General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone have a good article explaining HR1 (the voting rights bill)?
I saw this one posted on FB but I have some issues with it. It also doesn't seem very comprehensive. I'm interested in pluses and minuses that could be used to sell it versus criticize it.
The only thing I found useful here was that it explained that The John Lewis Voting Rights Act is a different bill-- HR4, when I thought HR1 was The John Lewis Voting Rights Act.
https://elections-daily.com/2021/03/25/h-r-1-the-good-the-bad-and-the-wtf/
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)To expand Americans access to the ballot box, reduce the influence of big money in politics, strengthen ethics rules for public servants, and implement other anti-corruption measures for the purpose of fortifying our democracy, and for other purposes.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1/text
Vox has an explanatory article about it. https://www.vox.com/2021/3/3/22309123/house-democrats-pass-voting-rights-bill-hr1 Skip below the discussion about getting it passed to the summary of what's in it. It's huge, though, and any summaries will miss a lot of items.
LymphocyteLover
(9,562 posts)LymphocyteLover
(9,562 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)cooperation and eventual agreement. And the house bill, which this is, goes over to the senate to be reconciled with the version the senate has agreed on, etc. The sausage making process where we're supposed to end up with agreement that'll work for most even if some are disappointed by what they didn't get.
For us, the disappointment we'll accept in this case is mostly already built in -- by us. This bill is enormously ambitious and would have been even more so if we thought we could get a lot more passed at this time. But Schumer, Pelosi, Biden et al intend to make enormous historic change happen.
LymphocyteLover
(9,562 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Whatever it means.
