General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Red states get a lot of money': Fox News host destroys Marsha Blackburn's 'blue state bailout' lie
By David Edwards
Published March 07, 2021
?width=1200&height=675excuse
Fox News host Eric Shawn on Sunday challenged Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) after she claimed that the COVID-19 relief bill was delayed because Democrats "wanted people to suffer."
"The Democrats did not want timely relief prior to the election," Blackburn told Shawn in an interview on Fox News. "They wanted people to suffer and Nancy Pelosi told us why. She said because they felt like it would help them win the election."
Shawn interrupted: "Do you think it really is fair to say Democrats wanted people to suffer? I mean, they don't want people to suffer."
https://www.rawstory.com/fox-news-marsha-blackburn-relief/
Hey Blackburn, what you have done for Tennessee, you just voted to to try and fuck every Tennessean out of there own tax dollars, while you get paid over $174,000 a year to do exactly what go around and scream socialist, go on a show to defend your fascists' rhetoric and then try to and place what you and your fascists' party try to do on democrat's and call to blame us, not happening.
Your partner in crime was Ron Johnson right along with #Moscow Mitch who should also be expelled and removed from office, right along with you, in fact billboards should go up calling you out for what you did, you voted NO ............
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)doubleplusgood
(944 posts)stopdiggin
(11,253 posts)PatSeg
(47,285 posts)I guess republicans are so used to not being challenged on Fox, they think they can say stupid crap. I haven't heard one decent explanation for why they opposed the relief bill, but then they go back in time and try to blame Democrats.
kimbutgar
(21,060 posts)States can only get back what they put in. If Tennessee contributes 5 million they get 4 million. If a California puts in 100 million they get back 95 million. These welfare red states need to face consequences for these insane politicians they send to Washington DC.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)House Democrats passed a number of relief bills well prior to the election, and what happened to them?
REPUBLICAN Majority Leader McConnell fcking sat on them, and didn't even allow them to come to a vote.
It's so infuriating there's these media outlets that let RePuQ's go on for interviews and just LIE LIE LIE without fcking consequence.
Hell, they get away with it on ALL the networks, but not as frequently, and more importantly they're not purposefully set up to provide a platform for RePuQ's to go and LIE to the American People, day-in and day-out ... like Faux is.
turbinetree
(24,685 posts)we really need a new Fairness Doctrine, seriously............
Wounded Bear
(58,605 posts)stopdiggin
(11,253 posts)Midnight Writer
(21,719 posts)It's the kind of simple three word alliterative slogan that sticks in wingnut minds.
catbyte
(34,341 posts)Hekate
(90,565 posts)While red states that whine about where Uncle Sam sends money tend to get more than they ever give.
ProfessorGAC
(64,877 posts)Ranks all 50 states by federal dollar dependency, both by total to the residents & state government grants received.
Then, as you scroll down, you'll see other good comparisons.
As you'd expect California (you) & Illinois (me) are at the bottom of the list in receipts per fed tax $ paid in.
The methodology is near the end.
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-least-dependent-on-the-federal-government/2700
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,817 posts)benefits from the taxes paid in the blue parts.