General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInternet pet peeve #718: Express opinion, get reaction as if you insisted on enforcing said opinion
Many of you know what I'm taking about. Some of you are the people who do this annoying thing... and I wish you'd stop.
I might say I don't care much for country music. Expressing this opinion does not imply, or even mildly hint, that I want to ban country music stations, arrest people for singing about pickup trucks and girls in blue jeans, or in anyway interfere with anyone's ability to enjoy this form of entertainment.
I might say I think many people in sports are paid way too much for what they do. This does not mean I do not understand the market forces that lead to these exorbitant salaries, that people don't have a right to earn that much money if they find a way to do it, or that I intend to support or push for legislation that would change the situation.
I do not like monarchy. Wishing it would go away and forcing it to go away in countries that aren't even my own country are two entirely different things.
For those who can't help but react as if any opinion expressed in coming from a desire to insistently force a change in the world based on that opinion, is there any help I can provide to make that distinction clearer for you in the future?
Srkdqltr
(6,276 posts)Never
Silent3
(15,210 posts)Of course people can and should comment.
The annoyance is all about comments that totally misinterpret what's being said... uh, much as you just did here.
Where, oh where, in the content of my OP is the idea of other people being having to be silent if they disagree even slightly hinted at?
Do you understand how to disagree with an opinion without reacting as if the person expressing the opinion was attempting to enforce something?
Mister Ed
(5,930 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)I think it's a manipulative distortion meant to shut down discussion when people do what the OP is talking about.
paleotn
(17,912 posts)I grew up in Nashville, and such close proximity bred intense contempt. But, hey, that's just me. Listen to whatever you like.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,806 posts)Silent3
(15,210 posts)...about outlawing something doesn't go against the spirit of this thread.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,806 posts)In constant reruns, but be designated as a superfund site...
StatWoman
(518 posts)"I think Senator XXX is going to lose in State Y".
"Why are you against Senator XXX?!?"
Silent3
(15,210 posts)As soon as election time rolls around 60% of people on DU think if you say something at all negative about the chances of a candidate winning, you are contributing to that candidates loss by discouraging voters.
Another 60% think if you say something at all positive about the chances of a candidate winning, you are contributing to that candidates loss by making voters not bother to vote, because they'll believe the candidate doesn't need their vote anymore.
This adds up to more than 100% because some people think both things at the same time, resulting in significant overlap.
And, aside from the cognitive dissonance, there's an underlying assumption that the type of voter who reacts this way is also hanging out in Left Blogistan.
(However, to the second 60%, I think we all have post traumatic election disorder from 2016.)
Srkdqltr
(6,276 posts)Someone posted it on mine. I get blasted for making a comment back. Can't win.
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)fed moldy weavil-infested bread, forced to sleep on broken glass, and chased around the camp by rapid dobermans, just because I disagree with you?"