Should all the convicted insurrectionists be imprisoned at Gitmo?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

19 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes
	12 (63%)
	No
	7 (37%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[drray23]

1. Absolutely not.

Gitmo is an abberation and should be shut down. We have federal prisons on the mainland which will do just fine.

[enough]

3. Thanks. Appalling that anyone thinks this would be a good thing. NT

[TwilightZone]

9. Agreed.

[Ocelot II]

2. Absolutely not. What a horrible idea.

It shouldn’t have existed in the first place. It should be shut down.

[lagomorph777]

4. Yes - Clear out the remaining un-charged people, and use it for domestic terrorists such as Trump.

[RainCaster]

5. NO - close that place and give it back to Cuba

The fact that we own such a place is an embarrassment. Be done with it.

[Wounded Bear]

15. Yes, close the Gitmo prison camp, but no to "giving it back to Cuba"...

Guantanamo Bay is an important Caribbean naval base.

[Eugene]

6. Justice can be served by following the law. Nobody should be held at Gitmo.

[Ocelot II]

14. Exactly.

Prosecute them in our criminal courts pursuant to the law, then sentence them to an appropriate prison in accordance with the sentencing guidelines. We've always advocated for affording due process to the foreign alleged terrorists (who are currently rotting in Gitmo without even a trial) by prosecuting them in our criminal courts and, if they are found guilty, sending them to a US prison. If Zacarias Moussaoui, Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, shoe bomber Richard Reid, and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the underwear bomber, along with some 400 other foreign terrorists, can be held in US prisons, so can the Capitol defendants. Gitmo is an atrocity that should have been shut down years ago.

[Lucky Luciano]

7. Doesn't have to be Gitmo, but Florence Supermax solitary confinement for life works for me!

[old guy]

8. Absolutely.

It would be the one sure way to get it closed. You start sending white repubs there and it would be shut down post haste.

[IbogaProject]

10. I say no more GITMO

I voted for the traitors to go to GITMO, but that just kicks the can, when this needs to be shut down.

What I do suggest is long sentences with tails, parole and them peeing in a cup 3x per week for years. All these traitors should not be allowed to drink for decades.

I voted wrong on this b4 my initial post, then I saw undo, so now I fixed it and this post.

[Solly Mack]

11. Fuck no.

Sheesh

[relayerbob]

12. Get them off our soil

... and revoke their citizenship so that when/if they are released, they are deported to somewhere that will take them. We have no need for domestic terrorists to further incite the next generation of terrorists

[mitch96]

13. Good or bad the place is EXPENSIVE to run from what I've read..

If true the money could be spent in better places... YMMV
m

[LeftInTX]

16. I checked Yes, but I'm being snarky...

It would be nice to give them a taste of their own medicine, but in reality it's a horrible idea. We can't send US citizens to Gitmo.
I'm sure this motley crew supported Gitmo for all non-citizens. I'm sure they support Gitmo for all assylum seekers and dreamers.

It would be nice to see them stripped of their rights, but what goes around comes around...

[Tommy Carcetti]

17. No.

Next question.