Cheap Fun Department: Job Growth Under Trump and Biden

[catbyte]

March 20, 2021

Okay, I’ll admit that this is stupid, but you know damn well if the situation were reversed the Republicans would have this comparison all over the place. We don’t even have to speculate. When President Obama assumed office with an economy in free fall from the collapse of the housing bubble, the Republicans were quick to blame him for the job loss from the crash he had inherited.

So, in the spirit of reciprocity, here’s the picture.



As can be seen, after four years in the White House, Donald Trump had a net loss of 2,943,000 jobs. After one month, Joe Biden has a net gain of 379,000. Looks pretty damn MAGA to me.

https://cepr.net/cheap-fun-department-job-growth-under-trump-and-biden/

[abqtommy]

1. DING ding ding! We have a winner and former guy is the weiner!

[BobTheSubgenius]

2. Cheap fun, maybe, but you're right.

The RW noise machine would be all over this, were the tables turned. Figures don't lie, but liars can figure.

[peppertree]

3. "Job numbers like you've never seen, folks"

"That's a promise!"

[ailsagirl]

5. Well, he didn't say the number would soar, did he?

Deplorable schmuck 🤮🤮

[peppertree]

6. Soar - and any other term of hyperbole you can think of

There must be a college somewhere that teaches con men to talk like this.

[ailsagirl]

7. Yeah - trump university

But seriously, I think t. was born that way

[peppertree]

8. +1

A dimwit's idea of a smart man, as they say.

And the results speak for themselves.

[ailsagirl]

11. I nearly forgot that marvelous word, "dimwit"

It’s perfect! 😎

[catbyte]

9. Well, at least not since Herbert Hoover.

[peppertree]

10. Separated at birth?

[monkeyman1]

4. republican loser's club

republican's in congress have no job skill's. so they don't care about that. don the con is a prime example of that case.