calls JTTF, then we'll know their names. Maybe. They might not even be the JTTF personnel on duty that day, just their bosses. In which case they'll give answers that are no answers.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
57. Furthermore, JTTF have a reputation for being a thorn in the side of local law enforcement.
Fri Feb 26, 2021, 12:50 PM
Feb 2021
FBI Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs) inflict harm on local communities through racial profiling, harassment, suspicionless surveillance and investigations, and exploitation of immigration enforcement, all of which are authorized under federal guidelines loosened after 9/11.

The FBI relies on the labor of state and local law enforcement officers assigned to the JTTFs, who agree to follow federal guidelines even if they conflict with state and local law, policies, and regulations.

Civil rights advocates and community groups in Portland, San Francisco, and Oakland organized successful campaigns and lobbying operations to demand that their city legislatures hold local police accountable to local laws and ultimately withdraw from the JTTFs when the FBI refused to allow such public accountability


https://www.brennancenter.org/events/bad-partners-why-local-law-enforcement-should-leave-fbi-joint-terrorism-task-forces

They are the weak link that keep pro-white bias cockblocking local, and in this case, federal; they kept law enforcement from taking preventive measures against the militants whose goal is to assassinate congressional leaders and keep white minority rule at federal and state levels.

JTTF itself needs an external investigation by Congress.

triron

(21,999 posts)
62. Seems like JTTFs are closely associated with ICE.
Fri Feb 26, 2021, 03:28 PM
Feb 2021

There's a red flag right there, especially so under Trump.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
64. ICE is only one of their interfaces at Homeland. The main thing: they're not independent of
Fri Feb 26, 2021, 04:30 PM
Feb 2021

the FBI mission, which is "Threat Assessment." But they kind of are, and because of their pro-white bias, pick and choose who to define as "threat." And it's not militias, accelerationists (part of Nazi activity), right wing media owners or trumpculters.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
58. Okay. I found one "affiant submission" to U.S. Magistrate Judge, Zia M. Faruqui, that one JTTF
Fri Feb 26, 2021, 01:01 PM
Feb 2021

guy claims he was on JTTF duty on Jan. 6. Since his name is blacked out, the JTTF's Jan 6 personnel on duty must be classified or sealed per some stipulation legalese.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/page/file/1355126/download

If any investigations of Congress take place, they will HAVE to have the names of JTTF on duty and names of those who their direct lines of intel communication. We know who SAY they didn't get the FBI's intel. Now we need to know names of who had that intel and did not pass it on, or if they did, who of local LE are lying.

CTyankee

(63,903 posts)
22. IIRC, she's a Yalie. Went there as undergrad so she was probably in a class that was somewhat
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 01:25 PM
Feb 2021

used to the idea of an all male undergraduate class. I'm old enough to remember those days and the first few women who were in classes at the all male Ivies had some grouchy fellow students...

Oldem

(833 posts)
19. A sterling example of the right way to do it.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 01:19 PM
Feb 2021

When repug questioners have the floor, they sound tough and ask bs questions based on bs foundations. Sen. Klobuchar, AOC, and other Dem questioners like them, nail peoples' feet to the floor, based of fact.

bucolic_frolic

(43,128 posts)
25. Dems were wise to recruit former prosecutors for Congressional candidates
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 01:32 PM
Feb 2021

They have the skillset and experience to interrogate.

 

Pongo

(4,170 posts)
61. Thank you! I only just discovered the My Posts tab.
Fri Feb 26, 2021, 03:06 PM
Feb 2021

I’ve been reading here for awhile, but of course never saw that because I wasn’t a member. So now I’m trying to catch up with any responses I missed.

 

Pongo

(4,170 posts)
63. I do think for sure that it was an inside job, but that was not a riot.
Fri Feb 26, 2021, 03:46 PM
Feb 2021

That was a planned insurrection.

llashram

(6,265 posts)
36. excellent
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 04:59 PM
Feb 2021

1/6 was a serious attempt to overthrow our government. If they had found Speaker Pelosi, she would have been toast. I think if they had found pence, they would NOT have killed him in spite of their shouts. No matter what trump had said. He was/is a white male with a mastery of lying. He would have first, with an experienced politicians' mastery of rhetoric, talked his way out of it. Second, they would have let him go.

AOC? Toast. And any other brown skinned female and/or recognizable member of the Democratic Party. They would have been toast. With the insurrectionist's killing them on live television.

Goodman was a true soldier who did his duty. Honorably.

All this "riot" bullshit by the media describing 1/6 is the attempted managing of this event. To keep our reputation as "the shining city on the hill" unsullied. I am so ashamed. These clowns shitting on the floor sullied things. Trashing, spitting, dishonoring what I fought for as the good our government does for all Americans. Malcolm Nance also speaks truth on a Meidas Touch video on home page. I think.

Response to llashram (Reply #36)

llashram

(6,265 posts)
39. alway a possibility
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 07:00 PM
Feb 2021

they are a hateful segment of society with an extremely false and flawed morality/mentality. A large majority of them consider themselves Christan. So yeah they might have hung pence on the south lawn....on live television.

Response to llashram (Reply #36)

NoMoreRepugs

(9,412 posts)
38. After listening to Ron Johnson R-WI I thought the crowd
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 06:44 PM
Feb 2021

was more like a sampling from a typical day at DisneyWorld. How much meth is he using???

brewens

(13,574 posts)
40. We need a direct comparison of everything these guys are saying to the BLM protests.
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 09:09 PM
Feb 2021

Show what actions based on "intelligence" were taken for BLM versus the insurrection. Maybe guys running around with their hair on fire urging an overwhelming law enforcement presence for BLM based on a much lower threat? It's gonna stink to high heaven. They have no explanation for that. Word was given to let it happen and probably facilitate and we're going to find out how and by who.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
48. "what Trump said"
Tue Feb 23, 2021, 11:54 PM
Feb 2021
~
Cohen has said Trump “doesn’t give orders. He speaks in code. And I understand that code.” That’s the way that Mafiosi speak to each other, to avoid trouble.
~
Popular culture shows how mobsters communicate in code when they are worried about being overheard by law enforcement, using indirect language to describe their intentions, so as to make it harder to pin responsibility on them.
~
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/02/28/how-trump-speaks-like-mob-boss/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whoa! Amy Klobuchar is go...