Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPentagon takes heat for extending Guard's time at Capitol
BY ELLEN MITCHELL - 03/13/21 06:04 AM EST
The Pentagon is facing heat after it extended the deployment of National Guardsmen at the U.S. Capitol for another two months.
Lawmakers have amplified their calls to prove the validity of the Guards mission which earlier this week was extended through most of May as the Defense Department has struggled to relay the reasoning for the deployments months-long continuation.
Likely to add to the scrutiny is the Pentagons new estimate that the National Guards deployment at the U.S. Capitol is expected to cost $521 million through May.
The Guards additional two months will cost $111 million while the initial three months of the mission, from January to March, will cost an estimated $410 million, the National Guard Bureau said in a statement to The Hill on Friday.
more
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/543013-pentagon-takes-heat-for-extending-guards-time-at-capitol
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 676 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon takes heat for extending Guard's time at Capitol (Original Post)
DonViejo
Mar 2021
OP
gab13by13
(21,323 posts)1. The cost is the same as,
4 Trump golf trips to Mar-el-Loco and his course.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)2. Take it out of repugs paychecks.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)3. snark on: Yeah, let's normalize the situation by pulling The Natonal Guard out of D.C.
and while we're at it remove all Covid Lockdown restrictions. What could go wrong?
snark off
Hugin
(33,135 posts)4. Which lawmakers are turining up the heat?
Pray tell?
Like I didn't know.
Nice feint there... Lawmakers is the new some people.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)5. Names, Sir! Can The Lady Give Names?
By now 'some lawmakers' is a category known to include active insurrectionists, who doubtless would find their avocation easier sans garrison....
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)6. They're reducing it a bit, the fence perimeter too
But its not yet safe to just leave things wide open, so take the heat.
tetedur
(820 posts)7. Operation Noble Eagle began after 9/11 and is ongoing as far as I can tell.
Continuous combat air patrols were maintained over Washington DC and NYC "until the Spring of 2002" one reference stated.
Initially, Noble Eagle CAPs were flown over cities such as New York and Washington, D.C., supported by E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft and tankers. These flights defended major urban areas against further 9/11-style aerial attacks and served as a visible symbol of government protection.
However, the CAPs proved to be unsustainable, in that they put a major strain on pilots, aircraft, maintainers, and the military budget. Cost estimates for the nonstop CAPs ran as high as $200 million a month, and the Pentagon began looking for more cost-effective ways to defend America.
https://www.airforcemag.com/article/0205eagle/
One reference dated 2007 said there had been 44,000 sorties and the cost had been $27 billion.
https://www.norad.mil/Newsroom/Article/578175/the-years-of-noble-eagle/
I never heard anyone complaining about the money back then. But back then Republicans may have had the notion that protecting the country was important. I'm pretty sure they want us to lower our guard because you know, it looks bad.