Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Kath2

(3,074 posts) Thu Apr 15, 2021, 10:06 PM Apr 2021

Stephanie Miller and Rachel Maddow.

Incredibly more factual, sincere and truthful than Hannity and Carlson.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Stephanie Miller and Rachel Maddow. (Original Post) Kath2 Apr 2021 OP

I used to like Stephanie Miller left-of-center2012 Apr 2021 #1

Totally agree. nt Raine Apr 2021 #2

And even with all that... Mister Ed Apr 2021 #3

The same can be said of their various guests. GoCubsGo Apr 2021 #4

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)

1. I used to like Stephanie Miller

Reply to Kath2 (Original post)

Fri Apr 16, 2021, 01:24 AM

Apr 2021

But then her show got noisy and crazy and not worth listening to.

As for Rachel, her eye rolling, facial expressions, and shaking of the head during her commentary turns me off. They appear to be scripted.
Maybe she's considered 'news entertainment'?

Raine

(30,540 posts)

2. Totally agree. nt

Reply to left-of-center2012 (Reply #1)

Fri Apr 16, 2021, 04:36 AM

Apr 2021

Mister Ed

(5,933 posts)

3. And even with all that...

Reply to left-of-center2012 (Reply #1)

Fri Apr 16, 2021, 07:19 AM

Apr 2021

... they're more factual, truthful and sincere than Hannity and Carlson.

GoCubsGo

(32,083 posts)

4. The same can be said of their various guests.

Reply to Kath2 (Original post)

Fri Apr 16, 2021, 07:26 AM

Apr 2021

And, in Stephanie's case, their regulars, like Malcolm Nance, Charlie Pierce, Karl Frisch, etc. are far more informative than anyone that shows up on the Propaganda Channel.

Reply to this discussion