Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dsc

(52,170 posts)
1. I think the crime would have to involve Trump
Wed Apr 28, 2021, 06:09 PM
Apr 2021

To take a hypothetical, I am John Doe's lawyer, I rob a liquor store, I keep the money. John Doe is OK.

A different hypothetical, I am John Doe's lawyer, I rob a liquor store at John's bequest and split the money, John Doe is in trouble.

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,837 posts)
2. Perhaps it does and that is why Rudy was raided by the Feds.
Wed Apr 28, 2021, 06:19 PM
Apr 2021

Donald Trump has to be very concened the fire is getting closer to him.

Why else would Rudy be doing concerning Ukraine were it not for Trump?

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. "if a client initiates a communication with a lawyer for the purpose of committing a crime
Wed Apr 28, 2021, 06:22 PM
Apr 2021

or an act of fraud in the future, the attorney-client privilege typically doesn’t apply."

From: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/attorney-client-privilege.html

Discussions of previous acts are generally subject to the attorney-client privilege. If, for example, if a client tells his lawyer that he robbed a bank or lied about assets during a divorce, the lawyer probably can’t disclose the information.

But if a client initiates a communication with a lawyer for the purpose of committing a crime or an act of fraud in the future, the attorney-client privilege typically doesn’t apply. Likewise, most states allow—or require—attorneys to disclose information learned from a client that will prevent death or serious injury. Many have a similar rule where revealing otherwise confidential information would prevent or remedy financial injury due to a crime or fraud.

ShazamIam

(2,577 posts)
5. We did hear all that testimony during the first impeachment, Trump telling everyone important tio
Wed Apr 28, 2021, 06:58 PM
Apr 2021

Kind of hard to deny Trump was directing both U.S. officials and others, to contact Giuliani to get on board with His (Trump's) Ukraine operation.

The U.S. Senate voted not guilty, that doesn't mean Trump is not guilty of directing Giuliani to break the law(s).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Rudy was committing a ...