Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe financial burden on NCAA sports wears wingtips, not sneakers
Important read for those interested in truth and equity in NCAA basketball.
Never again let someone from the NCAA call womens basketball or any other sport a cost. Connecticuts Paige Bueckers is not a cost. She is the entire damn point. The real cost, the real burden in this iniquitous, contemptible system is the legion of skimmers and coasters led by the devious do-nothing NCAA president Mark Emmert and his board of governors cronies. There is the dead weight.
How many AT&T cellphone plans do the Connecticut women have to sell on ESPN to subsidize Emmerts steakhouse dinners? How many bottles of Coca-Cola must the Stanford women peddle for free before their game is treated equitably and promoted decently by the NCAA? The biggest drag on collegiate sports, the real liability, is not womens basketball. Its these murkily titled, excessively salaried suits, who try to paint womens teams as a revenue fail to cover their soft-padded seats.
At the top of NCAA headquarters sit 10 executives whose collective salaries amount to $8 million annually, topped by Emmerts $2.7 million in compensation. Thats the U-Conn. womens operating budget for an entire year.
Let me repeat that. The salaries of just 10 NCAA administrators could sustain the most successful program in womens basketball for a whole season.
. . .
New Washington Post reporting by Ben Strauss and Molly Hensley-Clancy suggests the NCAA has understated the value of the womens tournament by nearly $100 million. The women are blended into a $500 million ESPN package of 24 championships. The NCAA has said the womens event is worth just 15 percent of that deal, or about $75 million. But people in the industry, including some who worked on that pact, say the womens tourney in actuality is worth around a third of it or $167 million.
. . .
source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/04/02/ncaa-women-basketball-tournament-cost-burden/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 584 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The financial burden on NCAA sports wears wingtips, not sneakers (Original Post)
SharonClark
Apr 2021
OP
underpants
(182,791 posts)1. Thank you. The NCAA is completely running wild
Im glad the players had the Not NCAA Property protests during the tournament.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)2. Perk cost may be embarrassingly high
Ferrets are Cool
(21,106 posts)3. Does anyone know the status of this lawsuit?
A person should have the right to sell THEIR OWN NAME AND LIKENESS.
"Attorneys acting on behalf of two current college athletes on Monday filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and the Power Five conferences that could substantially increase the tension and financial stakes connected toathletes ability to make money off their name, image and likeness."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2020/06/15/ncaa-lawsuit-over-athletes-images-likeness-puts-big-money-stake/3189283001/