The Supreme Court hears a case next week that could make Citizens United even worse
The Court’s new majority could make it much easier for big spenders to influence American politics in secret.
By Ian Millhiser Apr 17, 2021, 8:30am EDT
https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/0UrHsIFypWpL0wEpZBxiLuREDfE=/0x0:2610x1740/920x613/filters:focal(1011x600:1427x1016):format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/69142112/1204097749.jpg.0.jpg
The Supreme Court will hear a major case on April 26 that could fundamentally alter the Court’s approach to laws requiring political organizations to disclose their donors — a change that could make it much easier for big spenders to hide the ways they seek to influence policy and elections.
That case is Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Rodriquez. But to fully understand it, it’s important to keep in mind the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC (2010).
Citizens United is best known for its anti-canonical holding that corporations may spend unlimited money to influence elections. While five of the justices who heard Citizens United voted to dismantle much of the nation’s campaign finance laws, eight justices also voted that the government has fairly broad authority to require advocacy groups to disclose major funders of their political activity.
https://www.vox.com/2021/4/17/22384256/supreme-court-citizens-united-disclosure-americans-for-prosperity-rodriquez-thomas-more
This federalist society court is why this country is turning into a banana republic, corruption buys corruption and that is a value this country cannot withstand, and as a voter I believe I have a right to know who is buying who and at what value since the Roberts court has basically attacked democracy and said money is speech, this is why elections should be publicly funded and why the courts need to be expanded...
= new reply since forum marked as read
