General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPractical considerations aside, what should the minimum wage be today?
This is intended as an abstract question. Please don't factor in considerations like political feasibility, or immediate economic disruption (i.e., a sharp overnight increase in the minimum wage would be a painful adjustment). I'm just wondering what people think is morally appropriate.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,811 posts)be a living wage, which is something economists can figure out. In reality, that number varies considerably across the country. Maybe the compromise would be whatever would be the median for a living wage in this country, which means workers in high cost of living places would not do as well. As it is, individual states can and do have higher minimum wages. Also some cities have higher ones.
rampartc
(5,383 posts)a typical home economics text circa 1960 would suggest a budget of 25% of net income for rent. if rent on a modest apartment is $1000 per month, i don't think wages of $1000 per week are unreasonable.
struggle4progress
(118,214 posts)which works out to be about $10.75 - $10.90 today, depending on the inflation calculator I use
The minimum wage in 1960 was $1.00/hour which works out to be about $8.90 - $12.90 today, depending on the inflation calculator I use
It should be at least $11/hours
dugog55
(296 posts)the large majority of people earning minimum wage were teenagers working fast food joints or menial jobs in stores, etc... Gas station attendants were men making a living for their families, as were people working almost any other job that now only pays minimum wage. I honestly do not remember anyone over 18 or 20 years of age getting the minimum. Milkmen, store clerks, receptionists, secretaries, mechanics, you name it, they were making enough to raise a family.
Of course, health insurance and/or hospital costs were next to nothing back then. A friend of mine broke his arm in 1972 and complained it cost him $125 for the ER visit, x-rays and the cast. You can add all the inflation values to that total that you want, and it will come nowhere near the cost of that visit would be today.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)enough to cover cost of living let alone raise a family. Maybe women jobs looked different than men jobs as far as pay went.
GemDigger
(4,305 posts)15 would be acceptable where rent, food and whatnot are not that high. 15 is not acceptable in places where rent for 1 br apts go for 1500+. If you have kids, tack on more money for the second or third bedroom
Food is another factor. Here, on Jan 1st, everything went up. A gallon of milk went up $1.00, bread, canned goods, meats, everything went up.
15 was good before Covid but Covid made everything more expensive. 15 is no longer enough.
Everyone that supplies basic needs got greedier and greedier until they too are sucking the people dry.
Edite: In some places 15 will let you live like a king and other places like a pauper.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)LizBeth
(9,952 posts)17 would allow me not to be afraid. I have not been out to dinner, picked up fast food or gotten a coffee since middle of May. That should not be an expected way for a person to live. It cannot be, it won't happen mostly. For me it has become a challenge so kinda a game.
KPN
(15,635 posts)rent in anything but a run down dive in many places, dependable transportation, healthy meals, sufficient clothing to cover the 4 seasons as well as work vs leisure, medical expenses, basic utilities, and other typically normal sundries. It really should be more like $25-30/hour for a single person.
There is no easy, one size fits all answer. The best answer is to peg it to cost of living for the locale -- what the federal government does for federal salaries/wages.
It may be more practical to come up with a way to create an additional tax employers whose employees must depend on public assistance (food stamps or other) to make ends meet sufficient to offset these public costs. We already do such things with tobacco and alcohol taxes.
Bayard
(22,004 posts)Which is the normal person working 40 hours a week. I don't see how anyone survives on $14,000 a year, although the two of us aren't making much more than that now on Social Security. When do those of us depending on SS get a raise?
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)dawg
(10,621 posts)and then permanently indexed to inflation.
High income locations could then pass higher minimums within their jurisdictions.
?uuid=79a2ee92-c67a-11e8-bbfb-ac162d7bc1f7
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Inflation says $17, but we should be looking to improve on the past, not get back to it. It wasnt all that fair back then either.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)And how about, geographic adjustments to local conditions are appropriate as long as properly managed, and minimum wages should be indexed to changes in costs of living, like Social Security?
This is the information and IT age. It can be done and done well.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)sure you'll remember. We all pay in, the national kitty's not bottomless, and we should be thoughtful about how to get the most benefit for the most people.
Where I'm living right now, by choice, has very low land prices. The same MW paid to someone in a high-density area would be a happy boon to people here, leading to inflation in local real estate prices of course, and very likely also lead to shorting the urban someones.
I also just don't think it's right, and of course not equitable, to support people making MW in some areas at a lesser standard of living than we do others.
Nor do I think it's in our nation's interest to lure younger generations away from their families and social support structures with higher standards of living on the same MW elsewhere.
essaynnc
(799 posts)Corporations scaling a lot of jobs back to part time so they don't have to pay minimum....
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)In any case, check this out. We need a different approach, and this looked interesting to me.
Link to tweet
This feels like a good time to remind everyone that @RepTerriSewell introduced a minimum wage bill that ties the wage floor to the cost of living and purchasing power of each region. This bill has the support of many moderate swing-district Democrats.
https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/sewell-leads-democrats-introducing-regional-minimum-wage-legislation
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)me off and I correct and reiterate to fellow employees this is not a raise, from your boss, and raises should still be happening. People would walk up to bosses and thank them for the raise and I am all, hell no. Bosses would take the thank you and give a "your welcome". NO!
LisaM
(27,792 posts)We got here because it was stuck at the same rate for an unconscionable period of time. I don't mind that it was pulled out of an omnibus bill, as long as it's dealt with soon. But I think we need to do more than just raise it. We need to make sure it doesn't stagnate again.
Turbineguy
(37,285 posts)is with those who are above the minimum wage now and won't get an increase. Republicans like having somebody to look down on. Their mindset of freemarket value is that if you get $7.25 per hour, it's because that's all you are worth. And that's generous. The only reason you get $7.25 is because it's the law. If not for big government you'd only get $5. They on the other hand, get 20 bucks an hour so they are worth 3 times as much as human beings. A $15 wage means they will only be 1/3 as much better.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)increasing right a long and there should be a hiring increase on wage.