General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Blame Trump' defense in Capitol riot looks like a long shot
The Trump-made-me-do-it defense is already looking like a longshot.
Facing damning evidence in the deadly Capitol siege last month including social media posts flaunting their actions rioters are arguing in court they were following then-President Donald Trump's instructions on Jan. 6. But the legal strategy has already been shot down by at least one judge and experts believe the argument is not likely to get anyone off the hook for the insurrection where five people died, including a police officer.
This purported defense, if recognized, would undermine the rule of law because then, just like a king or a dictator, the president could dictate whats illegal and what isnt in this country," U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said recently in ordering pretrial detention of William Chrestman, a suspected member of the Kansas City-area chapter of the Proud Boys. And that is not how we operate here.
Chrestmans attorneys argued in court papers that Trump gave the mob explicit permission and encouragement to do what they did, providing those who obeyed him with a viable defense against criminal liability.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/blame-trump-defense-in-capitol-riot-looks-like-a-long-shot/ar-BB1e4uGY?li=BBnb7Kz
Just following orders eh?
Ocelot II
(115,943 posts)bullimiami
(13,111 posts)You. Because you committed a crime.
The inciter? Maybe but thats a ballgame of its own.
BeyondGeography
(39,392 posts)katmondoo
(6,457 posts)crickets
(25,989 posts)paleotn
(17,997 posts)versus a classic Nuremberg defense of acting under orders, no matter how heinous.
world wide wally
(21,758 posts)Now what do you have to say, MAGAT?