General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy didn't the cop in Ohio use a multi-shot taser on 15 yr old girl, Ma'khia Bryant?!
Why didn't the cop in Ohio use a multi-shot taser on the 15 yr old girl, Ma'khia Bryant?!
Are people really going to make the case the 15 yr old girl is going to muscle out of multiple taser shots ?!
That doesn't sound reasonable.
EDIT: If you're going to make the case that multiple shots from a taser wouldn't have worked on a 15yr old girl do you have evidence to back that up?
EDIT: If they don't have tasers, which doesn't sound plausible, then that's furthers my point of PDs using the most lethal of force especially when it comes to non-whites
EDIT: Here's a cop being stopped by a taser shot from his partner
Yes there were options instead of most lethal force, people saying their wasn't are ignorant or starting shit, and police in America statistically take the most lethal force when it comes to people who are not white.
The fact people are justifying the most lethal force vs an escalation is a reason why Floyd is a start and not the conclusion.
MLK said one of his biggest fights is getting the moderates off the fence and this is so true when it comes to policing in this day.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,309 posts)violence without a gun. If she had been tased and then sat on for 10 minutes and died, we'd be asking about other alternatives. The truth is, cops bring violence when they show up, and we have to come to terms whether we're okay with things getting out of hand once in awhile, or not.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(4,457 posts)This is the exact kind of scenario tasers were meant for. This is going to to be ruled a "clean shoot" and will ignore the fact that the police's response is almost always escalation maximum force.
TheBlackAdder
(28,169 posts).
It's almost like that time the cops drove up and shot that boy on a swing set within two seconds.
.
honest.abe
(8,618 posts)It was a quick violent difficult situation, but shooting the girl 4 times does not seem like the correct decision here.
TheBlackAdder
(28,169 posts).
Acquaintances who graduated NJSP's Sea Girt training facility are taught to shoot twice, reassess threat, shoot twice.
.
samsingh
(17,593 posts)if the girl was white, i believe she would be alive today
Miguelito Loveless
(4,457 posts)police tend to try and de-escalate situations when White people are involved.
TheBlackAdder
(28,169 posts)Bettie
(16,079 posts)but, try to convince some of the people around here of that.
There are plenty of ways to deescalate.
He could have still shot her, but with a taser...but nope, he decided to kill her.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)sarisataka
(18,501 posts)Are issued to Columbus PD?
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... shooting.
Where is their money going ?!
sarisataka
(18,501 posts)However if the officer was not properly equipped, he was forced to use what he had been given. He cannot be held responsible if that is the case.
haele
(12,640 posts)Saw the boxey shape and yellow on the handle.
But, they'll claim he was too far away, and the girl was making a stabbing motion towards the other girl. Have you seen a serious knife fight? I have, and there's a big difference between a defensive and offensive posture between the combatants, even with knives out and slashing or stabbing.
If the girl was closing or close enough to damage the other girl, four or five shots at center mass would have also potentially hit or grazed the potential victim.
I've seen knife fighters in a back ally disarmed while on Shore Patrol checking out one of the more notorious bars in Long Beach. Back in the day when most cops weren't all into the Thin Blue Lie and trained to be hair-trigger stone cold killers.
It can be done.
Haele
sarisataka
(18,501 posts)And have been in several- all but one being martial arts training. I also saw the video and believe the knife was being used offensively.
The girls were touching so there was a risk of hitting the other.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Are you referring to a different case?
TwilightZone
(25,432 posts)The OP is confusing two cases. Simon was killed two years ago in an accidental shooting in Texas.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)marie999
(3,334 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(4,457 posts)There were other options, he chose escalation and maximum force.
marie999
(3,334 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... multiple taser shots?
tia
marie999
(3,334 posts)could pull and shoot the laser before she is knifed?
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts).... Dangerous than tasers
kcr
(15,315 posts)that they've universally replaced guns with tasers in nearly all instances including in defense of lethal force, including their own self-defense while their guns collect dust? Or do they tell you that they pretty much use them mostly to get compliance in non-lethal situations?
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... people on this thread are arguing the opposite
kcr
(15,315 posts)If they were equally as effective and efficient at stopping people, they would effectively replace guns. That was the argument for their inclusion into police forces. But it hasn't turned out that way, has it?
Well, I decided to do a little quick research:
https://www.apmreports.org/episode/2019/05/09/when-tasers-fail
https://www.npr.org/2019/06/27/729922975/despite-widespread-use-police-rate-tasers-as-less-effective-than-believed
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/taser-vs-gun-why-police-choose-deadly-force-despite-non-n656461
But I already basically knew this, as this is an area of interest.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)You want everyone to take the word of your cop friends over legit sources. But I'm the one starting shit.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... NOT ... be flexed by a taser is ignorant.
I doesn't even make sense on its face
kcr
(15,315 posts)is ignorant.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... if you have to remove the "15 yr old girl" part from my position then you're losing the argument.
kcr
(15,315 posts)Pointing out that sources like John Jay College, of all places (seriously, look them up if you don't know) doesn't make exceptions for 15-year-olds in their assessment of tasers is in no way the same thing as the pathetic defense of Chauvin. If you have to twist other people's arguments and compare them to others that are in no way the same, maybe you're losing the argument. Also using cop buddies as sources.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)But if he'd tased her and missed, or tased her and it didn't stop her, since it turns out tasers aren't as reliable, and the other girl ended up dead, then that would have been bad. I don't even like guns, and I know which option I'd chose if both were available and I or someone I loved was getting stabbed. I'd pick the gun in a heartbeat.
I'm not trying to hold up this cop as an example of a good one, or a distraction against how bad cops are. But the whole stopped clock thing, you know? I'm just perplexed at the disregard for the poor girl who was almost stabbed.
Your use of flex. Did your cop friends teach you that?
Miguelito Loveless
(4,457 posts)"Yes, they could have drawn the taser and shot her with it."
Miguelito Loveless
(4,457 posts)and mentally ill people with knives. My main weapon was words, as I did not have a gun. I am still alive, and so are the people I talked down. If you have a hammer, all problems are nails.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)You sound like just the needed hammer for our communitys nails.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,457 posts)The UK police force deals with knife wielders sans guns all the time, so it can be done. Apparently since roided-up, murderously trained US cops can't, we should just accept that as reality.
Also, the police officer fired FOUR times, which is panic fire. He fired with the victim he was "protecting" in the line of fire. He could have just as easily shot the victim, and other bystanders.
Happy Hoosier
(7,221 posts)The use of deadly force is the ONLY reasonable response. It is clear to me that his primary duty there was to protect the victim. Less lethal means are to generally be preferred, but not when someone else's life is on the line. Do you wanna be the one to explain to the victims mother that you didn't do all you could to save her because you were concerned about the attacker's well being?
PSPS
(13,580 posts)wnylib
(21,347 posts)testosterone, or both.
PSPS
(13,580 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)rockfordfile
(8,699 posts)SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)He was pissed off at the Chauvin verdict and emptied his clip at the first target he had.
I could be wrong.
But I doubt it.
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)that's exactly what I said. It happened at around the exact same time the verdict was read.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)TheProle
(2,159 posts)doc03
(35,300 posts)4 rounds. So he didn't empty his clip. If the victim of the stabbing had been killed the COP would have been blamed for that too. I think if someone is in the process of killing another person it has to be stopped. If a civilian was there with a gun he would have been justified in the shooting.
sarisataka
(18,501 posts)Because this happened before the verdict was read.
SYFROYH
(34,163 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 21, 2021, 01:53 PM - Edit history (1)
There was no one throwing fists or swinging knives when he arrived.
But then something erupted between Ma'khia and a girl in shorts where Ma'khia swung the knife at her and probably would have hit her if she didn't tumble backward. That's when the gun was drawn.
As the gun was being drawn, Ma'khia went for the girl in pink and was winding up her arm with a knife in hand. The girl in pink was pressed up against the car and could not move away easily.
I think the cop rolled in soft.
AZSkiffyGeek
(10,975 posts)She was holding a dog and was not involved in the scuffle at all (at that point). To my eye it looks pretty calm when the cop arrives.
kcr
(15,315 posts)He didn't even start shooting when the girl went after the first victim. It was when she started trying to stab the second girl with the dog. It all happened fast, which is why the shooting happened fairly quickly after he arrived. But it happened because that's when the girl started trying to stab the girl with the dog.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)But let's hear again about how we shouldn't be suspicious about this shooting.
wnylib
(21,347 posts)the verdict was read. Eastern time in Ohio, between 4:30 pm and 5:00 pm, the verdict was not yet known in Ohio.
I strongly suspect that those cops sympathized with Chauvin, especially since at least one of them said, "Blue lives matter" after the shooting.
But the verdict was not yet public when cops responded to this call.
rgbecker
(4,820 posts)Very few lethal uses of batons even though they have been used excessively during various demonstrations across the country. Pushing people to the ground has also been very effective during these protests. There is always the "three cops on a black man technique" which has been shown to be very effective, even overly effective in some instances when used with the "knee on neck" technique.
Have to ask: If Makaila was indeed in the act of stabbing the other girls, why have those girls not shown up for medical services at the local ER? Maybe I've missed that report?
I'm a converted moderate and I'm sick of it.
Celerity
(43,162 posts)pretty much looks to be the case to me
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)case.
Personally, I'd go for something like this. When police pull up and there is chaos, cut loose with one of these Sound Cannons. Of course, people complain about them too.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... I even put it in my OP that doesn't half way sound reasonable.
damn yaw
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EzeCymEWEAEWqL6?format=jpg&name=medium
?w=1040&quality=70&strip=all
I guess police should have just stood there and watched the two Black ladies fight, one armed with a knife.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... muscling out of a freakin taser man... damn
here's a cop being hit by a taser
I guess police should have just stood there and watched the two Black ladies fight, one armed with a knife.👈🏾 What's up with this petulant assed comment?!
They can do the right thing and not have to use the most lethal force mostly on non whites, ... you know one of the reasons why their needs to be police reform?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... likely not be able to muscle out of multiple taser shots and it would've been less dangerous for the people around the shot.
No
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts)DetroitLegalBeagle
(1,915 posts)But that's the problem, they don't always work properly. Taser's have a very specific range in which they are most effective. Too close, and the barbs don't spread wide enough for the electrical shock to be effective. Too far and the barbs miss. Clothing and movement can prevent one or both barbs from getting good contact with the person they are being used on. Their reliability issues are widely known to the point that the company that makes them was facing criticism for falsely advertising their reliability rate. Knowing those reliability issues, when someone is about to be stabbed, do you chance it or no?
Also, multi shot tasers aren't exactly widespread. At most they have 2 shots. The most widely issued ones have only a single shot.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... girl would not be able to muscle out of multiple taser shots.
I fuckin don't believe we're talking about this here
TwilightZone
(25,432 posts)You could at least get the shooting victim's name correct.
honest.abe
(8,618 posts)Clearly it was a difficult situation but there has to be alternatives to blasting away in situations like this.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)Thats just the reality of all this. He could have used several things to calm the situation. Hes a grown up. How about just trying to talking to the young lady. Let her know, hes there to help and to calm her down.
The reality is if she was white, use of his gun would have been the last resort. They get the benefit of doubt. Black folks dont.
TheProle
(2,159 posts)Thrill
(19,178 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... could've stopped a 15 yr old girl and been less dangerous for the people around here.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Thrill
(19,178 posts)Shot a white girl. Thats the bottom line.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Police shoot white people, not proportionately to population, but they shoot more white people than minorities.
The girl with the knife a fraction of a second from the other Black girl, had to be dealt with.
Personally, I think it is time to hire more Black officers and, whenever possible, send them to such scenes. I don't like the sound of that, but it would remove the element of a white policeman.
BTW -- they just had a neighbor of the girl shot on CNN. Just caught a glimpse but it sounded like he said the policeman had to react and then went on to say that whether police could have used something else is debatable.
Here's a written report of the neighbor -- A neighbor of MaKhia Bryant told New Day that video of MaKhias death demonstrated that the teen was the aggressor. I can certainly see why the police officer chose to stop her. Now, whether or not less lethal force could have been used, whether or not a Taser could have been chosen instead of a gun I dont know, Ira Graham III told CNNs John Berman. But I do know that with MaKhia having that lethal weapon in her hand, she did need to be stopped.
https://www.sbsun.com/2021/04/21/ohio-police-officer-shot-and-killed-a-black-teenage-girl-holding-a-knife-police-say-and-bodycam-video-shows/
honest.abe
(8,618 posts)I know there wasnt enough time but he could have tried to stop her with his baton. A stabbing isnt always lethal so the girl in pink might have been injured but not dead and the girl with the knife would probably still be alive. Blasting away 4 shots seems extreme in this case.
Demsrule86
(68,509 posts)girl and likely kill her...that is just nuts.
Happy Hoosier
(7,221 posts)The argument seems to be that since we don't know for certain that the victim would have been killed, she wasn't worthy of protecting? That seems a strange argument to me.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)is still stabbing as if they weren't there. If this were a white guy stabbing a screaming lady, I don't think anyone would be going out on a limb to condemn the police here. Let's be honest.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)marie999
(3,334 posts)could have pulled and shot the laser.
Xoan
(25,311 posts)uponit7771
(90,306 posts)Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)the girl in pink is alive after a rage-filled maniac tried to stab her. Same way as I don't care that police shot an unarmed Ashli Babbitt for breaking into the place where Congresspeople were hiding. The police shot the dude that murdered 10 people in Boulder. The police are generally authorized to use force to protect others from being killed right in front of them. Had the police arrived and the perp ran away, and they shot her later, then I'd think that was bullshit. But instead, they arrived and she saw them and appeared to ignore them and continued trying to stab someone instead of the fight breaking up. That's pretty fucking insane. They weren't dealing with a rational person who would stop even in their presence. You can Monday morning quarterback all you like, but this isn't a case where I would go out on a limb to defend the shooting "victim". The real victim was saved.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)depends on how you view people.
I don't see children in foster care who called the police to protect her because she was being attacked by a group of other girls as a "maniac."
But your characterization tells us a lot about your perspective.
And as for your determination of who the "real victim" was, how do you know that the girl in pink was not the instigator of the whole situation and was the reason the girl had turned into a "rage filled maniac" desperately trying to protect herself?
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)after the fact, but the police were called to deal with a stabbing that turned into a brawl right in front of them. They dealt with the unknown and the unpredictable in the heat of the moment.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)And then there is the likelihood he was too far away to allow the barbs to sink in.
Tasers are not designed to be used in life and death situations. Which this one was. That cop saved the girl in pink from severe injuries if not death. That is not a small 3 in pocket knife but a 6-8 in blade knife. If could easily reach the victims liver or heart which would have likely been fatal.
Shitty situation. But I dont see him having a real life option.
kcr
(15,315 posts)This is what completely baffles me. The total disregard for the girl who was almost stabbed.
It reminds me of a murder I witnessed in front of my house. One young black man who lived a few houses down from me was murdered by another young black man who lived nearby. I heard it happen and saw the aftermath and I will never forget it. The DA declined to charge and it will never stop bothering me because I fully believe the decision was based on her lack of interest in justice for the victim. I remember the speculation at the time about how the victim must have done something to bring it on himself. I had just got home before it happened, and had seen the victim walking toward my house as I pulled in. I was probably the last person to see him alive. Some of the comments in the threads here speculating remind me of that time. There was no time for cops to even come, but if they had, could they not defend the young man I saw dead and bleeding on the street in front of my home? Or anyone for that matter. I don't believe it. I refuse to believe it.
I don't like guns and don't think anyone should have them. At the same time when someone commits an act of violence in defense of another person, I won't speak against that.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)My husband was held at gunpoint during a robbery in which he could hear a clerk being beaten/pistol whipped, but had to lie face-down on the floor and couldn't do anything. He still thinks about that, hearing the poor young man screaming and being completely powerless to help, afraid of being shot execution-style himself at any moment. (The young man was bleeding but not seriously injured, thankfully.) These situations are so highly-charged and unpredictable, even for police, and it's hard for me to condemn the attempt to protect a life. Had the girl received a fatal wound, right in front of the officer, he would probably have a hard time living with that, same as he might have a hard time living with killing a teenager. It's a hard spot to be in.
kcr
(15,315 posts)I saw a young man who looked like the victim, walking on a sidewalk with his hands in his pockets just like he was. It was a sunny day, too, just like that day. It immediately took me back to that moment and I started crying. Something like that happening never leaves you. I'm sure it affects how I view things. And I was only a witness.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)Seeing someone alive and then they are killed...tough to get past that, even if you don't know that person.
hack89
(39,171 posts)TwilightZone
(25,432 posts)A 30-second Google search would have provided you that information.
First result: https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/crime/2021/04/13/columbus-area-police-protocols-guns-tasers-confusion/7203917002/
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)The yellow device attached to the front of his belt is a taser, probably an X26 or close variant.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)Response to greenjar_01 (Reply #71)
StarfishSaver This message was self-deleted by its author.
honest.abe
(8,618 posts)A domestic dispute like this among children/young adults with no guns seems the perfect scenario for a taser. I would think he violated protocol.
kcr
(15,315 posts)They've made police forces safer and less violent
honest.abe
(8,618 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)If they were really the efficient, less-lethal alternative they would have completely replaced guns. But, they didn't, because that's not what they're really for.
honest.abe
(8,618 posts)kcr
(15,315 posts)For torturing people who know their rights. For quickly ensuring complete and utter compliance.
If anything, the addition of tasers contributed to overall police brutality, including the use of guns. Why try to use words and de-escalation when you can just reach and zap? Instant gratification.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... saying the taser is "slower" than a bullet
TwilightZone
(25,432 posts)It was quite prominent in the picture that made the rounds almost immediately after the shooting.
For someone who professes to be an expert on the situation, you certainly don't seem to have much knowledge about it. You couldn't even get her name right.
SYFROYH
(34,163 posts)When he walked up he said something like, "what's going on"?
Everyone was standing around in the driveway. Ma'khia was in a bit of a face-off with a girl in shorts. As he approached the two interacted and Ma'khia swung the knife at the girl in shorts. It was really close.
That's when he pulled his pistol.
Then Ma'khia went after the girl in pink.
There wasn't any time to switch.
Could he have pulled the taser to begin with, maybe, but there was someone within arm's reach of victims swinging a knife. It wasn't like so many other cases where someone has a knife and is 20+ feet away and not making much movement when a cop shoots center mass.
Sympthsical
(9,041 posts)The cop is easily ten feet away, the attacker is actively slashing. One cut is all it takes to take a life. Tasers are not guaranteed.
Seriously, what movie is being watched (is it on Showtime?) where everyone knows exactly how guns and tasers work. Maybe the cop could have Indiana Jones'd the knife out of her hand with a whip?
The attacker was trying to take a life. Police should shoot to neutralize an imminent deadly threat. This case isn't even a difficult one. But behold the hill, for we shall suicide ourselves upon it.
This is devolving into parody at this point.
The cop saved a life. The girl who died was attempting potential murder. But let's burn some credibility on it. It's a Wednesday.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)Sympthsical
(9,041 posts)It's not the movies. You don't fire a taser and threat disappeared. You have to have a clean shot from a reasonable distance, hope it connects in the way it must due to various factors, and then pray it actually immobilizes in time to prevent the attack (if it immobilizes at all).
She was actively slashing at someone.
Cops are trained to fire at center mass until the threat is neutralized.
Why does the black victim's life not matter here, but apparently the black would be murderer's one does?
Awfully choosy all of a sudden.
You want a "Cops Suck" narrative? No problem. Because they do suck. But to use this case for it? This feels like satire at this point, at yet I know people are being earnest. That's worrisome.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... probability on that.
Some people are arguing a bad position
kcr
(15,315 posts)The last thing police reform needs is any promotion of more Reach for the Bang Bang Thingies! Lethal or not. Tasers may not kill most of the time, but they've become the default solution for most police encounters. Their introduction to police forces was a detriment to police reform. They were even fought against in the beginning. Even if they don't lead to "confusion" They're part of the reason cops are trained to reach for their holster the minute anyone blinks. Whether it's a gun or a taser or the cop gets "confused" depends on the situation, the cop, and the training. The fight against tasers should be fundamental in the fight for police reform, along with pushing for the trend to disarm in general.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... Given similar situated situations.
It could have been mace or something else likely though but the cops here decides not to use it and pump a kid five times close range into the chest
That's like wow really?!
But yes the default shouldn't even be tasers but in this case I think the kid would have been alive
kcr
(15,315 posts)But two things can be true at the same time. That police do indeed use deadly force disproportionately against Black people AND in this instance, it happened to be justifiable force. Unless your argument is deadly force is NEVER justified. Unless we're going to argue that the solution to the fact that police mete out more deadly force against Black people is never using it against Black people no matter what, even if it means Black people will die as a result. I don't think anyone is actually making those arguments.
Happy Hoosier
(7,221 posts)There was an IMMEDIATE AND MORTAL threat to another person. If that wasn't justification for the use of deadly force, then there isn't one. And if we are going to try and make that argument, we are going to lose.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... those people who are trying to make the claim a taser wouldn't have worked or ignorant or trying to start shit
Happy Hoosier
(7,221 posts)I appreciate the not-so-oblique attack on me. Nice.
I did look into this, so I am not ignorant. Here is an example:
https://www.npr.org/2019/06/27/729922975/despite-widespread-use-police-rate-tasers-as-less-effective-than-believed
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... of a taser attack is ignorant or willfully ignorant bottom line.
End In the story
ProfessorGAC
(64,885 posts)You've used that at least a dozen times. But,...
...you ignore anything to do with time to impact, lack of assurance of proper contact, lack of assurance the shock totally prevents a slashing motion...
Then, you have the temerity to accuse others of willful ignorance.
That's way too convenient.
Beringia
(4,316 posts)that covers a lot of these scenarios. I wish they would weigh on these encounters. I suppose they would have to be retired or something to speak out.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)RegularJam
(914 posts)I'm convinced there would have only been minor injuries had the cop not have even pulled his weapon. People think about things like they see them in the movies. Rarely holds true to form in real life.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... that the kid would be alive if she was tasered as even higher than with bullets
A lot of people on this thread are avoiding the question are being silly with it and I don't know why we're still giving this much deference to law enforcement like this
kcr
(15,315 posts)Something like 80% So, what are we even doing?
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)...Are met with more deadly force than needed
I'm almost agreeing with you shoot the kid once and to leave it at that but fuck five times really?!
Outside of that he could have used a taser The ones who are arguing a taser wouldn't work are ignorant or they are trying to start shit
kcr
(15,315 posts)If knives aren't that dangerous because the wounds are survivable, then by that definition guns aren't that dangerous either. But of course, that isn't actually the case. Both are pretty dangerous in reality, even if people survive the wounds more often than not.
RegularJam
(914 posts)They were in such close proximity. Throw your night stick while running in as fast as you can. It's over in seconds. Literally. Maybe someone would have needed a couple of stitches.
That is just one possibility out of many. There are other ways to approach these things.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... but for Americans and a lot of people who are not people of color it looks like shooting somebody is always the preferred
harumph
(1,894 posts)LisaL
(44,972 posts)So they are not advised if a person is armed and is actively attacking someone as far as I can tell.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... is most likely a taser would've flexed a 15 yr old girl and those things aren't used when it comes to black people cause cops see us as more of a threat
hardluck
(637 posts)In the field, the work about 60-70% of the time with a variety of factors influencing their failure rate. Would some of those factors have been an issue here? I don't know. Clothing unlikely to be a factor given what she was wearing. Distance? Potential factor as based on the second bodycam footage it appears the officer is about five feet away, which is less than optimal for taser use. So there could be an issue with the dart spread depending on which model taser he used.
The other issue is the officer drew his firearm once he saw her running in his direction with the knife. Given that a knife is a lethal weapon at those ranges, that is not surprising. Once she charged the girl in pink there wouldn't have been enough time for him to transition to the taser, or to holster his pistol and attempt to go hands on with her before the girl in pink was stabbed. Would it have been a better outcome if he had done that and the women in pink was stabbed? Unknown, we might still have had a death there, or two.
What would have been better would be having two officers arrive to a person with a knife call where one could provide lethal cover and one could attempt to deescalate the situation or use less than lethal force.
uponit7771
(90,306 posts)... bottom line is; black people are treated more harshly when it comes to lethal force than white people.
That's hands down for some reason white people are given less than lethal but for black people lethal is justified by efficacy of equipment or some other peripheral cause.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(487 posts)You often would guess ages wrong.
It seemed to me that the person came into view with a rush and it was over almost before it started.
Much of your point would apply beyond the age, but you point out the age as if it is a major factor, if not the deciding factor.
It seemed that the police person saw the knife along with the close quarters chaos, and being in fear of great danger, used their dominant hand to grab the device that they train for. We could have police wear their tasers on their dominant side.
I don't know if tasers have nearly the same effectiveness as regular weapons when it comes to stopping a moment with chaos.
I suppose if it is just a button or a zipper or a loose connection that we would have to worry about, we could handle that much risk of failure.
Even then, they would have to be on the dominant side and that might cause more risk in other situations.
But, I want the innocent party protected fully at that point.