General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI woke up this morning in a low seething rage.
Was going to write about it but thought better and took my dog for a walk instead.
I'm back from the walk but the rage hasn't diminished so I'm writing.
By now I'm sure you've heard that the Indianapolis FedEx shooter had his shotgun taken from him at the request of his mother because she was concerned about his mental state. Yet he was able to LEAGALLY purchased TWO AR15 rifles and passed TWO background checks to do so.
Since then there have been 4 mass shootings killing 13 and injuring 45.
Four days, 5 mass shootings, 21 dead and 50 injured in mass shootings.
Every God Damn one of these committed by law abiding citizens who passed a background check and legally bought the weapon of mass destruction they used.
And ya' know what? Mass shootings are just tip of the ice-burg that is death and destruction wreaked upon us by the gun industry. In the city of Ft Worth last week a father was shot breaking up a fight between his two teen sons, two students were shot at UNT in N Texas, a three year old died in an 'accidental' shooting in a park, a police officer and woman were shot in a suburb, two men were found shot dead in a apartment, a woman died when her car hit the guard rail of I-20 after being shot by another driver and I haven't covered all the shootings in ONE CITY IN ONE WEEK.
The media focuses on the DEAD but what about that 50 wounded in the last four days? How about the one that got shot in the gut, lost most of their digestive tract and will live with a plastic bag carrying their shit for the rest of their life? How about the one who now lives in a wheel chair because their spine was shattered? What about the three wounded for every death??? What of them? Don't they count?
What is wrong with us?
ETA: This can be fixed. Expand background checks to include Permit To Purchase from the nearest law enforcement agency, include a review of social media in the background check, limit concealed carry to 'show need' and finally outlaw the ownership of all semi auto guns that take removeable magazines of any size.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Rage is a healthy response to all this. Some people, like me, just get so overwhelmed and despairing over the whole thing, we go numb. It's not good. That is what they want, for us to get numb to all of this carnage. We need to stay angry and to take action and change things.
There is no good reason for anyone to have an assault weapon. None.
packman
(16,296 posts)by owning them. Insurance companies would love this.
Tree Lady
(11,498 posts)People harmed would get medical paid immediately, you could still sue like a car accident but insurance would take care of immediate needs. I heard victims have to use their own insurance how insane. If your gun caused anyone harm no matter who used it, your insurance pays.
So you can bet insurance companies would start regulating what law makers are scared to do.
aggiesal
(8,923 posts)in this case, the more automatic the gun, the more rounds/sec it can release should
all be part of what the premiums should be.
Make it so expensive to insure an AR that people won't be able to afford it.
The whole costs too much argument is often enough of a motivator. Not always, of course, but Id bet itd save a few lives if implemented.
aggiesal
(8,923 posts)something about taking a gun safety course and a mental capacity certificate.
Don't make it illegal to purchase guns, just make it nearly impossible to jump
through the hoops to purchase gun.
calimary
(81,487 posts)voting for guns.
aggiesal
(8,923 posts)knowing that any of the documentation is forged, they should be liable as well.
This puts the liability on the actual gun industry as well.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,567 posts)I forget the numbers, but for every $1 the cost of a pack of cigarettes is raised, a predictable number of kids won't start smoking. If a pack costs a week's allowance, or even 2 weeks, who would start?
pandr32
(11,614 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,917 posts)One partial solution - NRA/gun orgs sell (mandatory) liability insurance
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100215279100
"Guns: There's a "Free Market" Solution Every Republican Should Love"
Insurance lets the market decide. Profit for the NRA
Solution - NRA/gun orgs sell (mandatory) liability insurance
Protects the gun owners,the public,and makes profit for NRA and gun orgs.
Surely we can trust the gun orgs to not take advantage of such power.
dianaredwing
(406 posts)when they don't pay their premiums. Make them display stickers or laminated badges on their car and persons so that if they are a licensed gun owner everyone knows and those of us who wish to can stay clear of them. Anyone caught for anything, including jaywalking or spitting on the street gets checked for gun ownership and if they have unlicensed, uninsured guns they get them taken away. They are all so afraid of losing their guns, we should just take them.
sarisataka
(18,774 posts)A symbol or device identifying them as members of a certain group doesn't bring up any images of a historical parallel. Nope, none at all.
Wednesdays
(17,409 posts)What part of "gun ownership" is in-born?
Do you have a problem with automobile plate tags?
sarisataka
(18,774 posts)Their parents religion, however as an adult they have a choice of which religion to follow- or none at all.
Do you see historical legal requirements to wear a symbol identifying a person's religion as being equivalent to the requirement to display a license plate to drive on public roads?
dianaredwing
(406 posts)of a dangerous item, like a car, a gun can be used to kill people and the rest of the public have a right to know that the person(s) operating these items has a legitimate license and can therefore be somewhat trusted to know the laws and operate it safely without endangering others.
Jedi Guy
(3,254 posts)And you'll be the first to volunteer for confiscation duty, yes?
wnylib
(21,611 posts)insurance for cars, which can also cause injury and death. Let gun owners pay premiums for the damage they might cause. There would be some degree of self-restraint built into the requirement of insurance to own a gun. Lose your insurance, and you lose your gun. Can't afford multiple policies? Then don't buy multiple guns. Insurance companies have a vested interest in vetting customers.
hack89
(39,171 posts)And do you think mass shooters care? Do you think people illegally carrying guns will care?
wnylib
(21,611 posts)are carried out by people who are illegally carrying guns? Wasn't this thread started with a complaint about a shooter who was allowed to legally purchase guns after previosly having them confiscated?
There is no single solution to gun violence. We need a combination of solutions. Gun insurance can be one of them.
hack89
(39,171 posts)That is basic to all insurance. They will cover acts of negligence but not deliberate criminal acts.
wnylib
(21,611 posts)accidents, which might cause injury or property damage but not necessarily death. Payment might be denied due to carelessness then. Or cancelled, which would mean loss of the gun. Would that risk deter carelessness? Or would attempts to enforce giving up an uninsured gun result in a defiant shoot out?
Guess you are right. It wouldn't work.
Got any ideas for curbing gun violence by people who have guns both legally and illegally?
hack89
(39,171 posts)People that shot others are violent people in general. Any violence towards anyone else should be dealt with severely regardless of weapon and they need to go to jail. If a weapon is used they need to be in jail for at least 10 years.
sarisataka
(18,774 posts)Losing their car if they let their insurance lapse?
Fun activity count the next 7 cars you drive by. Likely one of them isn't insured. Repeat throughout the day to see how many uninsured drivers you encounter on a daily basis.
wnylib
(21,611 posts)in NY, if your insurance is cancelled and you do not have proof of reinstating it with the same company or a new one, you have to turn in your plates to DMV.
sarisataka
(18,774 posts)And if you don't have insurance you a not supposed to drive. However insurance companies do not notify the DMV when an auto policy is canceled. If you have it on the day of registration, you are good to go.
NY may have a law that a canceled policy must be reported to the state, but I suspect it is mostly on the honor system. They won't send anyone out to collect the plates.
wnylib
(21,611 posts)to report lapsed policies. It is required by law to turn in your plates if you don't have insurance. And yes, they definitely do follow up if you do not turn them in by a deadline date. Follow up can be a citation for court appearance, along with court costs. Or a personal visit to remove the plates.
hack89
(39,171 posts)So the impact would be much less than you think. And btw - the NRA is the leading issuer of gun liability insurance so you would make them a fortune.
Bettie
(16,126 posts)I mean, 20 little kids were shot to death and the only thing that happened was the guns became easier to get.
It gets easier with every mass shooting. Soon, most states will allow any yahoo out on the street to legally have a gun without a permit.
I don't have an answer, but I share your frustration.
Kaleva
(36,351 posts)We as a nation are a long way off yet from following the examples of the Vietnam anit-war effort and the civil rights movement.
AndyS
(14,559 posts)Kaleva
(36,351 posts)People are satisficed with posting on social media which would be the equivalent of writing letters to the editors of newspapers back in the 60's.
AndyS
(14,559 posts)Kaleva
(36,351 posts)Probatim
(2,542 posts)Over 550,000 people are dead from COVID and 20%-30% of the population still won't get a vaccine.
I fear it's going to be a long, long time and piles and piles of bodies before we ever see change.
Kaleva
(36,351 posts)Deaths from mass shooters is going to have to hit our own families or the families of people we directly know.
calimary
(81,487 posts)The next victim - will it be someone YOU know/love/care about? Because there WILL be a next victim. Guaranteed.
wnylib
(21,611 posts)social hero figures. In other words, "important" people. People with money and clout.
SWBTATTReg
(22,166 posts)our guns if we have an argument or such, and start blazing away. That's the NRA's method of resolving arguments, buy a gun (or guns)!
The NRA, despicable with their pathetic and sickening argument on guns, gun laws, etc. Many cities have tried to pass ordinances on guns, w/ some republican state legislators pushing back on these urban cities' attempts to rein in guns, etc. calling them unlawful, etc.
And I bet that the NRA's solution to all of these shootings is simple...more guns! Ironically one of the victims did have a gun, didn't do him any good, he got shot and killed (I think) too.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)gun-humpery significantly, as would restricting public toting.
Expanding background checks to include more than "Well Joe hasn't been arrested yet, so let him buy whatever he wants," is another key.
And, we need to remove the prohibition on suing gun manufactures, stores, and other profiteers for their efforts to lobby and buy Congresspeople, encouraging people to buy more gunz, running ads like that below for the gun that killed kids at Sandy Hook, and worse.
?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale
And I see no reason not to profile rubes like this:
?resize=488%2C519
calimary
(81,487 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,857 posts)... would rather see the "little people" dead if they can't have total control over them.
We had a Civil War because of people who insisted on OWNING other people.
They oppose better healthcare for the masses, exacerbate a pandemic with misinformation, balk at stemming gun violence, oppose anti-pollution regulations, etc.
Edit: The Mr. Potter types, celebrated by Fox News:
OldBaldy1701E
(5,157 posts)world wide wally
(21,755 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,917 posts)ripcord
(5,537 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)orgasm or something.
world wide wally
(21,755 posts)AndyS
(14,559 posts)just sit there waiting for the double tap followed by the triple tap.
Any idea how fast a feral hog can run? Close to 30 miles per hour. First shot and and after that it's spray and pray hoping there isn't any other stock in that pasture.
This is nothing more than a sales promotional video for idiots who never hunted anything much less pigs.
hack89
(39,171 posts)That's what I use mine for
world wide wally
(21,755 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)DiamondShark
(787 posts)AR-15 is more for appearances I suspect. Mostly paired with a shotgun, I forget the preferred shotgun loadout. Generally bean bag and close range round though.
And don't forget the backup, depending on the officer it can be anything from a compact handgun to full size handgun.
Botany
(70,585 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Or only sometimes. People who don't learn from their mistakes do usually repeat them, especially if they never realized they were making mistakes.
live love laugh
(13,137 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,639 posts)Since it's clear that society as a whole has agreed that our country must simply be bristling with firearms, society should also be asked to pay for the costs.
To that end, all victims of random gun violence, who were not directly involved themselves, would receive a Golden medical card. It would cover all medical needs related to a shooting incident, ranging from PTSD treatment for bystanders or survivors, all the way up to total lifelong care for someone with a shattered spine. This would cover any relevant treatment from any licensed medical provider, and would ALL be completely paid for by the government.
This would demonstrate our commitment to being a gun based society, by collectively taking full responsibility for the consequences.
If taxpayers began to balk at the costs, then society might begin to think about reprioritizing some things.
TLDR; Let society directly experience and PAY for the consequences of our country's gun fetish.
AndyS
(14,559 posts)gun violence?
Yeah, that's what it cost us taxpayers in a year of covid recession.
Crunchy Frog
(26,639 posts)and responsibility. Make sure that people can see a direct connection between gun violence and their own tax burden.
This would also insure that the victims would be guaranteed all the care that they needed, and at no expense to themselves. No more Gofundmes. No more regular insurance picking up the tab and then increasing the prices for everyone else.
Nice and simple and handled by a single government agency, directly funded by taxpayers.
AndyS
(14,559 posts)but make it a user fee. Take that $280 B and spread it out over every firearm and bullet sold.
I can afford it 'cause I hit what I shoot at or I don't pull the trigger in the first place.
Crunchy Frog
(26,639 posts)and a backdoor form of the dreaded gun control.
Ultimately this situation is a collective one on the part of our society, so society needs to pay for the consequences.
This might ultimately lead to society reevaluating its priorities.
MomInTheCrowd
(269 posts)AndyS
(14,559 posts)gunshot wound.
Not many have the stomach for it.
Crunchy Frog
(26,639 posts)Make it a part of civics education, since this is a part of who we are as a country.
The price of freedom isn't always pretty.
Wednesdays
(17,409 posts)It would be the perfect excuse for anti-choice extremists to force children to view pics of abortions in schools.
NJCher
(35,732 posts)one is that so many feed off a diet of action/adventure movies plus other types such as war movies, and even westerns. I won't watch any movie with violence in it, and when you have that parameter, there are so many movies to reject.
These movies normalize violence and guns. Watching them, one would think any person ought to be running around with a sawed off shotgun.
This is not normal. It is not normal to watch stuff like this day in, day out.
Our violent approach in the media needs to be changed.
The other is mental health. Many of people involved in these shootings have psychological issues.
AndyS
(14,559 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,639 posts)The state gets to police everybody's mental health, and maybe mandate particular treatments, on the off chance that someone with an identifiable condition might attain a firearm and do harm with it?
This would be a MASSIVE infringement on people's actual freedom and rights to privacy, and likely would miss the people who were at greatest risk of committing gun violence.
NJCher
(35,732 posts)I don't know why you'd jump to that conclusion, but it is well known that relatives of shooters have reached out for help because they thought their family member was likely to commit such a crime. However, in most of these cases they were turned away or unable to find any help in the first place.
In the future, please confine your remarks to what the poster actually says and do not inject your own thoughts into what is said. This is what is known as "misreading."
Crunchy Frog
(26,639 posts)Yes I do agree that the authorities should take reports from family members more seriously, and actually acted on them by confiscating guns, and prohibiting the purchase of new ones.
I apologize for responding to your post with my own ruminations. I tend to get a little triggered by talk of "mental health" in relation to gun violence.
I apologize for misunderstanding your post.
NJCher
(35,732 posts)apology accepted.
EX500rider
(10,864 posts)Sort of Fahrenheit 451?
AndyS
(14,559 posts)EX500rider
(10,864 posts)Except the same kind of people that want to ban Rock lyrics and rap lyrics
AndyS
(14,559 posts)Wednesdays
(17,409 posts)Including the violent films.
Yet it is the USA with the gun problem. I wonder why that is.
Quakerfriend
(5,453 posts)- I regret that the MSM does not show the horrors of what it means to be shot and survive.
This article tells the truth about the damage these newer automatic weapons do:
https://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/gun-violence/.
ER doctors Ive know who have worked alongside Dr. Goldberg say she is the very best.
-I dont know if anyone saw this but, Jackie Speier- who was shot multiple times, asked Marjorie T Green if she knew what is was like to be shot.
You can read of her harrowing experience here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackie_Speier.
AndyS
(14,559 posts)what they will go through for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.
Runningdawg
(4,522 posts)There needs to be a video of EVERY sale. If some nut goes off, find out who sold him the weapon. I don't give AF if you can pass a background check if you tell the clerk you want a gun for shooting (insert racial slur here) or tell them proudly, it's for killing liberals, or committing some other crime, YOU SHOULD BE DENIED. I was 2 spaces behind a 20 something once, either off his meds or on the wrong ones, who stood in line talking to his imaginary friend and having a pretend shootout with him while waiting for his paperwork to be finished. The clerk didn't give a damn, he needed the commission. Application approved. Will that be cash or plastic?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)'brown' person is running across your lawn."
Have not been in a gun store in decades and don't plan too, but I know what you said is true about some of the customers.
MagickMuffin
(15,952 posts)It passed the house and is moving for a vote in the senate.
Texas bill to carry gun without permit advances to state senate
NO PERMITS, let that sink in!
AndyS
(14,559 posts)not that it will make a lot of difference here in TX.
MagickMuffin
(15,952 posts)But it is hard to imagine that this was even brought up to a vote. It is disgusting! As if we don't already have a gun problem, just as you stated in your excellent OP.
There will be just more shooting. Guns empower people, or so it seems.
LaMouffette
(2,039 posts)I live in Montana and our newly elected Republican governor Greg Gianforte (yes, the guy that body slammed a reporter for the Guardian) recently expanded our state's right-to-carry laws. Now, Montanans can carry concealed weapons pretty much everywhere, with these exceptions:
The measure allows concealed firearm possession without a permit by default in most places in the state, with exceptions including secure law enforcement facilities, federal buildings, courtrooms, and K-12 schools. Property owners and tenants would have the ability to expressly prohibit firearm possession in private homes and businesses.
[link:https://montanafreepress.org/2021/02/18/gianforte-signs-constitutional-carry-gun-bill/|
Nice how Gianforte and the Republican-held Montana legislature don't want people to conceal carry in the federal buildings where they themselves work, but it's fine for everyone else to be vulnerable to armed attack by some crazed, gun-toting nut job at their own workplace or other public location.
I simply don't understand how Republicans can be so unmoved by the spectacular increase in mass shootings. If anything, they see it as proof that people should buy more guns and have more freedom to take them anywhere they please and to buy whatever kind of gun they desire. I don't get it, I don't get it, I do . . . not . . . get it.
I had a few ideas, which have little hope in hell of being enacted, but here goes:
1. Give Americans one year in which to either register their guns or sell them to local law enforcement for a fair price. Then after one year, set up a hotline for reporting people who have guns that are not registered. Police go after those people and seize their guns. Pay tipsters $5,000 for each confiscated gun.
2. Make it so that no matter where you buy a gun, the person or store who sold the gun to you must deliver it to the local police station where you have to pick it up in person. When you pick it up, police will conduct the background check on the spot and do an interview with you. The police would have trained staff to evaluate the buyer's mental fitness and emotional state. This requirement would do two things: 1. If people knew they had to go to the cop shop to pick up their gun, they might not go buy one in the first place. 2. The police should be able to spot the most obviously unhinged people, judging by the looks of those arrested in recent mass shootings.
3. If we can't make assault rifles illegal, then we should adhere to the "well-regulated militia" part of the 2nd Amendment and make people who own an assault rifle join their state's National Guard. Require them to go through bootcamp and do the same number of hours of duty as other Guard members.
4. Also, if we can't make assault rifles illegal, then make it illegal to keep one's assault rifle at one's home. They would have to keep them in a local repository and check them out.
Like I said, these ideas would be met with rabid opposition from the gun-loving members of our country, but something, something must be done.
politruk
(88 posts)is more firepower than one would need for home defense, and it would be unsporting to use such a weapon for hunting. I can't see how a civilian has any legitimate use for such a weapon.
But banning them would make little difference -- most shooting deaths in the U.S. are inflicted by handguns. Good luck trying to ban those.
AndyS
(14,559 posts)just the ones most lethal, i.e. semi auto with interchangeable magazines. Rate of fire and speed of reload make for maximum lethality.
Six shooters are usually more accurate, less prone to secondary discharge and if you can't make a bad guy stop doing what he's doing with six tries what the hell are you doing with a gun anyway?
hack89
(39,171 posts)how generous of you.
LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)Thats his answer.
Make ammo so expensive that every single bullet costs 10 bucks or more.
Im at a loss so my solution is to never live in my home country again which I am unwilling to accept. I want to move home but I am terrified because I love a man of color.
Hes a naturalized citizen but Im scared to move back.
Thats the fact Jack.
Runningdawg
(4,522 posts)Restrict the sale of powder and primers like you do matches and Sudafed, that MIGHT make a dent.
LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)I have seen shot gun ammo being made but that was decades ago.
I didnt know you could make bullets for rifles at home.
hack89
(39,171 posts)the courts take a dim view of back door bans. There is plenty of case law on the subject.
IbogaProject
(2,841 posts)I propose a self funded National personal armament insurance pool, all these costs need to be born by all gun owners in proportion to amount and relative threat. Single shot rifles pay the least, hand guns more, assault rifles the most.
hadEnuf
(2,212 posts)He simply watches Fox Propaganda and listens to the current NRA backed asshole on the radio and forgets all about it. Except for the part about duh libs trying to take all his freedumbz, that is.
Fox, the NRA and the Republican party could care less about how high the bodies stack. It's what they like.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,636 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)augyboston
(193 posts)What about the right to life?!? The first right mentioned in the Declaration of Independence! What about that right???
How about the right not to live in fear that as we go about a daily business some disgruntled nut with a firearm will decide to deny us the right to life???
Every time we go to the supermarket or to a movie or to the park, we have to worry that we may be cut down by some screwball with a firearm!
This country has become a shooting gallery, where the citizens are the ducks - as in sitting ducks. It's senseless and disgusting.
How many more children do we have to lose at school to decide we've had enough???
As far as I'm concerned we can vaporize the second amendment and outlaw all guns and to those who worship their guns - they can shove the second amendment up their asses!