Stephanie Miller and Rachel Maddow.

[Kath2]

Incredibly more factual, sincere and truthful than Hannity and Carlson.

[left-of-center2012]

1. I used to like Stephanie Miller

But then her show got noisy and crazy and not worth listening to.

As for Rachel, her eye rolling, facial expressions, and shaking of the head during her commentary turns me off. They appear to be scripted.
Maybe she's considered 'news entertainment'?

[Raine]

2. Totally agree. nt

[Mister Ed]

3. And even with all that...

... they're more factual, truthful and sincere than Hannity and Carlson.

[GoCubsGo]

4. The same can be said of their various guests.

And, in Stephanie's case, their regulars, like Malcolm Nance, Charlie Pierce, Karl Frisch, etc. are far more informative than anyone that shows up on the Propaganda Channel.