Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dajoki

(10,678 posts)
Wed Apr 28, 2021, 01:14 PM Apr 2021

You Don't Actually Need to Reach Across the Aisle, Mr. Biden

You Don’t Actually Need to Reach Across the Aisle, Mr. Biden
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/28/opinion/joe-biden-bipartisanship.html?

President Biden’s first address to a joint session of Congress, on Wednesday night, will be scrutinized to assess his commitment to working with Republicans. There is nothing wrong with reaching across the aisle to seek common ground.

But insisting on bipartisanship — given the major policy divide between the parties on economic recovery, tax reform, climate change and health care — usually guarantees gridlock (which promotes voter cynicism) or actions that are watered down and ineffective (which are condemned by everyone, right and left).

There is nothing wrong with being partisan. Over a century ago, Representative Jacob Fassett, a New York Republican, counseled, “We were all elected by partisans because we were partisans, and as such represented party purposes as expressed by party platforms,” adding that a politician should “have opinions and convictions” and not “be a political chocolate éclair.”

In the decades after World War II, bipartisan policymaking became the norm because the ideological divisions within both parties — for example, there were numerous liberal Republicans who, since Reconstruction, supported civil rights — compelled cross-party alliances. Most issues did not break down ideologically by party. In fact, for much of the 20th century, supporters of political reform, environmentalism and civil rights could be found as easily in the Republican as in the Democratic Party.

A sizable cohort of moderate to liberal Republicans like Jacob Javits, Clifford Case and Mark Hatfield provided the votes to pass progressive legislation. Similarly, during periods of conservative activism, Republicans could reach across the aisle to find conservative Democrats (like “boll weevils”) to help pass their priorities.

But those circumstances no longer exist, and as a result, bipartisanship has become the Sasquatch of American politics: rarely seen but fervently sought. The opportunities for finding cross-party support for significant legislation, except in response to a national calamity, like the Troubled Asset Relief Program for the financial crisis, have evaporated. The parties have fundamentally changed — there are now very few liberal Republicans or conservative Democrats — and that transformation has hollowed out the middle ground of American politics. Continuing to demand bipartisanship as the validator of sound policy is not only fanciful but also self-defeating.

snip//

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You Don't Actually Need to Reach Across the Aisle, Mr. Biden (Original Post) dajoki Apr 2021 OP
True, Sir The Magistrate Apr 2021 #1
Yep. Let THEM "reach across the aisle". Trailrider1951 Apr 2021 #2
Biden teaching across the aisle doesn't cause gridlock. LakeArenal Apr 2021 #3
He invites them to play, they say no, he moves on soothsayer Apr 2021 #4
Biden has 60% approval and democrats control the trifecta unblock Apr 2021 #5
Besides... world wide wally Apr 2021 #6

Trailrider1951

(3,414 posts)
2. Yep. Let THEM "reach across the aisle".
Wed Apr 28, 2021, 01:22 PM
Apr 2021

I'm so tired of their Lucy with the football act when it comes to doing the country's business. And I suspect that President Biden is as well.

unblock

(52,196 posts)
5. Biden has 60% approval and democrats control the trifecta
Wed Apr 28, 2021, 01:35 PM
Apr 2021

Bipartisanship is a way of forging a majority coalition. It's often necessary, and with our thin margins may be needed in the present circumstances.

But it's more of a means to an end, and if you have a majority coalition already, there's not great need to include the minority just for the sake of including them. Only for certain issues that really demand more than a slim majority is that important.


Never mind that republicans never give a crap about bipartisanship when they're in a position to force their idiotic views on the rest of us. When was the last time republicans backed off their lunacy for the sake of including democrats?

world wide wally

(21,740 posts)
6. Besides...
Wed Apr 28, 2021, 01:49 PM
Apr 2021

We already got Manchin on our own side to obstruct everything Biden wants to get done in the interest of the country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You Don't Actually Need t...