General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo we really need the Senate Parliamentarian when we have the Senate President?
There has been historical precedent(s) as cited by Ro Khanna, where the Senate Parliamentarian was overruled by the Prez. In this age of unprecedented economic hardship and staggering income equality, is it really that radical to increase the minimum wage? Now we all know there are only *two* ways it can be done: a) via reconciliation and b) via ending the filibuster. Pelosi and Schumer realize it, not sure what's going in WH... Any comments?
Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)If a government cannot respond to a national emergency in a timely manner then we are still not governable.
The experts agree on the course of action, but we are still stymied.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)passes Congress. I would like to see the filibuster gone...make Senators vote and not hide behind it. But there is no way presently to do this. We need more Senators.
GentleAlien
(57 posts)Filibuster will remain, preventing Dems from pursuing their agenda. Passing progressive ideas via reconciliation seems to be a long shot too, at this point. What's left? Executive order? Apparently they last for 1,2 presidential terms, and are swiftly undone after a change-election.
Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,869 posts)has an impartial, expert parliamentarian. Its the rules themselves that are screwed up, not her interpretation.
Fullduplexxx
(7,854 posts)Just fire the parliamentarian like trent Lott did and find another more agreeable one
SCantiGOP
(13,869 posts)I would rather use that procedure than fire someone for doing their job.
Fullduplexxx
(7,854 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,854 posts)Who will give us the main wage hike...
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)package done...get out and elect more senators in 22.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)meet the requirements...neither will the voting rights bill, the immigration bill ...all sorts of things. We need more Senators who are willing to end the filibuster...we have opportunities in 22.
Fullduplexxx
(7,854 posts)Congressional elections
moonscape
(4,673 posts)not needing to lose a single vote, and keep the 50 together as much as possible for so much that needs to be done. Alienating any one member could be disaster. There was speculation at one point in the past that Manchin might become a Republican and that would be a disaster.
We need to gain 2 seats in the Senate to be able to get rid of the filibuster.
I dont think this is only about the Parliamentarian. Getting a bipartisan bill that includes a number of things, and compromises with a $13 min wage which Manchin would support, and even a couple/few Republicans, could be the better play. This covid relief needs to get out stat without getting derailed.
No perfect solution, thats sure.
Celerity
(43,299 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)..in our search for something to blame.
YES. We Do Need The Parlimentarian
"In this age of unprecedented economic hardship and staggering income equality,.."
Pass the $1400 ffs, & find another legislative way to get the Min Wage thru.
They ALL knew the votes weren't there for $15.
It was evident early on.
GentleAlien
(57 posts)I think she has enough of a pulse on public sentiment to not drop the ball on this one.
As Bernie pointed out, there aren't *many* ways of doing it, only two: it's either reconciliation or end-of-filibuster!
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)the GOP takes back the house in 22 then we are screwed.
AZProgressive
(29,322 posts)Biden Can Single-Handedly Run The Reconciliation Process: Parliamentarian Experts (VIDEO)
Two experts in the arcane rules of the Senate said on Monday that, as president of the Senate, Biden has the capacity not just to overrule any ruling that the parliamentarian may make but also to cut off efforts by Republicans to offer unlimited amendments.
Ultimately its the Vice President of the United States [who has the power over the reconciliation process], Robert Dove, who served as Senate parliamentarian on and off from 1981-2001, told MSNBC this morning. It is the decision of the Vice President whether or not to play a role here... And I have seen Vice Presidents play that role in other very important situations... The parliamentarian can only advise. It is the vice president who rules.
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_481031
The title Senate parliamentarian is so distinguished that one might easily assume it dates back to the 18th century. In fact, the post was created in 1935 in revolt against John Nance Garner, the vice president who famously said his office wasnt worth a bucket of warm piss and who apparently worked out his frustrations by rendering as president of the Senate questionable parliamentary rulings. Only three people held the post before Frumin and Doves 28-year do-si-do. According to Dove, Vice President Hubert Humphrey routinely ignored his parliamentarians advice. Might Vice President Joe Biden do the same with health care? Dove sees it as a more plausible prospect with Biden than it might be with other vice presidents because Biden (like Humphrey) is a former senator who can draw on personal familiarity with Senate procedure. Hes also (I would add) kind of a know-it-all, an annoying quality in many contexts but a potentially useful one here.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2009/09/romancing-alan-frumin-the-senate-parliamentarian.html
These articles are from when Biden was VP but the excerpts answers your question.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)or wind up with Mitch as the majority leader when Manchuin switches sides.
GentleAlien
(57 posts)So Dems will have to continue compromising their agenda so he doesn't switch sides? Imagine how well this excuse will work in 2022?
In case of a permanent threat like this, I would say a Trumpian Populism might be the answer: I am sure folks in WV are hurting as bad as those in say MI. May be it's time to rile up public support on Manchin's home turf.
elections have consequences. Its still better to have Chuck as majority leader because Mitch wouldn't bring anything to a vote at all. But yes, the Senate no more liberal than its 50th most liberal Senator.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)GentleAlien
(57 posts)That Biden was al-least 'trying'. GOP did that with Bush Tax cuts. Why couldn't the Dems do it? Now both figures on the left and right are saying 'they just wanted an excuse to not raise the minimum wage, and found one'. Way to go about 2022 IMHO..
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)have learned why you vote blue not matter what. We need to work hard in the midterms to elect Democrats.
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)overruled period so lets get on with it.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,323 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)GentleAlien
(57 posts)and make Senators vote!
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,119 posts)GentleAlien
(57 posts)I do want to use the "unprecedented times call for unprecedented measures" line.. but I know I will be accused of shifting the goal post..