Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

OAITW r.2.0

(24,455 posts) Thu Mar 25, 2021, 09:49 PM Mar 2021

If you can't conduct a succesful insurection on the US Capital, I guess state voting suppression

is the fallback position in creating a 1 Party State.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you can't conduct a succesful insurection on the US Capital, I guess state voting suppression (Original Post) OAITW r.2.0 Mar 2021 OP

These will be challenged in court, some will hold others won't PortTack Mar 2021 #1

They already own the Supreme Court TheRealNorth Mar 2021 #3

Repugs have been doing it for years. elleng Mar 2021 #2

PortTack

(32,757 posts)

1. These will be challenged in court, some will hold others won't

Reply to OAITW r.2.0 (Original post)

Thu Mar 25, 2021, 09:52 PM

Mar 2021

Even if we are able to pass HR1, this nonsense needs to be challenged...it’s just their opening act and we have to step up!!

TheRealNorth

(9,478 posts)

3. They already own the Supreme Court

Reply to PortTack (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 25, 2021, 10:12 PM

Mar 2021

Good luck with that when they have already set the precedent that state's have the right to govern how they run their elections, and have already voted against other voting rights legislation.

elleng

(130,865 posts)

2. Repugs have been doing it for years.

Reply to OAITW r.2.0 (Original post)

Thu Mar 25, 2021, 09:54 PM

Mar 2021

Reply to this discussion