General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhoa! Amy Klobuchar is going for the throat. Insurrection is being confirmed.
Will you agree that this was an organized/coordinated attack on the Capitol?
Yes.
Will you agree that it involved White Supremacists?
Yes.
And now she's connecting what Trump said in his rallies with what happened.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)soldierant
(6,847 posts)It's not just the "Capitol Riot."
The Greenwood Massacre is to this day known as the "Tulsa Race Riot."
And I know I'm missing many, but that one always pushes my buttons.
malaise
(268,930 posts)I scream every time I hear or read it described as a riot
HUAJIAO
(2,383 posts)wnylib
(21,432 posts)Militias are organized paramilitary groups that operate outside the law, usually composed of thugs working for an ideology and acting as private "armies" for politicians.
The word militia no longer has the same meaning as it did in the 18th century when our constitution was written. That role and term has been replaced by the National Guard.
After the First World War, when Germany was in chaos before the Weimar Republic was firmly established, former soldiers formed militias to maintain "law and order" on behalf of various left and right wing politicians. Hitler got militia support thst, over time, morphed into the SA thugs and then the SS, aka, Gestapo.
So the word militia applies directly to the magat and Qanon thugs who attacked the Capitol.
HUAJIAO
(2,383 posts)wnylib
(21,432 posts)paramilitary units than most terrorists are.
Groups like Al Qaeda and Isis are organized, but they carry out individual acts of terrorism for its own sake, to terrorize. And many terrorists are individuals who act independently. Militias are organized groups with the goal of total overthrow of a government on behalf of a political leader whom they expect to rule when they succeed. They are politicized private armies.
And now we should be calling them paramilitaries. The GOP is the political arm of the white supremacist / Neo Fascist paramilitaries. That was obvious from the moment that federal law enforcement said that the domestic terrorism was a growing threat and the GOP said it shouldn't be pursued because it was aimed at conservatives. Instead of backing down we should have been asking, why the GOP was supporting domestic terrorism.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)And call them what they are:
DOMESTIC TERRORIST INSURRECTIONISTS.
Kahuna
(27,311 posts)NCjack
(10,279 posts)"... but, he persisted!"
JustAnotherGen
(31,810 posts)She keeps going. She's not going to stop.
DUgosh
(3,055 posts)For those without a stream
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)who are being interrogated. In other words, the people who would have reviewed the data and know the answers.
Two or three people responded to her question, and one or more were on Zoom.
YorkRd
(326 posts)hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)need what Franken could bring).
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)ancianita
(36,023 posts)What's the difference between them then and them now:
But they got hamstrung by the intermediary JTTF between them and the FBI's intel memo about crowd plans for "war."
THAT is the reason they say yes now. But they couldn't say yes then because FBI intel was kept from them.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)ancianita
(36,023 posts)the FBI's Jan 5 intel. BUT one of them said it was the Joint Terrorism Task Force that got the FBI's intel report. THEY are the entity that should have passed it along (coordinated) to all 3 here but DID NOT.
So. NOW they know. But THEN they were kept from knowing by the JTTF. Why? I have a theory.
Ford_Prefect
(7,886 posts)It's clear that there was planned and coordinated interference which was designed to amplify institutional inertia and to hamstring decision making before and during the crisis. I think when we tease out enough of the details this will look very coordinated and thought out by minds more clever and sinister that DJT.
To me it smells a lot like what the Russians did in destabilizing Ukraine. Yes, I say this often. I say it because so much of the pattern and the specifics map out that way, and because some of the same players are working behind the scenes. DJT isn't a clever strategist. This took the kind of mind that thinks 20 moves or more ahead, not a reactive, defensive paranoid who has no head for details.
theneworiginal
(302 posts)Anything tRump does has Russian fingerprints on it.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2021, 02:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Right now, one critical point was the Joint Terrorism Task Force for Capitol Police.
JTTF is a law enforcement interface branch of the FBI.
diddlysquat
(1,156 posts)ancianita
(36,023 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 23, 2021, 04:44 PM - Edit history (1)
My theory is based on two proclivities shown by the FBI in the past -- being Republicans, and having race bias. JTTF is connected to the FBI. Here's an overview from wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Terrorism_Task_Force
If we could know the JTTF taskforce names on duty that day, we'd know their performance records and bios and political affiliation(s).
Then they could be questioned by the Klobuchar's oversight committee on
-- what their job is,
--what they knew (the FBI memo),
-- when they knew it, and
-- why they did not forward the FBI intel they knew to all capitol law enforcement.
My theory is that they decided that a white crowd talking "war" online
-- was not to be taken as dangerous, just social media chatter, not mobilization;
-- would not actually bring lethal arms to the capitol;
-- would get the president's backup control if they misjudged the crowd's actions (lol);
-- would not hurt anyone during the capitol Ellipse rally, march, or possible entry into the Capitol.
Furthermore, if JTTF were to swear under oath in Klobuchar's next hearing,
-- they would likely not say any of this;
-- they would not admit their pro-white racial bias (unless asked if they would forward this intel if it were about BLM saying the same and mobilizing online), perhaps because they believe they're not aware of it;
-- they would simply claim they misjudged the need to forward this intel and their recommendations to the LEO's of the Capitol. AND
There would be no followup drill down by the committee on WHY they think they "misjudged" that need to forward their intel.
DUMB is what intel and law enforcement play when they fail to coordinate. For all their jargon and sidestepping knowledge ("I'm not aware," "No one contacted me" ) they play DUMB.
And Americans end up DEAD. The fact that THIS time it was directed at Congress does not mean that Americans will enjoy any trickle down restructuring of the Intel-Enforcement nationwide.
I could be wrong, and hope I'm wrong. But that's my theory -- the pro-white bias of the Republican FBI and law enforcement.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)I got the impression they know where they're going with this investigation. The first round may be just to put the culprits on the record.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)triron
(21,999 posts)ancianita
(36,023 posts)The issue is that they and their judgment were the weak link breakdown on hardening up capitol law enforcement.
After Contee stated that JTTF got the intel from the FBI, that fact suddenly disappeared from the entire committee questioning.
It went right over their heads. Klobuchar, if she caught that, would do well to call them to her next federal level hearing and question them -- what did they know, where did they get it from, who were they supposed to pass it to, and why didn't they.
IF she calls JTTF, then we'll know their names. Maybe. They might not even be the JTTF personnel on duty that day, just their bosses. In which case they'll give answers that are no answers.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)The FBI relies on the labor of state and local law enforcement officers assigned to the JTTFs, who agree to follow federal guidelines even if they conflict with state and local law, policies, and regulations.
Civil rights advocates and community groups in Portland, San Francisco, and Oakland organized successful campaigns and lobbying operations to demand that their city legislatures hold local police accountable to local laws and ultimately withdraw from the JTTFs when the FBI refused to allow such public accountability
https://www.brennancenter.org/events/bad-partners-why-local-law-enforcement-should-leave-fbi-joint-terrorism-task-forces
They are the weak link that keep pro-white bias cockblocking local, and in this case, federal; they kept law enforcement from taking preventive measures against the militants whose goal is to assassinate congressional leaders and keep white minority rule at federal and state levels.
JTTF itself needs an external investigation by Congress.
triron
(21,999 posts)There's a red flag right there, especially so under Trump.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)the FBI mission, which is "Threat Assessment." But they kind of are, and because of their pro-white bias, pick and choose who to define as "threat." And it's not militias, accelerationists (part of Nazi activity), right wing media owners or trumpculters.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)guy claims he was on JTTF duty on Jan. 6. Since his name is blacked out, the JTTF's Jan 6 personnel on duty must be classified or sealed per some stipulation legalese.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/page/file/1355126/download
If any investigations of Congress take place, they will HAVE to have the names of JTTF on duty and names of those who their direct lines of intel communication. We know who SAY they didn't get the FBI's intel. Now we need to know names of who had that intel and did not pass it on, or if they did, who of local LE are lying.
niyad
(113,259 posts)Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)I love it!
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,783 posts)She is needed in the Senate. That is for sure.
Jay25
(417 posts)CTyankee
(63,903 posts)used to the idea of an all male undergraduate class. I'm old enough to remember those days and the first few women who were in classes at the all male Ivies had some grouchy fellow students...
BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)Rip 'em to bits!
Oldem
(833 posts)When repug questioners have the floor, they sound tough and ask bs questions based on bs foundations. Sen. Klobuchar, AOC, and other Dem questioners like them, nail peoples' feet to the floor, based of fact.
bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)They have the skillset and experience to interrogate.
marieo1
(1,402 posts)Amy Klobuchar is from Minnesota and she is the best.
Pongo
(4,170 posts)Shes damn good.
CottonBear
(21,596 posts)Pongo
(4,170 posts)Ive been reading here for awhile, but of course never saw that because I wasnt a member. So now Im trying to catch up with any responses I missed.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)Initech
(100,063 posts)Pongo
(4,170 posts)That was a planned insurrection.
llashram
(6,265 posts)1/6 was a serious attempt to overthrow our government. If they had found Speaker Pelosi, she would have been toast. I think if they had found pence, they would NOT have killed him in spite of their shouts. No matter what trump had said. He was/is a white male with a mastery of lying. He would have first, with an experienced politicians' mastery of rhetoric, talked his way out of it. Second, they would have let him go.
AOC? Toast. And any other brown skinned female and/or recognizable member of the Democratic Party. They would have been toast. With the insurrectionist's killing them on live television.
Goodman was a true soldier who did his duty. Honorably.
All this "riot" bullshit by the media describing 1/6 is the attempted managing of this event. To keep our reputation as "the shining city on the hill" unsullied. I am so ashamed. These clowns shitting on the floor sullied things. Trashing, spitting, dishonoring what I fought for as the good our government does for all Americans. Malcolm Nance also speaks truth on a Meidas Touch video on home page. I think.
Response to llashram (Reply #36)
ExTex This message was self-deleted by its author.
llashram
(6,265 posts)they are a hateful segment of society with an extremely false and flawed morality/mentality. A large majority of them consider themselves Christan. So yeah they might have hung pence on the south lawn....on live television.
Response to llashram (Reply #36)
AllaN01Bear This message was self-deleted by its author.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,412 posts)was more like a sampling from a typical day at DisneyWorld. How much meth is he using???
brewens
(13,574 posts)Show what actions based on "intelligence" were taken for BLM versus the insurrection. Maybe guys running around with their hair on fire urging an overwhelming law enforcement presence for BLM based on a much lower threat? It's gonna stink to high heaven. They have no explanation for that. Word was given to let it happen and probably facilitate and we're going to find out how and by who.
AllaN01Bear
(18,159 posts)"this was not a riot!!!!!!!!"
bdamomma
(63,836 posts)is great, really admire her. Chairwoman too.
moondust
(19,972 posts)Cohen has said Trump doesnt give orders. He speaks in code. And I understand that code. Thats the way that Mafiosi speak to each other, to avoid trouble.
~
Popular culture shows how mobsters communicate in code when they are worried about being overheard by law enforcement, using indirect language to describe their intentions, so as to make it harder to pin responsibility on them.
~
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/02/28/how-trump-speaks-like-mob-boss/
calimary
(81,220 posts)Blue Owl
(50,349 posts)Kid Berwyn
(14,876 posts)Conspirators from both the Senate and the House.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)They are not just enablers. They also keep hate alive.