Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(112,539 posts)
Sat Feb 27, 2021, 09:04 AM Feb 2021

Before we can have any "bi-partisanship"...

...we must admit there is partisanship on both sides.

Politics can make strange bedfellows, we have heard? But seldom has there been a time more critical than now for "bi-partisanship".

We need "bi-partisanship" for numerous reasons. First and foremost is to make sure they work and debate in the public's service. If there is a disaster somewhere in our country, anywhere in our country, then we want to be sure that our elected officials are working together to solve the people's needs or necessities. That is a primary reason "bi-partisanship" is needed.

However, the times call for a new type of "bi-partisanship". There is a domestic enemy in our midst. It is fascist and promotes the "Big Lie" as a propaganda tool to tear down our democracy. We must do battle to stop our nation from becoming a Third World country living under a dictatorship. That is why we must unite with the other Party to fight. It is in our common interest and the security interest of the United States.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Before we can have any "bi-partisanship"... (Original Post) kentuck Feb 2021 OP
first, we need an agreed definition. NewHendoLib Feb 2021 #1
True. kentuck Feb 2021 #2
Fine. There is partisanship on both sides. Now what? Midnight Writer Feb 2021 #3

NewHendoLib

(60,433 posts)
1. first, we need an agreed definition.
Sat Feb 27, 2021, 09:35 AM
Feb 2021

currently, conservatives see it as bending ro their will no matter which is in the majority. Liberals see it as including them on the decision process, then moving forward with the best idea.

Those 2 definitions don't sync. The media holds each side to different standards as well

kentuck

(112,539 posts)
2. True.
Sat Feb 27, 2021, 09:57 AM
Feb 2021

Last edited Sat Feb 27, 2021, 10:44 AM - Edit history (1)

They can never accept the social agenda of the Democrats, just as the Democrats could never support many issues of the Republicans.

But it is more important than that. It is beyond Democrat vs Republican. It is about the survival of our democracy.

That is the enemy they need to unite to fight.

It is a mistake to underestimate the strength of this fascist movement led by Trump & Associates.

He never gives up. He must be defeated.

It is important that we work together as patriotic Americans.

Midnight Writer

(22,885 posts)
3. Fine. There is partisanship on both sides. Now what?
Sat Feb 27, 2021, 04:02 PM
Feb 2021

It's like a marriage where one spouse is out every night drinking and cheating, and the other spouse says "I could have done more to keep them happy at home".

The responsibility ultimately lies with the malefactor.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Before we can have any "b...