Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDerek Chauvin used force against arrestees 6 other times. The jury in the George Floyd case won't he
Derek Chauvin used force against arrestees 6 other times. The jury in the George Floyd case won't hear about them.
Seventeen complaints filed with Minneapolis police about Derek Chauvin. Six times in which prosecutors say Chauvin used force against arrestees. George Floyd's 2007 arrest for aggravated robbery.
The jury considering murder and manslaughter charges against Chauvin won't hear about any of them. And their verdict may be influenced as much by what they don't know as what they do.
Chauvin, a white former Minneapolis police officer, is accused of killing Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, by pressing his knee into Floyd's neck as he lay handcuffed on the ground.
In the run-up to the trial, both sides sought to introduce evidence about Chauvin and Floyd's past actions. Prosecutors wanted to introduce eight incidents for Chauvin. Hennepin County District Judge Peter Cahill allowed two of them.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/04/01/derek-chauvin-trial-past-violence-force-arrestee-george-floyd/7020506002/
Seventeen complaints filed with Minneapolis police about Derek Chauvin. Six times in which prosecutors say Chauvin used force against arrestees. George Floyd's 2007 arrest for aggravated robbery.
The jury considering murder and manslaughter charges against Chauvin won't hear about any of them. And their verdict may be influenced as much by what they don't know as what they do.
Chauvin, a white former Minneapolis police officer, is accused of killing Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, by pressing his knee into Floyd's neck as he lay handcuffed on the ground.
In the run-up to the trial, both sides sought to introduce evidence about Chauvin and Floyd's past actions. Prosecutors wanted to introduce eight incidents for Chauvin. Hennepin County District Judge Peter Cahill allowed two of them.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/04/01/derek-chauvin-trial-past-violence-force-arrestee-george-floyd/7020506002/
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Derek Chauvin used force against arrestees 6 other times. The jury in the George Floyd case won't he (Original Post)
demmiblue
Apr 2021
OP
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,822 posts)1. They will learn of this if this racist asshole testifies
Raine
(31,177 posts)2. Too risky for him to testify. I would love to see him ripped to shreds
on the stand by the prosecution but he wouldn't have the guts to get up there.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,822 posts)4. This racist coward will not dare testify
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)3. This makes no sense, the 6 other restraints are relevant
Ms. Toad
(38,634 posts)8. In general,
The rules of evidence prohibit "once a thief, always a thief" evidence.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)10. Got it
TomSlick
(13,013 posts)5. Instead of retyping, please see my earlier post in another thread.
Ms. Toad
(38,634 posts)7. Latest Breaking News and General Discussion are different forums.
It's pretty typical to post the same item in both forums.
TomSlick
(13,013 posts)9. I wasn't complaining. I just didn't want to repost my reply.
Ms. Toad
(38,634 posts)11. Gotcha! n/t
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)6. It's prejudicial
This isn't even a hard decision.
Deminpenn
(17,504 posts)12. Exactly
Each case is decided on its own merits. Served on a jury for a case that was declared a mistrial because one law enforcement officer inadvertently said during his testimony that the defendent had a previous arrest and we jurors heard it.