General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI Should Be Able To Legally Buy A Nuclear Bomb If Anyone Can Buy An AR-15
They are both made for the same reason.
Killing lots of people.
What's the difference?
A.M. Kittenplan
(22 posts)Nuclear fallout, massive blast radius.
Shaddox
(384 posts)I appreciate the sentiment but your position literally makes no sense.
ColinC
(8,291 posts)Why are you trying to violate my second amendment ight???
hack89
(39,171 posts)Even when the constitution was written, it was understood that the 2A applied only to small arms and ammunition carried by an individual soldier. The state still maintained an exclusive monopoly on cannons and other artillery.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Proportionality.
I'm not arguing against the goal. I'm saying the premise is flawed.
Shaddox
(384 posts)Is killing human beings.
ColinC
(8,291 posts)Uranium's purpose can vary. A nuclear bomb's purpose does not.
Amishman
(5,556 posts)Fun to use the originalists arguments against them.
Arms comes from the french word 'armes' meaning 'weapons of the warrior'. Weapons carried and used by a single person. A nuclear weapon, a tank, artillery, a big machine gun - all fail to meet this definition.
marie999
(3,334 posts)What about hand grenades and IEDs?
Lets not give those troglodytes any ideas.
gordianot
(15,237 posts)rickford66
(5,523 posts)Maybe it's possible to build one. If someone could legally figure out how to do it, on paper, that could be one way to get some arms regulations. Note: I stress legally.
Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)None of Mr. Hahn's overt activities were -illegal- per se, at least not explicitly, save for the duping of the lab techs he tricked into sending him fissible material. The only reason he was caught/stopped beforehand was completely unrelated to his nuclear experiments.
That's the hard part of the nuke. The rest is just engineering and assembly and there's tons of shit online for that.
ProfessorGAC
(65,008 posts)...the uranium/gun barrel design of a fission weapon was so sure to work that the Manhattan Project staff didn't bother with a test.
That really limits the amount of engineering involved!
hunter
(38,311 posts)I can use it to kill one person or dozens.
I can keep some in my bedstand, wear protective clothing while I sleep, and spray it in the face of any home invader.
I can kill wolves with it.
I can fight off Communist invaders.
I can threaten my daughter's no-good boyfriend.
I can kill myself.
Yes, nerve gas should be legal!
Now, let's all debate the merits of each sort of nerve gas, argue about the nomenclature and killing power, blah, blah, blah...
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Kaleva
(36,294 posts)retread
(3,762 posts)tactical nuclear weapons.
hack89
(39,171 posts)PJMcK
(22,034 posts)Still, I get you point.
Hotler
(11,420 posts)And they banned lawn darts. FREEDUM!
ancianita
(36,032 posts)The only real freedom is the freedom to be scared and stupid and buy your way out of both.