Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,726 posts)
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 05:29 PM Mar 2021

Some questions to consider about the ...Worst President of the U.S.A.

1. Could Herbert Hoover have prevented the stock market crash and the following depression?
....Who knew about the consequences of such a crash and banks closing and not having enough
money to cover deposits. Had anyone clearly predicted the crash and what followed?

2. Could James Buchanan prevented the South from succeeding?

3. After Lincoln died, could Johnson and Grant prevented the corruption that eventually
followed the end of the civil war?


4. Could F.D.R. prevented WWII and the attack on Pearl Harbor?
Did he have clear knowledge ahead of time of the upcoming attack on Pearl Harbor?


5. Did any other countries experience the overwhelming terror of the Virus passing around
and killing people? Was knowledge available on how to stop deaths that would come with
the virus?
Who called the virus..."..a hoax"? Had other countries dealt with the virus before
the U.S.A. did? Could people have been warned about the consequences of the virus spreading through
the entire country and hundreds of thousands killed? Who was responsible for a total nation wide warning?
Did that nation wide warning ever happen?. Who gave it and when?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hlthe2b

(113,433 posts)
2. Lumping Grant in with Johnson is sooooo wrong. His drinking aside, he was not at all one of our
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 05:48 PM
Mar 2021

worst Presidents. And to suggest FDR somehow did not do all possible to prevent WWII and Pearl Harbor is to not know anything about the history of that time and the forces FDR was up against. FDR almost always leads the lists of best Presidents, for good reason, including but hardly limited to his attempts to aid the Brits despite Hitler-appeasing factions in this country--so this is really wrong.


Please rethink this. To be honest, I am so upset at the suggestion that these two--among our best Presidents are lumped in a list with Buchanan, Johnson, Hoover, and by extension, Trump that I'm just going to step away. sigh...

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)
5. Including FDR with the others is laughable.
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 06:22 PM
Mar 2021

I hope that wasn't the OP's intention.

Grant, on the other hand, is often included in 10-worst lists, though scholars tend to place him from mid-pack to around high 30s.

"The bottom 10 often include James Buchanan, Warren G. Harding, Andrew Johnson, Franklin Pierce, Millard Fillmore, William Henry Harrison, John Tyler, Ulysses S. Grant, Zachary Taylor and George W. Bush."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States

hlthe2b

(113,433 posts)
6. The major historians have systematically reassessed Grant in recent decades. No, he is NOT
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 06:29 PM
Mar 2021

one of the worst. That was based on sheer ignorance during a time when there was the most active attempt to rewrite civil war history with the promulgation of "Lost Cause" propaganda.

If you believe otherwise, start here:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/rethinking-president-ulysses-grant-stature-rising/

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)
8. I didn't say I believed otherwise. I provided you with context.
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 06:40 PM
Mar 2021

In recent years, he's gone from roughly bottom 10 to, as I clearly noted, mid-pack -- in the low/high 20s. I don't recall seeing any poll indicating that he was one of the best, scholarly or otherwise.

The National Review is decidedly right-wing, by the way.

hlthe2b

(113,433 posts)
9. I know about TNR, but this was a good assessment without a paywall.
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 06:43 PM
Mar 2021

The point of the OP was to lump Grant in with the "worst Presidents," which he decidedly is NOT.

Here are three excellent recent books on Grant which make that absolutely clear:
Grant by Ron Chernow

Charles C. Calhoun’s The Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant

The Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant, edited by John F. Marszalek with David S. Nolen and Louie P. Gallo

dpibel

(3,844 posts)
10. William Henry Harrison?
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 08:21 PM
Mar 2021

Dude was president for 30 days. I mean, I suppose you could assess that as a failure in and of itself. But how he gets ranked at all for a one-month administration, during the whole of it he was in the process of dying, escapes me.

TwilightZone

(28,836 posts)
4. You can't possibly be lumping FDR in with the others.
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 06:18 PM
Mar 2021

The foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor is a conspiracy theory. There is little evidence supporting it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Harbor_advance-knowledge_conspiracy_theory

WarGamer

(18,386 posts)
7. Monday Morning QB'ing is silly
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 06:33 PM
Mar 2021

If I'd bought AMD stock for $2 a few years back... and Gamestop in February for $20...

I'd be RICH!!

George W. Bush will ALWAYS be the Worst POTUS ever. Started an illegal and immoral war based on lies and bigotry. Killed millions.

I don't judge world leaders based on COVID-19

There are too many other variables. Look at Europe, 850k++ deaths... I'm not ready to blame the leaders of most Western European countries.

Let's get real. Nations with similar economies, cultures, infrastructure and populations suffered similarly.

Nations with historically obedient and submissive cultures fared best during the pandemic.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some questions to conside...