Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,063 posts)
Sat Apr 3, 2021, 01:11 PM Apr 2021

Why Mitch McConnell Didn't Kill the Filibuster



Tweet text:
Marc E. Elias
@marceelias
"The last time the filibuster presented a serious obstacle to the GOP agenda, Mitch McConnell killed the filibuster and got things done."

Why Mitch McConnell Didn’t Kill the Filibuster
Read the latest by David Litt here.
democracydocket.com
10:07 AM · Apr 3, 2021


https://www.democracydocket.com/2021/03/why-mitch-mcconnell-didnt-kill-the-filibuster/

Mitch McConnell has spent a lifetime manipulating Senate rules for partisan advantage. But now, with his favorite tool for obstruction under unprecedented attack, he would like you to know he’s a man of principle.

“My colleagues and I have refused to kill the Senate for instant gratification,” McConnell proclaimed, during a recent speech defending the legislative filibuster. “In 2017 and 2018 I was lobbied to do exactly what Democrats want to do now. A sitting president leaned on me to do it. I said no.”

McConnell playing the committed institutionalist is what scholars of political rhetoric refer to as “complete horseshit.” But when it comes to his facts, rather than his tone, he’s not wrong. The last time the GOP had full control of government, President Trump urged McConnell to end the filibuster and allow bills to pass with a simple majority vote. He refused.

But McConnell’s choice has nothing to do with principle. The reason he didn’t end the filibuster is that he could pass the bulk of his agenda without it.

There are currently three ways to bypass the 60-vote threshold for legislation in the Senate—and all three of them are far more useful to conservatives than to progressives. The first is to attach a legislative priority into a larger “must-pass bill,” such as a continuing resolution to keep the government running. This works reasonably well if you want to make small, unambitious tweaks to existing law without disrupting the status quo. It also allows Senators to deliver federal aid and funding to their home states—when Kentucky’s agriculture commissioner wanted to legalize hemp, for example, Mitch McConnell tucked a provision allowing research on the crop into the 2014 Farm Bill.

*snip*



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Mitch McConnell Didn't Kill the Filibuster (Original Post) Nevilledog Apr 2021 OP
Without the filibuster, GOP has nothing to hide behind, all bills would get a floor vote Fiendish Thingy Apr 2021 #1
He didn't kill the filibuster because USAFRetired_Liberal Apr 2021 #2
Didn't he kill it for SCOTUS justices? brush Apr 2021 #3

Fiendish Thingy

(15,568 posts)
1. Without the filibuster, GOP has nothing to hide behind, all bills would get a floor vote
Sat Apr 3, 2021, 01:18 PM
Apr 2021

And every Republican would be on the record supporting or opposing issues important to Americans, they would be held accountable for every vote cast, and there would lots of them.

USAFRetired_Liberal

(4,167 posts)
2. He didn't kill the filibuster because
Sat Apr 3, 2021, 01:21 PM
Apr 2021

All he cared about was judges during Trump’s Presidency and there was no filibuster to stop him....he could care less about legislation so killing the filibuster didn’t matter to him and was actually beneficial because now that he is in the minority he can use the “I didn’t kill the filibuster” excuse

Edit - but when he is in the majority and needs to kill it for legislation that he likes, then he will kill it

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Mitch McConnell Didn'...