Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Smearing of Kristen Clarke
We Must Support Kristen ClarkePosted on March 22, 2021 by rikyrah
Ms. Clarke is one of the good guys. She also is a fierce defender of Voting Rights. OF COURSE, the right hates her and is lying on her.
But, we have to dig in and get her into the DOJ. We need people in the DOJ like her.
https://3chicspolitico.com/2021/03/22/open-thread-we-must-support-kristen-clarke/
The Smearing of Kristen Clarke
By Irin Carmon
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/amp/2021/03/the-smear-campaign-against-bidens-civil-rights-nominee.html?__twitter_impression=true
snip
If all of this invective sounds familiar, it should. Its the exact playbook that was successfully deployed in 2014 to topple the nomination of another Black civil rights attorney, Debo Adegbile, to the same position down to the grieving widows appearance on Fox News. Unlike Clarke, Adegbile actually worked on the case, although a civil rights lawyer successfully representing someone in a constitutional case isnt supposed to disqualify you for running the justice departments civil rights division.
Its impossible to argue that Clarke, a lifelong civil rights attorney who started her career in the division and has held just about every related senior position but leading it, isnt qualified for the job. But the earlier bad faith attacks on Clarke have already traveled from cable to the U.S. Senate, which has yet to schedule a hearing for Clarke. During Attorney General Merrick Garlands hearing last month, Utah Senator Mike Lee asked the nominee, Would an individuals past statements as an adult, declaring that one racial group is superior to another, would statements like that be relevant to an evaluation of whether such a person should be put in charge of running the Department of Justices civil rights division? Lee wanted to know, part of a series of misleading rapid fire questions. What about anti-Semitic comments. Would those be relevant?
Garland, who is Jewish, shot down Lees charge. Ive read, in the last few days, these allegations about Kristen Clarke, who Ive also gotten to know. Who I also trust. Who I believe is a person of integrity, Garland responded. Pressed again, he added with some heat, Im a pretty good judge of what an anti-Semite is, and I do not believe that she is an anti-Semite. And I do not believe that she is discriminatory in any sense. (For the record, neither does the Anti-Defamation League.)
As I write this, the homepage of the opposition-research site Bidennoms.com, a link recently tweeted by Ted Cruz, spotlights two nominees with photos on their homepage: Clarke and Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, whos been nominated to run Medicare and Medicaid both Black women.
Its impossible not to notice that women of color seem to be drawing fire for the wrong reasons, says Justin Levitt, a Loyola Law School professor and former Civil Rights division official. National Womens Law Center president Fatima Goss Graves told me, These types of campaigns against women of color, and the language that is being used, to portray these nominees as radical are not being levied against men.
Its impossible to argue that Clarke, a lifelong civil rights attorney who started her career in the division and has held just about every related senior position but leading it, isnt qualified for the job. But the earlier bad faith attacks on Clarke have already traveled from cable to the U.S. Senate, which has yet to schedule a hearing for Clarke. During Attorney General Merrick Garlands hearing last month, Utah Senator Mike Lee asked the nominee, Would an individuals past statements as an adult, declaring that one racial group is superior to another, would statements like that be relevant to an evaluation of whether such a person should be put in charge of running the Department of Justices civil rights division? Lee wanted to know, part of a series of misleading rapid fire questions. What about anti-Semitic comments. Would those be relevant?
Garland, who is Jewish, shot down Lees charge. Ive read, in the last few days, these allegations about Kristen Clarke, who Ive also gotten to know. Who I also trust. Who I believe is a person of integrity, Garland responded. Pressed again, he added with some heat, Im a pretty good judge of what an anti-Semite is, and I do not believe that she is an anti-Semite. And I do not believe that she is discriminatory in any sense. (For the record, neither does the Anti-Defamation League.)
As I write this, the homepage of the opposition-research site Bidennoms.com, a link recently tweeted by Ted Cruz, spotlights two nominees with photos on their homepage: Clarke and Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, whos been nominated to run Medicare and Medicaid both Black women.
Its impossible not to notice that women of color seem to be drawing fire for the wrong reasons, says Justin Levitt, a Loyola Law School professor and former Civil Rights division official. National Womens Law Center president Fatima Goss Graves told me, These types of campaigns against women of color, and the language that is being used, to portray these nominees as radical are not being levied against men.
......................
No one is really surprised by this. Their target is women and especially, Democratic women of color. They fear us. They know we would shine and some how that would make them look weak and not all that necessary.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 674 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post