Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 09:07 AM Apr 2021

FiveThirtyEight: Why The Republican Party Isn't Rebranding After 2020

APR. 6, 2021, AT 6:00 AM

By Perry Bacon Jr.



Typically, after losing a presidential election, a political party will undertake an intense intra-party debate over why it didn’t win and how the party needs to change to take back the White House. Democrats did so after losing in 1988, 2000, 2004 and 2016. In fact, even after winning in 2020 — taking control of the White House and U.S. Senate and maintaining control in the U.S. House — Democrats are having an intra-party debate, trying to figure out why they didn’t win more House seats and struggled with Latino voters. Republicans, too, have had such debates, after losses in 1996, 2008 and 2012.

But not this time.

Despite Republicans losing the White House and Senate in 2020, and thus being totally swept out of power in Washington,1 there’s been no official “autopsy” or widespread consideration of appointing new leaders or anything else. In the period after the 1988 presidential election, the Republican Party has lost the popular vote in all but one presidential race (2004). It has lost three of the last four presidential elections and allowed itself to be dominated by former President Donald Trump, who was twice impeached for breaking with democratic values. But it is moving forward like none of that really happened.

Some examples:

Republicans on Capitol Hill and at the state level are returning to their Obama-era strategy of opposing everything the incumbent Democratic president does;

Republicans at the state level are adopting laws that make it harder for left-leaning people to vote, just like they did before and during the Trump presidency;


more
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-the-republican-party-isnt-rebranding-after-2020/


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FiveThirtyEight: Why The Republican Party Isn't Rebranding After 2020 (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2021 OP
We here at DU don't need PhDs to figure this one out. NCDem47 Apr 2021 #1
Yep. Nailed it. FlyingPiggy Apr 2021 #3
Republicans are in an ideological straight jacket. OAITW r.2.0 Apr 2021 #2
Well, they did an autopsy after 2012, then doubled down on the shit it said they needed to fix... Wounded Bear Apr 2021 #4
And the same after 2008, but by then the wealthy corrupt men Hortensis Apr 2021 #5
This is exactly why they are full steam ahead on voter suppression and obstruction. Ford_Prefect Apr 2021 #7
They love being the "Stupid Party." Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2021 #6
Frankly, why would they? WarGamer Apr 2021 #8
It's all gone too far. byronius Apr 2021 #9

NCDem47

(2,248 posts)
1. We here at DU don't need PhDs to figure this one out.
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 09:56 AM
Apr 2021

Republicans know they’ve lost the numbers game in terms of demos. All they have left are suppression tactics and scare the hell out of folks with some conservative leanings. Keep their core base together and ride it out. And the core is ROTTEN.

OAITW r.2.0

(24,446 posts)
2. Republicans are in an ideological straight jacket.
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 10:21 AM
Apr 2021

No deviation in thinking is allowed. Anyone with an independent thought is expunged from the ranks. There is no one left to debate the results and offer alternatives to today's GOP. Rather than change to attract more diverse voters, they have opted to self-select their voters.

Wounded Bear

(58,634 posts)
4. Well, they did an autopsy after 2012, then doubled down on the shit it said they needed to fix...
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 10:30 AM
Apr 2021

so this isn't really surprising. The former guy was a symptom of the rot in the repub party much more than some "revolution."

The conservative movement desperately needs an enema.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. And the same after 2008, but by then the wealthy corrupt men
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 11:16 AM
Apr 2021

served by the GOP had already decided they weren't going to integrate or share.

Where I diverge is that they set out instead overthrow our representative government, and the rot is an inevitable factor in that. Their previously slow-rolling takeover is very real, even if they've had trouble controlling the mobs they spread their corruption and subversion to. They've been able to turn to their benefit their base's pathetic failed rebellions against them (Tea Party and then Trump), though, and have made scary-big advances.

Purging and legal caging required, for sure.

Ford_Prefect

(7,876 posts)
7. This is exactly why they are full steam ahead on voter suppression and obstruction.
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 08:24 PM
Apr 2021

The Money behind them has planned for this and built state party dominance to control redistricting. They think they are one election way from congressional control that will eventually strangle Federalism and Equal Justice. They aren't worried about losing a fair election. They've seen the future of the planet and it means they need to own as much of it as they can without interference from our, or indeed any government. However bad the future is they believe they will be insulated from it by their wealth.

This is what is pulling the strings on the GOP. These people with an insatiable lust for power. The Republican Party of old was made of people who had a sense of loyalty to the country at large even if their version of that country wasn't mine. What passes for the GOP now is group of slavering zombies in comparison.

WarGamer

(12,427 posts)
8. Frankly, why would they?
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 08:35 PM
Apr 2021

They set a record for votes in a Presidential election, 90% of them love Trump, he's not going away and he's the King-maker for coming elections.

Did anyone actually believe that Steve Schmidt, Bill Kristol and Paul Ryan would take the party back into Neo-Conland?

byronius

(7,392 posts)
9. It's all gone too far.
Tue Apr 6, 2021, 11:07 PM
Apr 2021

There was never really a path back after Bush. Right wing radio made sure of that. Their polling, I’m sure, showed they made the best gains when they stayed just below full Nazi.

Enter Trump.

I think there won’t be a path back for them for thirty years. I predict a split down the line. Maybe sooner than later.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FiveThirtyEight: Why The ...