Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
H.R. 8 passed. (Original Post) SamKnause Mar 2021 OP
1 voted no on the stimulus package also... getagrip_already Mar 2021 #1
I didn't catch who it was. SamKnause Mar 2021 #2
I was wondering the same thing PatSeg Mar 2021 #6
Here they are aggiesal Mar 2021 #7
Better not be Kurt Schrader. calimary Mar 2021 #9
Here they are aggiesal Mar 2021 #10
sounds like a winner...... getagrip_already Mar 2021 #11
Now to the Senate. roamer65 Mar 2021 #3
Where it will be blocked by the filibuster. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2021 #4
What's that sound? AndyS Mar 2021 #5
Why should they get upset, given that it's almost certain not to pass the Senatef? Dial H For Hero Mar 2021 #8
Even just the suggestion that legislators might talk about restrictions is enough to create a tizzy. BobTheSubgenius Mar 2021 #14
Amongst those who are both passionate about firearms rights and ignorant of realistic politics, Dial H For Hero Mar 2021 #15
Are there still exceptions for firearms purchased PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2021 #12
It's a good idea. Kid Berwyn Mar 2021 #13

calimary

(90,034 posts)
9. Better not be Kurt Schrader.
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 01:55 PM
Mar 2021

He’s already been a disappointment and already voted the wrong way (ie: WITH republi-CONS) against the COVID relief bill the first time the House voted.

At least he had a change of heart when the bill went back to the House for a final vote. We gave him shot for his earlier move. When we do our weekly “asks” for our next “Call to Action” email, I’m gonna suggest one thanking our Congressmembers for voting yes, but I plan to add one directed specifically at him with a qualified thank-you and a “glad you finally got it right, but what the heck took you so long?”

The perils of being “represented” by a DINO.

BobTheSubgenius

(12,217 posts)
14. Even just the suggestion that legislators might talk about restrictions is enough to create a tizzy.
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 03:00 PM
Mar 2021

Simply mentioning one of the more horrendous examples of gun violence, like Sandy Hook, for example, will strike up the Greek chorus of "You ain't takin' my gunz!!!" Their 2nd Amendment right to cosplay vastly outweighs the lives of small children. Is the right to survive a day at school enshrined in the Constititution?

"No, but my gunz is!"

 

Dial H For Hero

(2,971 posts)
15. Amongst those who are both passionate about firearms rights and ignorant of realistic politics,
Thu Mar 11, 2021, 03:40 PM
Mar 2021

I suppose so. As for your, um, creative example of dialogue from those who are pro-RKBA, while I won't deny for a moment that there are those for whom the issue trumps all others in an emotional, unreasoning manner, the fact remains that gun ownership is in fact a Constitutionally protected right.

Does it have limitations? Of course...only the most extreme think otherwise. I have run across the occasional internet poster who will argue, in all apparent sincerity, that the 2A protects private ownership of any all weapons, from a sharp rock at one end to nukes at the other. Such an extreme point of view isn't worth serious debate.

Of course, the same applies to the opposite end of the spectrum, those who say words to the effect of "I'm sick of guns, and the government needs to confiscate every single one of them in civilian hands. Anyone who resists should have the gun taken from their cold dead fingers." Just look at H.R. 127, introduced this session by Representative Sheila Jackson Lee. It would consfiscate, without compensation, hundreds of million of magazines from gun owners, and its various provisions would result if the ownership of a single .22 rilfe or single-shot shotgun costing the owner tens of thousnads of dollars over the course of their lifetime. It's patetnly absurd.

Mind you, I've seen this opinion (and slight variations of it) on this very site. Thankfully, the vast majority of posters here aren't so extreme;

Oh, the overwhelming sentiment here is for at least some increased level of gun control at the federal level, with which I respectfully disagree. And that being said, I could certainly live with universal background checks and red flag laws without much griping. I'm not about to support restrictions on "assault" weapons and "high" capacity magazines, though.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»H.R. 8 passed.