General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWoman charged with felony for not returning VHS tape 21 years ago
A woman who allegedly failed to return a rented VHS tape to her local video store back in 1999 is now facing felony charges 21 years later. Caron McBride that she only learned that she had a warrant out for her arrest and charges filed against her this week. While trying to legally change her name following her marriage and relocation to Texas, she learned of her own criminal past.
"I went to change my driver's license, during this COVID thing you had to make an appointment, and so, I sent them an email [and] they sent me an email and they told me... that I had an issue in Oklahoma and this was the reference number for me to call this number and I did," McBride said. The number connected her to the Cleveland County (OK) District Attorney's Office. During the call, McBride was informed that because she did not return a VHS copy of Sabrina the Teenage Witch in 1999, she was facing felony charges.
Court records obtained noted that McBride had been charged with felony embezzlement of rented property in 2000. The tape was rented at a local store called "Movie Place," which closed its doors in 2008. McBride alleged that she herself never rented the tape, nor does she remember watching it. "I had lived with a young man, this was over 20 years ago. He had two kids, daughters that were 8, 10, or 11 years old, and I'm thinking he went and got it and didn't take it back or something," she explained.
McBride also believed that her documented "criminal background" is the reason her career has been in flux for the last 20 years. "Because when they ran my criminal background check, all they're seeing is those two words: felony embezzlement". She claimed that since 1999, she has been fired from a handful of jobs, but never was given a reason. The Cleveland County District Attorney's Office announced on Wednesday that they would be dismissing the case against McBride. A local attorney told Fox 25 that, in order to truly be free of this VHS drama, McBride still needs legal intervention to have the charges expunged from her records.
https://www.newsweek.com/woman-facing-felony-charge-not-returning-vhs-tape-over-20-years-ago-1586050
dalton99a
(81,391 posts)Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)This is some country.
jimfields33
(15,678 posts)I dont blame her for wanting to forget that movie. Hopefully shell be able to fix her legal problems.
PJMcK
(21,995 posts)Enjoy your weekend.
jimfields33
(15,678 posts)Enjoy your weekend as well.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)there was nothing in the article to warrant talking about the person like that.
but you did.
i think more of her than of you.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)i'm sure you do too.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)live with, who had young children, etc.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)Not funny.
Kingofalldems
(38,421 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)what the hell is your problem?
congratulations on making DU a worse place.
kcr
(15,314 posts)lpbk2713
(42,736 posts)The DA's office should be able to act on that and not bother Ms McBride.
Haggard Celine
(16,834 posts)dropped the charges long ago, especially since the store closed down in 2008! I wonder how many people out there have warrants out for them from things they did decades ago. And now she's probably going to have to spend $1000 to get that charge expunged. That is some aggravating shit!
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)Getting back the right to vote doesnt go far enough. There should be a way to remove items depending on severity and history since then for employment, credit, housing, etc.
There should be tighter rules on using criminal history in hiring and firing. A nonviolent crime when you are 18 shouldnt be a millstone 10 years later if theres been nothing else.
I suppose at least there wasnt the aggravating factor of forgetting to rewind.
ProfessorGAC
(64,847 posts)For a $10-20 tape?
Seems an excessive charge.
Lochloosa
(16,060 posts)That put it in the felony class most likely
ProfessorGAC
(64,847 posts)I rented tapes very seldom. Probably less times than fingers on one hand. So, I didn't know that.
I also didn't realize embezzlement applied to someone that didn't work for the outfit from whom funds were stolen.
I also would have thought this was theft, not embezzlement.
On Edit: $100 charge almost seems like theft. We didn't rent many tapes, but we bought some. $25 was expensive for a movie back then. A $100 no-return charge seems very high.
Lochloosa
(16,060 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,136 posts)purchased were more expensive than the VHS tapes that were produced for home sales. They were more heavy duty and would hold up to hundreds of plays. The replacement cost of $100 was fair. However, unless she worked for the Blockbuster, I don't see how she could be charged with "embezzlement" of any kind.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)I paid for videos in those times that I actually lost and it wasn't that much.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)then the cost for replacement.
$100 to replace a video in 1999 or 2000 is not the going rate.
but also notice she wasn't convicted, just charged.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,371 posts)Rebl2
(13,458 posts)involved stealing from an employer. Did she work for that store at the time?
forgotmylogin
(7,520 posts)I forgot to return a book to the library and had it with me over summer break. When I returned in the fall I took it back prepared to pay late fees. The librarian said good thing you got this back to us now - another month it would have been reported as stolen, and since this is a state university, that would fall under stealing from the government which is a felony!
😳
Imagine answering the whaddya in for? question on that!
onethatcares
(16,161 posts)a certain person was elected senator after his company stole 17 billion dollars worth of medicare moneys. He got a golden parachute and $300,000,000.00 for saying "I don't recall" over 75 times during a deposition.
He wants to run for president.
Go figure..
LisaL
(44,972 posts)not returned. I had to go argue with the librarian and then search for it on the shelf. Once I found it they admitted it was returned and scanned it in their system as such. Obviously they didn't scan it correctly as returned when I returned it. I could have been accused of stealing a book, which I actually returned on time.
Archae
(46,301 posts)But it was a book I had no interest in, how it got scanned as checked out by me I still have no idea.
I finally went to the library, found the book, gave it to the librarian and told her it was on the shelf in it's proper spot.
Problem solved.
BoomaofBandM
(1,769 posts)rownesheck
(2,343 posts)that's what she gets for not returning the video. Maybe now she'll think twice about breaking the law.
Ok, ok. I'm kinda half joking. But, man I used to hate hearing "I never rented that video! I'm not paying the late fee!"
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)for returned videos. And I will never forget renting Snow White and the 7 Dwarfs for my kids, only it wasn't the G-rated version...nope...triple X for sure.
forgotmylogin
(7,520 posts)So many times I'd just put the tape through that slot in the door and assume they'd scan it back in right.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)and people not caring about the facts of the case, just legalistic buzz terms.
Of course these "rules" do not apply if one has enough wealth.
dalton99a
(81,391 posts)to serve and protect the wealthy and powerful
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)and yet we let folks walk around with Machine Guns.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)What I didn't understand was how the rental tape matter got to a felony. The tape is worth maybe $100 at maximum retail - how low was the threshold for "felony embezzlement of rented property" in Oklahoma? Did they include late fees?
FakeNoose
(32,577 posts)It's a completely unfair situation. Whatever "losses" the video store encountered, it was covered by insurance long ago. I'm sure it didn't prevent them from renting out more videotapes to more customers and making more money. And yet their over-the-top charges against this woman have really messed up her life.
For what it's worth, those video stores made lots of money from renting VHS tapes back in the day. Losing a few along the way cost them very little. It was almost a cost of doing business. After each tape was rented out 9 or 10 times it was paid for, all the rest was profit.
Bristlecone
(10,114 posts)It is a VHS tape. Forget the store closing. Try to find a VHS player at any store that is not a pawn shop.
Ridiculous.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Bristlecone
(10,114 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,559 posts)I'd have thought that the statute of limitations would apply. Clearly, I have a lay person's understanding of the concept.
yonder
(9,656 posts)The county I was charged in called that "possession of a narcotic implement". Seemed a bit harsh.
I have always wondered if that's still on my record.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,559 posts)...that it may have gone the way of mine. It was never computerized when they transferred all the paper records, so it had disappeared into the mists of time. I still had it tracked down and a pardon issued, though.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)Jon King
(1,910 posts)I highly doubt she never got any notices way back then. She can't even be sure of the ages of the kids she lived with. She is likely telling parts of the total story.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)It was likely sent to her boyfriend.
Vinca
(50,236 posts)bottomofthehill
(8,318 posts)Not the cost of the tape.
world wide wally
(21,738 posts)I just remembered that I didn't rewind "The Lion King".
Fuuuck
Jedi Guy
(3,175 posts)central scrutinizer
(11,637 posts)When he cant find a working VHS player, habeas corpus will force the charges to be dropped.
LisaL
(44,972 posts)However she still has to figure out how to remove it from her record.
central scrutinizer
(11,637 posts)You could petition for expungement but it would still live on on the inter webs. 87,000,000 references found in 2.3 seconds
Response to left-of-center2012 (Original post)
sarcasmo This message was self-deleted by its author.
skypilot
(8,851 posts)Every video rental place I've ever dealt with would have your credit card number on file and if you didn't return the video you would simply be charged for it as though you'd bought it.
struggle4progress
(118,224 posts)ecstatic
(32,648 posts)Looks like Fox and other low credibility outlets are pushing the story.
LisaL
(44,972 posts)kcr
(15,314 posts)Back when VHS was still a thing. It was the husband of a co-worker. I remember when she got the call and had to leave to go bail him out. We were all completely shocked. I don't think he was charged with a felony, however.