Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,055 posts)
Tue Apr 27, 2021, 03:19 PM Apr 2021

The Supreme Court's conservatives are quaking over cancel culture



Tweet text:
Ian Millhiser
@imillhiser
One of the biggest mistakes that I made about this SCOTUS is that I thought that most of the Republican justices were corporate Republicans who came up in corporate law firms and largely thought that way.

Turns out, they are Fox News culture warriors.

The Supreme Court’s conservatives are quaking over cancel culture
The Court’s right flank is afraid that the monster under their bed will cancel them.
vox.com
6:13 AM · Apr 27, 2021


https://www.vox.com/22404001/supreme-court-cancel-culture-americans-for-prosperity-bonta-california-alito-thomas-gorsuch

Here’s a quote from someone who, not that long ago, was widely considered to be on the cutting edge of conservative thinking about the law:

“Requiring people to stand up in public for their political acts fosters civic courage, without which democracy is doomed. For my part, I do not look forward to a society which, thanks to the Supreme Court, campaigns anonymously ... and even exercises the direct democracy of initiative and referendum hidden from public scrutiny and protected from the accountability of criticism. This does not resemble the Home of the Brave.”

Those are the words of the late Justice Antonin Scalia, in a 2010 opinion concerning whether the public should be allowed to learn who signed a petition seeking to call a referendum on a state law.

They form a stark contrast with the attitude of conservative justices on Monday, only a little more than a decade after Doe, when the Court heard another case asking whether disclosure laws can be applied to political actors.

The conservative justices who heard this new case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, showed little of the confidence and “civic courage” that Scalia once celebrated. Many of them bristled with paranoia that angry mobs lurk in every alleyway, waiting to cancel conservative speakers.

*snip*


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Supreme Court's conservatives are quaking over cancel culture (Original Post) Nevilledog Apr 2021 OP
They can cry me a gay wedding cake soothsayer Apr 2021 #1
Yes they are Fox News culture warriors. StClone Apr 2021 #2
This Is Why WHITT Apr 2021 #3
They are Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation culture warriors... JHB Apr 2021 #4
The rest of the article hints that the case is already lost FBaggins Apr 2021 #5

StClone

(11,683 posts)
2. Yes they are Fox News culture warriors.
Tue Apr 27, 2021, 03:30 PM
Apr 2021

That is why they were at the front of the line for open SCOTUS slots. Next Up: A Constitutional Convention (to re-write the Constitution to sever the last threads of Democracy), going for all the marbles after nutz-a-fying the SCOTUS.

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
3. This Is Why
Tue Apr 27, 2021, 03:39 PM
Apr 2021

The House needs to pass the legislation expanding the court to 13 justices. It would be a 'SHOT ACROSS THE BOW' warning to the RightWingers on the court, that we can take you down, if you try and hand down some extremist rulings on guns, healthcare, LGBTQ+, etc.

JHB

(37,157 posts)
4. They are Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation culture warriors...
Tue Apr 27, 2021, 03:54 PM
Apr 2021

Those are the groups that gave names for The Howler Monkey to nominate and The Turtle to ensure they were confirmed.

It's not just Trump and FOX ranters. Those "conservative" groups are a lot more radical than they are usually given credit for.

FBaggins

(26,727 posts)
5. The rest of the article hints that the case is already lost
Tue Apr 27, 2021, 06:29 PM
Apr 2021

It implies that there's a unanimous ruling possibility if they merely overturn the 9th circuit, but do so with an "as applied" ruling. The author seems to think there's no chance of a victory for CA.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Supreme Court's conse...