General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDammit - Now they're after Pepe (rape culture!!)
Pepé Le Pew, a cartoon skunk who is part of the Looney Tunes stable of characters, has been reportedly pulled from Space Jam: A New Legacy, the upcoming animated live-action movie sequel starring NBA great LeBron James.
Both Deadline and The Hollywood Reporter confirmed the edit to remove the character, who for generations has made aggressive unwanted advances on Penelope Pussycat
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/space-jam-2-pepe-le-pew_n_6045d1dac5b69078ac6c786f
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,308 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,844 posts)Noodleboy13
(422 posts)I remember disliking Pepe cartoons when i was a child. It was obvious to me even then the poor cat just wanted to get away and that Pepe was being annoying and unwanted. This is also when I learned that unwanted attention is bad, so he sort of provided an object lesson in how NOT to act.
But it's also how I learned French, so it's kinda a tossup.
peace,
Noodleboy
Fullduplexxx
(7,844 posts)Nexus2
(1,261 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,844 posts).
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Just because people may have found it funny when they were kids doesn't mean it's not weird as fuck to show to children. There's only one gag: the cat gets a white stripe from paint, le Pew thinks she's a female skunk and stalks her through the episode as she tries to escape from him. It's supposed to be funny because he's French and speaks in faux romantic tones and raises his eyebrows like some kinda Lothario. That's it. That's the whole joke. Seriously, we can't just shelve this shit as stupid and inappropriate?
Walleye
(30,978 posts)And Im not easily offended.I dont mind the song Baby its Cold Outside. Especially the Ray Charles version
Hugin
(33,047 posts)Which has turned him to extremes in the pursuit of a rare opportunity after being rejected his entire life by everyone with a nose. Chasing someone he mistakes as one of his kind.
I agree, a little deep for children. But, like most "children's" media, it didn't start out that way. Being shown in theaters as a prelude to more adult movies with mature themes.
Maybe if he were rebranded as a porcupine romancing a pincushion.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)Hugin
(33,047 posts)Okay. Accurate.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Correct me if Im wrong, but I always thought incels were men who hated women due to their own bitter resentment of being unsuccessful in getting one to date them.
I dont get that vibe from Pepe at all.
Hugin
(33,047 posts)As, involuntarily celibate. The modern Incel is somewhat similar to what you describe. They have painted themselves as victims of liberated women, because, liberated women refuse to subjugate themselves to them on their straight out of the Old Testament terms.
Pepe has a few differences...
His goal is romance, love, and ultimately marriage. He's willing to do anything his target requires to gain her love. Love being the objective and not sex. To do this, he is in fact subjugating himself to her will. So, the opposite of the incel, but, due to his inexperience it comes across that way.
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)Refusing to take no for an answer gracefully is the exact opposite of subjugating himself to her will.
There's nothing romantic about forced unwanted attention.
Hugin
(33,047 posts)
"She often finds herself being chased by the overly enthusiastic Pepé, but when the occasion has presented itself, Penelope has been portrayed as the pursuer. For Scent-imental Reasons, Little Beau Pepé, and Really Scent have all shown Penelope to harbor an attraction to Pepé whenever his scent is neutralized."
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penelope_Pussycat
Which is more than half of the original Pepe Le Pew cartoons. Because, it's thought to be much funnier that way due to the irony.
I'm sure it's been more than 40 years since I've seen any of these cartoons in their original uncut form. So, I couldn't really say.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)She gets that first whiff of him.
i have more to worry about than cartoons that were never intended for children in the first place.
Hugin
(33,047 posts)I'm no believer in the effectiveness of cloistered virtue at changing society or making things such as abortion or being sexually homogenous illegal will make them disappear.
The greater issue is that the US's puritanical roots have led it to being punitive by default. It's not enough to have those who are different stop being different (which will never happen), they must be punished for being different in the first place.
It's the "Scarlet Letter" over and over again.
Yeah, Internet People problems seems to be with us for awhile. Like you, I have much bigger and more real fish to fry.
Walleye
(30,978 posts)demmiblue
(36,823 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,021 posts)bottomofthehill
(8,318 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,021 posts)Doesnt anyone see Pepe is an exaggerated caricature of Charles Boyer? Warner Brothers was having fun.
gay texan
(2,435 posts)The reactions to his smell from other people and animals is what I loved the most. I got in trouble for reading aloud in his voice in my 3rd grade reading class.
Deminpenn
(15,265 posts)even to know who Charles Boyer is so to get the joke these days.
Fullduplexxx
(7,844 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)They were a feature shown before movies for adults.
I enjoyed them much more than the dreck that was pawned off for children.
Except for Pink Panther and the like. That was petty funny.
I did not not get most of the Bullwinkle low and inside jokes until I was much older. That stuff is brilliant.
Fullduplexxx
(7,844 posts)AZSkiffyGeek
(10,972 posts)Pepe is getting Frankened! It's obvious that Trump is trying to get him removed!
Fullduplexxx
(7,844 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)I think this whole thing we do where we pretend offensive things dont exist is just stupid. You dont have to get rid of him, just update him.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)first people... then statues...ok...now cartoons.
Can Bugs Bunny be next ?
Elessar Zappa
(13,909 posts)The confederates were traitors and deserve no monuments or recognition.
sarisataka
(18,483 posts)such as the WW2 era propaganda ones.
Let's just say if they want to keeps Bugs as the star of the movie, they better not delve too deep into his past...
RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)and trump lost
4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)It is supposed to be over the top. His behavior is supposed to be absurd.
It is poking fun at his totally narcissistic personality, that it makes him completely tone deaf and lacking any sense of awareness.
He is so caught up in himself that he is totally unaware of the world and it's opinion of him. AKA an IDIOT.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)Boys will be boys!!!!
4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)I never condoned, pardoned, nor explained away his behavior. In either written or spoken word.
lame54
(35,262 posts)Iggo
(47,534 posts)Its only back in the news because space jam didnt get the memo.
Non issue.
Non story.
Sympthsical
(9,038 posts)obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)He is beyond "rapey."
Why are YOU defending his actions???
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)His actions are whatever the people writing for him want them to be.
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)He is part of an entertainment product that people watch, and leave very negative things from.
Saying he isn't real is odd, since he obviously is. He just isn't sentient.
Were the horrible anti-Semitic cartoons and comices Nazis wrote for kids real? Of course they were. Oh, who cares about "The Eternal Jew"! HE WASN'T EVEN REAL.
ahoysrcsm
(787 posts)Why do all these Looney Toons characters go around without pants?
sarisataka
(18,483 posts)Its noted that Santo, who has dealt with sexual harassment, was upset by the decision to cut the scene. The actress and singer, who runs a non-profit with the goal of helping victims of domestic violence, points out that Pepe is punished in the scene and that it would have sent a message to younger viewers that Pepes behavior was unacceptable. Its also mentioned that the decision to remove Pepes cameo is unrelated to a recent column in The New York Times by Charles M. Blow which argued, in part, that Pepe Le Pew contributed to the normalization of rape and predatory actions through his lighthearted portrayal.
Harassment leads to consequences (and possibly an opportunity to learn what proper conduct should be) vs put it out of sight and everyone just pretend it never happened?
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)Cant people let friggin cartoon go ?
Dr. Strange
(25,916 posts)White wokescolds tried to hide him, but Latin America still thinks he's awesome.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_Gonzales#Concern_about_stereotypes
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)Do you think the racist crows should still be in these cartoons? They aren't real! It's PC Bullshit to think teaching rapey stalkerish behavior and racism is okay, as long as it's in cartoons!!!!!!!!!!
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)Nobody's hiding them. They just don't have to make more objectionable content.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)I havent thought about Pepe Le Pew since I was a kid watching cartoons after school... decades ago in the past century, lol.
In hindsight, his behavior was awful and predatory.
I always hated Pepe, even as a child.
RobinA
(9,886 posts)as creepy once I was an adult. Seven old men keeping a beautiful young dead girl in a glass casket in the forest.
Luciferous
(6,078 posts)Mossfern
(2,449 posts)from all culture. You never know who's going to be inappropriate next. For goodness sake, it's a cartoon and I don't think that any child or even adult emulated Pepe or found him to be a role model. I know I'll get a bunch of flak for saying this, but I feel that things have gone way too far and the pendulum is bound to swing back in a big way.
Do we think that people will think that all skunks are overly amorous?
Are we taking the #Me too movement to old cartoons?
Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)If someone is looking for perfection, then good luck.
Everything to someone becomes inappropriate .
BumRushDaShow
(128,456 posts)this actually comes to mind (and in the Addams Family, it was a feature and not a bug) -
The stuff was in the "popular culture" and much of it was OTT and done "for laughs" because it was so ridiculous, but then they were a "married couple" ).
(and I will now try to exit out of this debate gracefully )
Mossfern
(2,449 posts)kinda.
BumRushDaShow
(128,456 posts)is that Morticia and Gomez were a couple, although there were episodes where she wasn't having it. But with Pepe, the shtick was his chasing after black cats who he mistook for female skunks, and amazingly the storylines would usually have something happen that made the female appear to be one of his species via an "accident", where a stripe of white (paint or other material) might land on her tail, and away he went with his fantasy...
As a cultural thing, the theme was the "male chasing after the female" for some dalliance.
In the animal kingdom, the males were given the bright colors or fancy plumage or horns or other physical traits that were used to "woo" the female. That cartoon seemed to belie that by mainly showing the aggressiveness and skipping over the "wooing" part.
BannonsLiver
(16,294 posts)Peter Pan and Dumbo have been removed from kids content on Disney+.
Thatll fix it.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Why so much violence, gun action, murder, and mayhem makes up a great part of our current visual culture, without people expressing the least reservation.
Why is that, do you think? Id rather cancel Quentin Tarantino and his adolescent machismo than a cartoon character from the past. Thats just me.
Trailrider1951
(3,413 posts)All full of fake lovey-dovey because he wants something, but when the mask drops you get a whiff of what a skunk he truly is.
Come to think of it, I've met a lot of guys like that, but once burned, twice shy.
ismnotwasm
(41,965 posts)Thats when a 700-year-old demon with the body of a young girl who, somehow, finds herself in a sexually compromising position. Yep.
Historically, the trope has referred to otherworldly spirits like Koenma from Yu Yu Hakusho who, although hes 700, looks like a toddler (complete with a pacifier). Theres also classics like the badass fighter Lady Kayura, whose hundreds-year-old lifespan isnt apparent with her 12-year-old looks. Its not always sexual. And its not always young girls. But lately, theres been a lot of that, and oh man is it gross.
Now, there are, for example, childlike goddesses who are literally referred to as loli big boobsI see you, Is It Wrong To Pick Up Girls In A Dungeon?. I see what you did there. It still doesnt fly. Nope.
Can we stop pretending that cultural trends have no affect on opinion or behavior? Pepe is pretty cute, endearing even but he also normalizes bullshit behavior.
I dont care if people watch it or even defend him. But lets not gaslight ourselves with its just a fictional character all medium reflects culture.
Polybius
(15,334 posts)We need to stop banning things that are offensive now that weren't in 1940.
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)He's intended to be seen as clueless but harmless, his antics dismissed and never taken seriously. Being raised with cultural norms such as this is precisely the reason we got someone like Trump as president.
Fix The Stupid
(947 posts)Notice the similarity between the cartoon (as in, fake, not real) Pepe and the very real Gov. Cuomo?
Yeah, thought you all missed that...
hy·poc·ri·sy | hi-ˈpä-krə-sē
1 : a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not : behavior that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel especially : the false assumption of an appearance of virtue or religion
Beringia
(4,316 posts)I never associated Pepe with a person, not by any stretch. Pepe seems to be really into being a French Romantic, not a chauvinist, in my opinion.
Striper and Pepe on the right
IcyPeas
(21,841 posts)it's a friggen cartoon. I loved Pepe when I was a kid. he's cute.
this is insane.
superpatriotman
(6,246 posts)That poor cat. Sylvester would never treat her that way. Neither would Tom.
demmiblue
(36,823 posts)Celerity
(43,107 posts)that exists within the philosophical ecosphere here, and is espoused by some who are in possession of a certain mindset. It is very easy to predict the reactions to a multiplicity of subjects that will spring forth from that zonal area of the continuum. You see it made manifest right here on this very thread.
radius777
(3,635 posts)so as to avoid the RW coming at us with the 'cancel culture' strawman.
Lots of cartoons and old shows have ugly elements that are out of place today. We can't just dump all of those characters. Updating what they represent, like I guess they did with Barbie (introduced more 'empowered' versions) could possibly work.
Seinfeld is one of the best shows, and when I look back at it and other shows from that time - it has several racist/sexist etc elements even as it tried to be ironic about it. The list goes on. In Living Color was also a great show from the 90s but there were numerous skits that could be viewed as sexist, racist, abelist, homophobic etc.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)That is a quote from one of the creators / writers / directors of the Warner cartoons made during the height of theatrical cartoons.
The works of the Golden Age of animation are no less works of art than any theatrical film. They were slapstick and meant to be. They had adult ideas that went straight over the heads of kids. It aint Windell Willkie was a favorite phrased used. What child would know the answer to that?(Google it )
As far as Pepe goes, he was a big coward. One time when the cat chased HIM, he ran away.
What is creepy as fuck is the crap people read into cartoons that are 70 years old. And fuck the PTA for getting the classics censored back in the 1960s.
betsuni
(25,380 posts)tinrobot
(10,885 posts)Personally, I think this took way too long. Glad it happened. That skunk is an abuser. His character needs to be retired.
For history's sake, I do hope they preserve the original cartoons, though.
Polybius
(15,334 posts)Vs. those who are Millennials, Gen X, and Baby Boomers.
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)There's really only one joke and it's not very funny.
betsuni
(25,380 posts)I can't tell!
GusBob
(7,286 posts)I dont think there are many DUERS that age This ain't snap chat
I'd bet very few. Id bet none on this thread.
Id further bet that folks that age have never seen that cartoon ever.
Celerity
(43,107 posts)I am what is known as a Zennial (also called Zillennial). We are a micro gen, born from 1992 to 1998 or so.
2 points
I am one of the youngest regular posters on DU atm from all that I have seen. There was a 'what is your age' poll a year ago and it was myself and 2 (at the time, now they are 20 I wage, and one self-erased their vote now) 19 yo's, both of whom never post, as the only people under 25yo, out of hundreds of responses. The age cohort dispersion DU makes it hard on me at times. It can get very draw-bridgey, and also far too reactionary for my taste, but is still is the best US political chatboard I have found. I do wish more people in my age cohort (18 to 30) would join. I have tried to get dozens of my friends (some American, some UK, some EU), fellow students, my own students, co-workers etc to join, but so far most all have had a negative reaction and quit (or never joined).
Second point,
of course we have, hello internet
cheers
speak easy
(9,179 posts)whether you can remember a world before the iPhone / Instagram / Selfies and Youtube.
Celerity
(43,107 posts)Android and desktop versions (which blew it up in popularity to systemic levels) launched in mid and late 2012, respectively.
speak easy
(9,179 posts)By 2010 - the iPhone 4, YouTube and selfie culture were all in place.
Celerity
(43,107 posts)by academic demographers.
speak easy
(9,179 posts)is having access to the internet everywhere . The smartphone changed everything. That's my bet on the cultural shift - if you can remember life before the iPhone, Youtube and selfies, you are a millennial. (or perhaps zennial)
Celerity
(43,107 posts)A 40 year old born in 1981 is most definitely not in the same gen as a 2002, 2003 born person (that last person fits your definition). You also are using a technological-dependent definition that cannot be universally applied.
speak easy
(9,179 posts)What is unique to that group. One answer - by the time you were a teen, you were taking selfies and posting them on the net - a transformative aggressive pecking order that has become more entrenched, year by year.
Look-At-Me ; Like Me
Celerity
(43,107 posts)If you are claiming it expends in the 2000's you are outside of mainstream demographical science
You also have now slid the goalposts of your own positing (and ironically your new test shortens the millennial gen and vastly expands the Gen Z cohort, so you are all over the place)
there were people born in 1989 to 1996 who were, at 13 years of age, doing just that
so now you are going to include all those as Gen Z?
I don't think we are on the same page here.
I am going with you definition of Gen Z as people born 1997 or later.
The first phones that had a front facing camera were the iPhone 4, and HTC Evo 4G in 2010.
What I am saying about Gen Z, is few can remember much of life before the smartphone.
I presume you accept that the smartphone has radically changed the way we live?
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)As an adult, I recognized he was a stalker and really rapey.
Everyone should loathe this kind of stuff, and trying to say only certain age groups do is gross.
betsuni
(25,380 posts)Have always put myself in the cat's place as a kid and GROSS.
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)Very upsetting.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Johnny2X2X
(18,969 posts)Just a total creepy character. Glad he's being removed from cartoons, really is a sick portrayal.