General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis expert witness in the Chauvin trial, a pulmonologist,
is eating the defense's lunch.
gohuskies
(1,155 posts)Chauvin is guilty of 1st degree murder in my opinion.
Ocelot II
(115,656 posts)The three counts are second and third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.
gohuskies
(1,155 posts)This trial is gut wrenching with the facts coming out.
Ocelot II
(115,656 posts)and premeditation is often hard to prove. Instead they charged crimes they were confident they could prove (or at least one of them) rather than going to trial with a greater risk of acquittal. I think they have a very good chance of winning conviction on at least the third-degree murder charge, which requires only that they prove "depraved indifference."
Ms. Toad
(34,055 posts)He is testifying as to causation, not mens rea (mental state of mind - premeditation). What he is explaining about causation is not tied to Chauvin's mental state. The state contends it was not Chauvin's actions that caused Floyd's death. This expert's contribution is his physiological expertise about the cause, not his ability to dive into Chauvin's mind.
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,496 posts)"were you there"
"Did you perform"
"How can you tell from video"
Or no questions your honor.
Deuxcents
(16,154 posts)I learned a lot just by listening to him..very precise n easy to understand.
Jim__
(14,072 posts)Nelson may make a few points on cross. The prosecution will probably clear them up on re-direct.
I expect the defense to go over the videos with fine tooth comb to try to find any possible conflict between the doctor's testimony and the videos. I don't think they'll find anything that actually contradicts his testimony; but they'll probably find some points of contention.
All-in-all, a great witness for the prosecution.