General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocratic Leaders who've said they think Gov Cuomo is innocent of the accusations against him...
(a comprehensive list)
choie
(4,111 posts)N/t
hlthe2b
(102,227 posts)brooklynite
(94,503 posts)If you aren't aware, I'm not "loyal" to Democratic officials. I support them up to the point where they stop being beneficial in their office. At that point I'll encourage their replacement with a Democrat who will be.
Just_Vote_Dem
(2,804 posts)are conspiracy theorists?
treestar
(82,383 posts)One who is accused get a real investigation and no penalties until there is proof. There is no jury of Democratic leaders.
Response to treestar (Reply #2)
brooklynite This message was self-deleted by its author.
kcr
(15,315 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)And automatically Cuomo is guilty of this, too?
So, this conspiracy really goes deep. Were all the other officials called in on it, too?
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Doesn't prove that Cuomo is methodically shaking down other state Dems for support by threatening to withhold vaccines from their locales.
If a bunch of people make this same complaint, or a tape recording showing it's happening comes to light, that would change things.
Your post was like 'he's doing it'.
kcr
(15,315 posts)doesn't make what happened okay. The fact that Schwartz was going around calling others is pretty solid evidence.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Based on how the question was answered.
The man's normal job would likely normally entail calling around to counties and seeing how the vaccination's are coming along.
His also asking 'how do you feel about what's going on with the governor' as part of the same conversation does not mean that receiving vaccine supplies is contingent on the county Democrat's answer.
However I could see how perhaps one or two (out of many) could decide this was untoward, and decide to complain that they 'felt' like they needed to answer a certain way.
If there was a scheme I'd imagine it was more along the lines of 'polling' the feelings of lower-level Democrats under the guise of official business. Which is arguably slightly untoward but not nearly as bad as actually having a plan to screw the public out of vaccinations.
I think calling it 'solid evidence' of such a horrid scheme ... is a stretch.
kcr
(15,315 posts)No stretch, here.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)over the response by a Dem county executive on a phone call re: how they felt about that Governor ... without a lot more solid of evidence than 'they asked the question in the same conversation when vaccines were discussed'.
That's a pretty freaking serious accusation, bordering on attempted murder, basically.
But to each their own.
brush
(53,767 posts)resigning or not resigning? What is supposed to be the problem with the calls?
rgbecker
(4,826 posts)Would be sad if anyone were to declare someone innocent before proven...or something like that. How's it go?
Not sure if there will ever be an end to the harassment or accusations without some sort of investigations
that will shed light on what exactly is "permissible" behavior and what is simply unacceptable social interaction.
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)Until there is an investigation and charges filed that is all it is to me.
Everyone I ever worked for, at least had inappropriate behavior. Including myself.
Ever watch Morgan and Garcia on Criminal Minds? Geez us. That is so inappropriate. Yet, viewers love them for some reason.
Who gets to decide when anyone elses inappropriate actions rise to criminal?
I wont judge. Ill either agree with an investigation result or not.
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Post removed
lame54
(35,285 posts)demmiblue
(36,841 posts)dsc
(52,155 posts)that is why I want, wait for it, an investigation.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,130 posts)I am still mad at what happened to Al Franken
no_hypocrisy
(46,083 posts)theneworiginal
(302 posts)...until proven guilty. This is still the way it's done here in the US. That's not to say there isn't reason to doubt him, but he deserves his day in court, so to speak. If there is enough evidence established, there will be plenty of time to get him out. If the evidence of substantial wrongdoing is not there, then another injustice will have been committed if he is convicted and sentenced without due process.
I am ambivalent about the whole thing, but this is where I land.